VAERS (U.S., 2006–2024): 12,006 symptom mentions (7.53/100k doses). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (79%), Injection-site / Local reaction (5%), General / Systemic (non-local) (3%).
Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 34 reaction mentions in 17 unique reports (82.3% serious (14 of 17 reports)). Largest share: Dermatological (non-injection-site) (21%), Autoimmune / Immune-mediated (12%), Allergic / Anaphylactic (9%).
JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 193 reaction mentions in 144 unique reports (8.3% serious (12 of 144 reports)). Largest share: Neurological (27%), Other / Unclassified (20%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%).
EudraVigilance (EU DAP export): 11,980 individual cases (up to 28/06/2026). Reaction SOC categories were not exported in the local DAP workbooks — case count only.
VigiAccess (WHO): 234,603 reaction-term mentions · search: Hib. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (22%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Injection-site / Local reaction (13%).
Lareb (Netherlands): 254 reaction-term mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Cardiac / Cardiovascular (15%).
DAEN (Australia): 1,824 reaction-term mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (25%), Psychiatric / Neuropsychiatric (16%), General / Systemic (non-local) (16%).
Medsafe (New Zealand): 46 reaction-term mentions · search: Hib. Largest share: Gastrointestinal (30%), General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Neurological (15%).
Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top VAERS: Other / Unclassified; top Canada Vigilance: Dermatological (non-injection-site); top JADER: Neurological.
SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, and Medsafe counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via
SurVigilance (GPL-3.0; pip install SurVigilance). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.
Pharmacovigilance Lot Signal Detection — Hypothesis-Generating Only
Multi-system context below. VAERS (U.S.) supports lot-level volume z-scores and seriousness flags by product and lot (2006–2024). Each lot links to a summary with report count, seriousness %, adverse-event pie chart, U.S. state map, and timeline. A signal flag means a statistical threshold was exceeded — not that a lot is unsafe. Full dashboard →
VAERS flags:
VOL high report volume (z ≥ 3) ·
BURST clustered in <90 days ·
SER serious reports >50%.
Lot numbers are voluntary/incomplete in VAERS. Location data is U.S. state only (no postal codes in the public extract).
VAERS (United States) — all lots by product
2,790 reports with usable lot across 380 lots · 32 flagged
Other Pharmacovigilance Systems
Lot-level analysis is only possible where reporters supply batch/lot numbers in the public extract. Canada Vigilance, JADER (PMDA, Japan), and most other national systems publish product-level spontaneous reports without lot fields.
Canada Vigilance (Health Canada)
17 unique reports · 34 reaction mentions · 82.3% serious (14 of 17 reports). Top categories: Dermatological (non-injection-site) (21%), Autoimmune / Immune-mediated (12%), Allergic / Anaphylactic (9%).
Canada Vigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The public CV Online data extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible for this system — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. No Canadian dose denominators are available. Extract 2026-03-31.
Search Canada Vigilance →
JADER (PMDA, Japan)
144 unique reports · 193 reaction mentions · 8.3% serious (12 of 144 reports). Top categories: Neurological (27%), Other / Unclassified (20%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%).
JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database) spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations; PMDA has not assessed causality per case. The public CSV extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. Reaction terms in source data use MedDRA/J Preferred Terms. JADER CSV extract pmdacasereport202606 (2026-06). JADER reference (PDF)
Search JADER / PMDA adverse reactions →
EudraVigilance (EU)
11,980 individual cases (up to 28/06/2026) · HAEMOPHILUS TYPE B CONJUGATE VACCINE. Reaction SOC breakdown not included in this DAP export.
EudraVigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The local EudraVigilance DAP workbooks provide individual-case counts from adrreports.eu; exported Reaction SOC filters were not set, so reaction-category charts are unavailable from this extract. Lot/batch numbers are not in public line listings.
Search EudraVigilance →
VigiAccess (WHO)
234,603 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Hib. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (22%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Injection-site / Local reaction (13%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search VigiAccess (WHO) →
Lareb (Netherlands)
254 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Cardiac / Cardiovascular (15%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search Lareb (Netherlands) →
DAEN (Australia)
1,824 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (25%), Psychiatric / Neuropsychiatric (16%), General / Systemic (non-local) (16%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search DAEN (Australia) →
All global data sources → · Data schemas →
Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)
Curated findings for Hib conjugate vaccines from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.
ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate
The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator.
Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs
more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group.
These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data.
Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.
○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance
CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
Outcome: Serious outcomes in infant schedule co-administration context
Tier 2
○ No signal detected
Hib conjugates transformed invasive Hib epidemiology. Active surveillance historically supported a favorable serious-risk profile; routine monitoring continues within combination-schedule studies rather than as a high-intensity standalone RCA focus.
PopulationInfants at VSD sites
Risk intervalStudy-specific
ComparisonControl intervals
Evaluation periodPost-conjugate introduction (late 1980s onward)
MethodHistorical and ongoing observational monitoring of conjugate Hib products
Sources: CDC VSD
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record.
Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety);
Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard);
Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications.
Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.