← All Vaccine Summaries Brought to you by the Open Source Medicine Foundation

Vaccine Evidence Summary

Hib Vaccine Side Effects (Haemophilus influenzae type b — AE Database Reports)

This page answers “hib vaccine side effects” with sourced pharmacovigilance data — VAERS and pharmacovigilance donut charts by category. Counts are database reports, not proven vaccine-caused injury rates.

Look up a vaccine lot or batch number in VAERS →

Last updated: July 2026 · Status: Current U.S. licensed products reviewed

ⓘ Methodology Note

This page summarizes published pre-licensure clinical trial data, post-licensure surveillance findings, and peer-reviewed epidemiological studies for Hib conjugate vaccines currently licensed in the United States. Safety and efficacy data are presented without interpretive language that implies the vaccine is "safe" or "unsafe." Data are drawn from FDA review documents, clinical trials, VSD analyses, VAERS summaries, IOM/National Academies reports, and peer-reviewed literature.

1. Basic Information

Disease Protected Against

Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) is a bacterial pathogen that primarily affects children <5 years. Before vaccination, Hib was the leading cause of bacterial meningitis in U.S. children, as well as epiglottitis, septic arthritis, pneumonia, and bacteremia. Hib meningitis has a case-fatality rate of ~3–6% and causes permanent neurological sequelae (hearing loss, developmental delay) in 15–30% of survivors. Nontypeable H. influenzae (NTHi) strains, which are not covered by the Hib vaccine, cause otitis media and respiratory infections in children and adults but not invasive disease at the same rates.

CDC Recommended Schedule (U.S., 2025)

DoseRecommended AgeNotes
Dose 12 monthsMinimum age 6 weeks
Dose 24 months
Dose 3 (if needed)6 monthsDepends on product (PedvaxHIB = 2-dose series; ActHIB/Hiberix/Pentacel/VAXELIS = 3-dose series)
Booster12–15 monthsAll products require a booster dose at 12–15 months

Source: CDC ACIP, 2025 Child & Adolescent Immunization Schedule. Note: PedvaxHIB (Merck, PRP-OMP conjugate) requires only a 2-dose primary series at 2 and 4 months plus a booster at 12–15 months.

Licensed Products (U.S.)

Ingredients (Package Insert)

Structured composition for 3 branded products covered on this page, taken from FDA-approved package inserts (DailyMed / manufacturer prescribing information). Lists are per product — formulations differ by manufacturer and presentation. Click an ingredient name to open its safety-context page when available.

Conjugate Intramuscular (IM) No preservative (typical single-dose) Adjuvant: Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate AAHS aluminum
ActHIB Sanofi Pasteur · Conjugate

Delivery

Route: Intramuscular (IM)

Form: Lyophilized powder (reconstitute)

Dose volume: 0.5 mL

Presentation: single-dose vial + saline diluent

Encapsulation / delivery vehicle

None (no nanoparticle/VLP encapsulation system)

Antigens

AntigenTypeAmount / dose
Haemophilus b capsular polysaccharide (PRP) conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T)
Carrier: tetanus toxoid
Conjugate10 mcg PRP

Adjuvants

None listed on the package insert for this product (common for live attenuated and some inactivated whole-virus vaccines).

Preservatives

  • None — Single-dose presentation; label states no preservative.

Excipients & residuals

IngredientCategoryAmountRole
SucroseStabilizer≈8.5%stabilizer
Tris (trometamol)Bufferlabel quantitybuffer
Sodium chloride diluentDiluent0.4%diluent

Unadjuvanted conjugate (unlike PedvaxHIB).

Source: FDA package insert · Verified 2026-07-09

PedvaxHIB Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Conjugate

Delivery

Route: Intramuscular (IM)

Form: Suspension for injection

Dose volume: 0.5 mL

Presentation: single-dose vial

Encapsulation / delivery vehicle

None (no nanoparticle/VLP encapsulation system)

Antigens

AntigenTypeAmount / dose
Haemophilus b PRP conjugated to Neisseria meningitidis OMPC (PRP-OMP)
Carrier: meningococcal outer membrane protein complex (OMPC)
Conjugate7.5 mcg PRP

Adjuvants

Preservatives

  • None — Single-dose presentation; label states no preservative.

