VAERS (U.S., 2006–2024): 461,098 symptom mentions (3.83/100k doses). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Injection-site / Local reaction (14%).
Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 13,174 reaction mentions in 2,244 unique reports (59.7% serious (1,340 of 2,244 reports)). Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (14%), Neurological (11%), Respiratory (11%).
JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 5,903 reaction mentions in 3,723 unique reports (10.6% serious (395 of 3,723 reports)). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (21%), Neurological (21%), General / Systemic (non-local) (16%).
VigiAccess (WHO): 1,018,882 reaction-term mentions · search: influenza. Largest share: Injection-site / Local reaction (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Other / Unclassified (13%).
Lareb (Netherlands): 18,531 reaction-term mentions · search: Influenza vaccine. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (19%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%), Musculoskeletal (12%).
DAEN (Australia): 82,948 reaction-term mentions · search: influenza. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Other / Unclassified (14%), Neurological (13%).
Medsafe (New Zealand): 46 reaction-term mentions · search: influenza. Largest share: Gastrointestinal (30%), General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Neurological (15%).
Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top VAERS: Other / Unclassified; top Canada Vigilance: General / Systemic (non-local); top JADER: Other / Unclassified.
SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, and Medsafe counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via
SurVigilance (GPL-3.0; pip install SurVigilance). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.
Pharmacovigilance Lot Signal Detection — Hypothesis-Generating Only
Multi-system context below. VAERS (U.S.) supports lot-level volume z-scores and seriousness flags by product and lot (2006–2024). Each lot links to a summary with report count, seriousness %, adverse-event pie chart, U.S. state map, and timeline. A signal flag means a statistical threshold was exceeded — not that a lot is unsafe. Full dashboard →
VAERS flags:
VOL high report volume (z ≥ 3) ·
BURST clustered in <90 days ·
SER serious reports >50%.
Lot numbers are voluntary/incomplete in VAERS. Location data is U.S. state only (no postal codes in the public extract).
VAERS (United States) — all lots by product
72,151 reports with usable lot across 6,345 lots · 1,630 flagged
Other Pharmacovigilance Systems
Lot-level analysis is only possible where reporters supply batch/lot numbers in the public extract. Canada Vigilance, JADER (PMDA, Japan), and most other national systems publish product-level spontaneous reports without lot fields.
Canada Vigilance (Health Canada)
2,244 unique reports · 13,174 reaction mentions · 59.7% serious (1,340 of 2,244 reports). Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (14%), Neurological (11%), Respiratory (11%).
Canada Vigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The public CV Online data extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible for this system — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. No Canadian dose denominators are available. Extract 2026-03-31.
Search Canada Vigilance →
JADER (PMDA, Japan)
3,723 unique reports · 5,903 reaction mentions · 10.6% serious (395 of 3,723 reports). Top categories: Other / Unclassified (21%), Neurological (21%), General / Systemic (non-local) (16%).
JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database) spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations; PMDA has not assessed causality per case. The public CSV extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. Reaction terms in source data use MedDRA/J Preferred Terms. JADER CSV extract pmdacasereport202606 (2026-06). JADER reference (PDF)
Search JADER / PMDA adverse reactions →
No EudraVigilance (EU) summary is mapped for this page.
VigiAccess (WHO)
1,018,882 MedDRA PT mentions · search: influenza. Top categories: Injection-site / Local reaction (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Other / Unclassified (13%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search VigiAccess (WHO) →
Lareb (Netherlands)
18,531 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Influenza vaccine. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (19%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%), Musculoskeletal (12%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search Lareb (Netherlands) →
DAEN (Australia)
82,948 MedDRA PT mentions · search: influenza. Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Other / Unclassified (14%), Neurological (13%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search DAEN (Australia) →
All global data sources → · Data schemas →
Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)
Curated findings for Influenza vaccines from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.
ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate
The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator.
Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs
more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group.
These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data.
Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.
○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance
CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
Outcome: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and other pre-specified outcomes
Tier 2
○ No signal detected
Seasonal influenza vaccines are monitored each year in VSD RCA. Modern seasonal formulations have not reproduced the clear GBS risk of the 1976 swine influenza program at comparable magnitude; any residual GBS association, if present, is estimated to be very small and is reassessed seasonally when signals appear.
PopulationVSD seasonal influenza vaccinees (age groups vary by season)
Risk intervalTypically ~1–42 days post-vaccination for GBS analyses
ComparisonControl intervals / background rates
Evaluation periodAnnual RCA each influenza season; historical 1976 swine-flu program informs baseline concern
MethodRapid Cycle Analysis (seasonal) and historical epidemiologic studies
Related passive AE category on this page: Neurological (see multi-system charts above — not additive with active rates).
Sources: CDC VSD · AusVaxSafety — influenza safety data
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
AusVaxSafety (Australia)
Outcome: Short-term AEFI / medical attendance after influenza vaccination
Tier 1
○ No signal detected
AusVaxSafety publishes seasonal influenza vaccine safety data from active surveys. Profiles are generally consistent with expected mild reactogenicity; check the current season page for brand-specific rates.
PopulationAustralian influenza vaccinees in AusVaxSafety sentinel programs
Risk intervalDays 0–3 (primary survey)
ComparisonSystem signal thresholds
Evaluation periodSeasonal; public pages updated during flu campaigns
MethodActive post-vaccination survey surveillance
Sources: AusVaxSafety vaccine safety data hub
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record.
Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety);
Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard);
Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications.
Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.