Excipients & residuals

IngredientCategoryAmountRole
Sodium chlorideBufferlabel quantitytonicity
Sodium borateBufferlabel quantitybuffer

Source: Manufacturer prescribing information · Verified 2026-07-09

Hiberix GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals · Conjugate

Delivery

Route: Intramuscular (IM)

Form: Lyophilized powder (reconstitute)

Dose volume: 0.5 mL

Presentation: single-dose vial + saline diluent

Encapsulation / delivery vehicle

None (no nanoparticle/VLP encapsulation system)

Antigens

AntigenTypeAmount / dose
Haemophilus b PRP conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T)
Carrier: tetanus toxoid ≈25 mcg
Conjugate10 mcg PRP

Adjuvants

None listed on the package insert for this product (common for live attenuated and some inactivated whole-virus vaccines).

Preservatives

  • None — Single-dose presentation; label states no preservative.

Excipients & residuals

IngredientCategoryAmountRole
LactoseStabilizer≈12.6 mgstabilizer
Sodium chloride diluentDiluent0.9%diluent

Source: FDA package insert · Verified 2026-07-09

ⓘ How to read this section

Ingredient lists are sourced from official package inserts for the specific brands named above. Formulations can change between lots and over time — verify against the current label before any clinical decision. Presence of a substance does not by itself indicate harm; toxicology is dose-, route-, and context-dependent. Browse the full ingredient database: Vaccine Ingredients index.

Causality assessment & potential mechanisms

Conditions below combine WHO-style causality levels with potential biological mechanisms from the site mechanism catalog (ae_mechanisms_catalog.json). HRSA VICP table listing (where shown) indicates a compensable temporal association under U.S. program rules — not automatic proof of causation for every case. Mechanisms are hypothesis-level pathways with graded evidence.

Condition Time window Causality Potential mechanism(s)
Anaphylaxis HRSA table 0–1 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis) (primary · hypersensitivity)

Pre-existing or newly formed IgE against vaccine antigens or excipients (e.g., gelatin, egg proteins, PEG, polysorbate) triggers mast-cell and basophil degranulation with systemic mediator release.

SIRVA 0–2 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

SIRVA — incorrect injection into shoulder structures (primary · procedural)

Needle placement into the subdeltoid/subacromial bursa or joint rather than deltoid muscle causes prolonged local inflammation and restricted range of motion (procedural, not antigen-specific).

Framework: WHO causality + HRSA VICP (where applicable) + AE mechanism catalog. Last updated: 2026-07-18. Schema: schemas/vaccine_injury_table.schema.json · Mechanisms: schemas/ae_mechanism.schema.json. Not medical or legal advice.

2. Pre-Licensure Clinical Trial Data

Licensure trial design (ICAN / OpenVAERS)

The table below reproduces ICAN’s No Placebo Table rows for U.S. childhood-schedule products relevant to this page — including the control/comparator used in FDA licensing trials (not always saline placebo). OSMF presents this for transparency; it is not an endorsement of ICAN interpretations.

Vaccine Brand Manufacturer Doses (schedule) Ages injected Control / comparator Placebo Safety review window
HibActHIBSanofi3 or 42M 4M 6M 12MHepBNo30 days
HibHiberixGSK3 or 42M 4M 6M 12MHibTITER or other vaccineNo31 days
HibLiquid PedvaxHIBMerck3 or 42M 4M 6M 12MLyophilized PedvaxHIBNo3 days

Source: OpenVAERS — No Placebo Table · ICAN original PDF · Attribution: Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) via OpenVAERS · Last fetched: 2026-07-16. For many trials listing '6 months' safety review, ICAN notes review was typically ~30 days post-injection with a phone call at 6 months.

The first Hib polysaccharide vaccine (unconjugated) was licensed in 1985 but was poorly immunogenic in infants <18 months. The first conjugate vaccine (PRP-D, ProHIBIT) was licensed in 1987. Current PRP-T and PRP-OMP conjugate vaccines were licensed between 1989–1993. Pivotal trials enrolled several thousand infants each.

MetricDataEvidence Strength
Combined pre-licensure safety database~10,000+ infants across all conjugate productsModerate
Efficacy (invasive Hib disease)~95–100% in clinical trialsStrong
Seroprotection (anti-PRP ≥0.15 µg/mL)~90–100% after primary seriesStrong

Most Common Adverse Reactions

ReactionFrequency (Approx.)
Injection site pain/tenderness~10–25%
Injection site redness/swelling~5–10%
Fever >38°C~5–15%
Irritability~15–30%
Drowsiness~10–20%

Sources: Respective prescribing information; FDA review documents. Adverse reactions are generally mild and self-limited (1–3 days). Local reaction rates are higher when Hib is given as part of combination vaccines (Pentacel, VAXELIS).

Key Limitations

3. Post-Licensure Safety Data

VSD and VAERS

Hib vaccines have an extensive post-licensure safety record with >30 years of U.S. data. VSD and VAERS surveillance have not identified unexpected safety signals. Key findings:

⚠ Critical Caveat

VAERS data represent unverified reports temporally associated with vaccination. A report to VAERS does not mean the vaccine caused the event.

VAERS Reporting Data — Halma & Varon (2025), DARE-SAFE

The DARE-SAFE paper (Halma & Varon, Pharmacoepidemiology 2025, CC BY 4.0) analyzed VAERS reports for vaccines administered in the United States from 2006–2022. The following data are extracted from Table 1 of that paper for this vaccine (HiB (all Hib products combined)):

MetricValue
U.S. doses administered (2006–2022)159,451,493
Total VAERS AE reports21,526
AE reporting rate (per 100,000 doses)13.5
Total death reports435
Death reporting rate (per 100,000 doses)0.273
AE-to-Death ratio50:1

Source: Halma, M.; Varon, J. DARE-SAFE. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/pharma4020007. CC BY 4.0. Data from Table 1.

📚 Important Interpretive Caveats (from the paper itself)

  • Reporting rate ≠ incidence rate. VAERS is a passive, unverified system. A report means someone submitted a claim of temporal association, not a confirmed causal event. The paper is explicit that causality cannot be inferred from these numbers alone.
  • Reporting behavior is not uniform. More serious, unusual, or media-salient events are reported at much higher rates than mild ones. Products receiving more public, media, legal, and clinical attention (particularly COVID-19 vaccines, which also benefited from V-safe active-surveillance prompts and CICP compensation pathways) generate more reports per dose regardless of true risk.
  • Age and comorbidity confounding is not adjusted. COVID-19 vaccines were disproportionately administered to elderly and comorbid populations (nursing homes, 65+, high-risk groups in early 2021) with much higher background all-cause mortality than the general child/working-age population. Some fraction of temporally-associated deaths would occur regardless of vaccination, and the paper does not perform a background-rate comparison.
  • Stimulated reporting is a known, documented phenomenon. Media coverage, plaintiff attorney solicitation, and advocacy campaigns — all independently inflate VAERS reporting propensity. The paper cites this literature but does not correct for it.
  • Small-denominator rows are unreliable. Rates computed from small denominators (e.g., monovalent measles, DT, mumps, rubella) have enormous statistical uncertainty and should not be compared to vaccines with hundreds of millions of administered doses without noting the wide confidence intervals.

Source: Halma, M.; Varon, J. DARE-SAFE: Denominator-Adjusted Rate Estimates of Substance Adverse Events Frequency Evaluation in Pharmaceuticals and Vaccines. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025, 4, 7. DOI: 10.3390/pharma4020007. CC BY 4.0.

Passive Surveillance: AE Type Breakdown (Multi-System)

Side-by-side view of U.S. VAERS, Health Canada Canada Vigilance, Japan JADER (PMDA), EU EudraVigilance, and live-scraped international systems via SurVigilance (VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, Medsafe). SurVigilance panels show MedDRA PT mention totals (not individual-case counts). Category assignment uses keyword matching — approximate, not official SOC coding. VAERS ZIP CAPTCHA downloads use this site’s vaers_pipeline.py; FAERS is bulk quarterly ZIP via SurVigilance (not product search).

VAERS (United States)

Canada Vigilance (Canada)

JADER (PMDA, Japan)

EudraVigilance (EU)

11,980
individual cases · adrreports.eu DAP export (up to 28/06/2026)
Reaction SOC breakdown not included in this workbook export.

SurVigilance: VigiAccess · Lareb · DAEN · DMA · Medsafe

VigiAccess (WHO)

Lareb (Netherlands)

DAEN (Australia)

DMA (Denmark)

Denmark DMA interactive ADR search is currently offline (Danish Medicines Agency IT transition; public overviews frozen at 12 Mar 2024). Live product PT tables cannot be retrieved until DKMA restores the search. See DKMA notice. Denmark continues to report into EU EudraVigilance (panel above).

Medsafe (New Zealand)

VAERS (U.S., 2006–2024): 12,006 symptom mentions (7.53/100k doses). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (79%), Injection-site / Local reaction (5%), General / Systemic (non-local) (3%). Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 34 reaction mentions in 17 unique reports (82.3% serious (14 of 17 reports)). Largest share: Dermatological (non-injection-site) (21%), Autoimmune / Immune-mediated (12%), Allergic / Anaphylactic (9%). JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 193 reaction mentions in 144 unique reports (8.3% serious (12 of 144 reports)). Largest share: Neurological (27%), Other / Unclassified (20%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%). EudraVigilance (EU DAP export): 11,980 individual cases (up to 28/06/2026). Reaction SOC categories were not exported in the local DAP workbooks — case count only. VigiAccess (WHO): 234,603 reaction-term mentions · search: Hib. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (22%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Injection-site / Local reaction (13%). Lareb (Netherlands): 254 reaction-term mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Cardiac / Cardiovascular (15%). DAEN (Australia): 1,824 reaction-term mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (25%), Psychiatric / Neuropsychiatric (16%), General / Systemic (non-local) (16%). Medsafe (New Zealand): 46 reaction-term mentions · search: Hib. Largest share: Gastrointestinal (30%), General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Neurological (15%). Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top VAERS: Other / Unclassified; top Canada Vigilance: Dermatological (non-injection-site); top JADER: Neurological. SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, and Medsafe counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0; pip install SurVigilance). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.

Compare AE patterns across all vaccines →

Pharmacovigilance Lot Signal Detection — Hypothesis-Generating Only

Multi-system context below. VAERS (U.S.) supports lot-level volume z-scores and seriousness flags by product and lot (2006–2024). Each lot links to a summary with report count, seriousness %, adverse-event pie chart, U.S. state map, and timeline. A signal flag means a statistical threshold was exceeded — not that a lot is unsafe. Full dashboard →

VAERS flags: VOL high report volume (z ≥ 3) · BURST clustered in <90 days · SER serious reports >50%. Lot numbers are voluntary/incomplete in VAERS. Location data is U.S. state only (no postal codes in the public extract).

VAERS (United States) — all lots by product

2,790 reports with usable lot across 380 lots · 32 flagged

Loading lot tables…

Other Pharmacovigilance Systems

Lot-level analysis is only possible where reporters supply batch/lot numbers in the public extract. Canada Vigilance, JADER (PMDA, Japan), and most other national systems publish product-level spontaneous reports without lot fields.

Canada Vigilance (Health Canada)

17 unique reports · 34 reaction mentions · 82.3% serious (14 of 17 reports). Top categories: Dermatological (non-injection-site) (21%), Autoimmune / Immune-mediated (12%), Allergic / Anaphylactic (9%).

Canada Vigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The public CV Online data extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible for this system — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. No Canadian dose denominators are available. Extract 2026-03-31.

Search Canada Vigilance →

JADER (PMDA, Japan)

144 unique reports · 193 reaction mentions · 8.3% serious (12 of 144 reports). Top categories: Neurological (27%), Other / Unclassified (20%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%).

JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database) spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations; PMDA has not assessed causality per case. The public CSV extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. Reaction terms in source data use MedDRA/J Preferred Terms. JADER CSV extract pmdacasereport202606 (2026-06). JADER reference (PDF)

Search JADER / PMDA adverse reactions →

EudraVigilance (EU)

11,980 individual cases (up to 28/06/2026) · HAEMOPHILUS TYPE B CONJUGATE VACCINE. Reaction SOC breakdown not included in this DAP export.

EudraVigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The local EudraVigilance DAP workbooks provide individual-case counts from adrreports.eu; exported Reaction SOC filters were not set, so reaction-category charts are unavailable from this extract. Lot/batch numbers are not in public line listings.

Search EudraVigilance →

VigiAccess (WHO)

234,603 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Hib. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (22%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Injection-site / Local reaction (13%).

Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.

Search VigiAccess (WHO) →

Lareb (Netherlands)

254 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Cardiac / Cardiovascular (15%).

Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.

Search Lareb (Netherlands) →

DAEN (Australia)

1,824 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Haemophilus influenzae. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (25%), Psychiatric / Neuropsychiatric (16%), General / Systemic (non-local) (16%).

Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.

Search DAEN (Australia) →

SystemRegionLot data
VAERSUnited StatesLot data
Canada VigilanceCanadaNo public lot field
JADER (PMDA, Japan)JapanNo public lot field
Lareb (Netherlands)NetherlandsNo public lot field
EudraVigilanceEuropean UnionNo public lot field
VigiAccess (WHO)GlobalNo public lot field
Yellow Card (UK)United KingdomNo public lot field
DAEN (Australia)AustraliaNo public lot field

All global data sources → · Data schemas →

Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)

Curated findings for Hib conjugate vaccines from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.

ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate

The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator. Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group. These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data. Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.

○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance

CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)

Outcome: Serious outcomes in infant schedule co-administration context

Tier 2 ○ No signal detected

Hib conjugates transformed invasive Hib epidemiology. Active surveillance historically supported a favorable serious-risk profile; routine monitoring continues within combination-schedule studies rather than as a high-intensity standalone RCA focus.

Population

Infants at VSD sites

Risk interval

Study-specific

Comparison

Control intervals

Evaluation period

Post-conjugate introduction (late 1980s onward)

Method

Historical and ongoing observational monitoring of conjugate Hib products

Sources: CDC VSD

Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10

Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record. Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety); Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard); Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications. Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.

4. Documented Adverse Events

Rank-aggregated VAERS signal detection (rankv)

No pairs mapping to this product family appear in the rank-aggregated common-signal set from rankv (intersection of GPS, PRR, ROR, and BCPNN signals). That does not mean absence of all VAERS reports — only that no pair met the four-method consensus filter in the published pipeline.

  • Methods combined: BCPNN (IC), GPS/EBGM, PRR, ROR — then rank aggregation.
  • Data: ~30 years of public VAERS (rankv processed tables).
  • Origin: precisionFDA “Gaining New Insights by Detecting Adverse Event Anomalies” challenge solution.
  • Caveat: Disproportionality signals are statistical associations in spontaneous reports. They do not establish causality, incidence, or product defect. Many top pairs reflect administration/product-use coding rather than clinical injury.

Source: nanx.me/rankv · Code: github.com/nanxstats/rankv (MIT) · Built: 2026-07-30.

▶ Strong Evidence

▶ Published Evidence Does Not Support a Causal Association

5. Disease Prevention Benefits

MetricPre-Vaccine EraPost-Vaccine Era
Invasive Hib disease (annual, children <5)~20,000 cases (~40–100 per 100,000)<50 cases (<1 per 100,000) — >99% reduction
Hib meningitis (annual)~12,000 cases; leading cause of acquired intellectual disability<30 cases/year
Hib deaths (annual, children <5)~600–800<5/year

Source: CDC Pink Book; MMWR. The Hib vaccine has near-eliminated invasive Hib disease in the U.S. Vaccination also reduces nasopharyngeal carriage, providing herd protection to unvaccinated children.

Disease Burden Over Time

Reported U.S. disease burden by year. The dashed vertical line marks vaccine introduction. Hover or tap data points for values; use arrow keys when a chart has focus.

ⓘ About these charts: These are accessible SVG line charts with keyboard navigation, hover tooltips, and an underlying data table (expand below). The dashed vertical line marks the year of vaccine introduction. Reported cases undercount true incidence; case definitions, reporting practices, and diagnostic methods have changed over time. See Section 5 for additional context and pre-vs-post era comparisons.

7. Evidence Summary

Hib conjugate vaccines have been in U.S. use for >35 years with a well-established safety and effectiveness profile. Pre-licensure trials were moderate in size but post-licensure data from national surveillance and VSD are extensive. The Hib vaccine is among the most effective in the pediatric schedule, with >99% reduction in invasive disease. No significant post-licensure safety signals have been identified.

DomainEvidence Grade
Invasive Hib disease preventionStrong
Common adverse eventsStrong
Rare adverse eventsModerate

8. International Surveillance & Global Data

Quick links to public pharmacovigilance databases and trial registries relevant to Hib Vaccine. Reporting counts do not establish causality.

9. Curated Adverse Event Literature

Curated peer-reviewed literature linking specific adverse events to Hib Vaccine. Each entry is a case report, case series, or related safety publication identified via PubMed. Expand Search PubMed for additional literature below to run custom queries.

10. Key References

  1. IOM. Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality. National Academies Press; 2012. nationalacademies.org
  2. CDC. Pink Book — Hib chapter. cdc.gov/pinkbook
  3. Peltola H. Worldwide Haemophilus influenzae type b disease at the beginning of the 21st century. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(2):302–317.
  4. CDC. VSD. cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/vsd.html
  5. CDC/FDA. VAERS. vaers.hhs.gov

Part of the Open Source Medicine Foundation Network

Open Source Medicine Foundation

Home of the OSMF network — open-source pharmacovigilance tools and evidence-based medicine resources.

Research Tracker

Track peer-reviewed literature on vaccine safety, pharmacovigilance, and post-market surveillance.

SpikeProtein.site

Comprehensive resource on spike protein biology, biodistribution, and clinical implications.

VitalScan4PACVS

Decentralized trial for PACVS (post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome).

PACVS Research Summit

Annual summit convening researchers and clinicians studying post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome.