← All Vaccine Summaries Brought to you by the Open Source Medicine Foundation

Adult & Travel Vaccine Evidence Summary

Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine

Last updated: July 2026  ·  Status: Current U.S. licensed products reviewed

ⓘ Methodology Note

This page summarizes published clinical trial data, post-licensure surveillance findings, and peer-reviewed literature for the inactivated Vero-cell-derived Japanese encephalitis vaccine (IXIARO), the vaccine licensed and used in the United States. Live-attenuated SA14-14-2 JE vaccine, used in several Asian national immunization programs, is discussed for context but is not licensed in the U.S.

1. Basic Information

Disease Overview

Recommended Use

PopulationRecommendation
Travelers ≥1 month in endemic rural areas during transmission season2-dose primary series, days 0 and 28 (accelerated 1-week schedule available for adults 18–65)
Shorter-term travelers with high-risk activitiesOutdoor/rural/agricultural exposure, or uncertain itinerary, may still warrant vaccination per individualized risk assessment
BoosterSingle booster at ≥1 year if ongoing/future JE exposure risk continues
Age range (U.S. product)Licensed for age ≥2 months

Source: CDC Yellow Book; ACIP JE vaccine recommendations (2019 update).

Licensed Products

2. Pre-Licensure Clinical Trial Data

IXIARO's licensure was supported by immunogenicity (non-inferiority to the older JE-VAX) and safety trials in adults and children across the U.S., Europe, and endemic Asian countries.

MetricDataEvidence Strength
Seroconversion after 2-dose primary series>95% across adult and pediatric immunogenicity trialsStrong
Pediatric safety database~JE-endemic-country pediatric trials totaling several thousand children supported the 2013 pediatric licensureModerate
Direct clinical efficacy (disease endpoint) trialNot conducted (immunogenicity-based licensure, standard for JE vaccines given low absolute incidence in any single trial population)Limited

Key Limitations

3. Post-Licensure Safety Data

Post-Licensure Safety Monitoring

A CDC/FDA review of VAERS reports from IXIARO's first several years on the U.S. market (2013 review covering 2009–2012) did not identify an unusual or unexpected adverse event pattern compared to other inactivated travel vaccines.

MetricFinding
VAERS review (2009–2012 U.S. data)No unusual safety signal identified; reports dominated by injection site and mild systemic reactions
Comparison to older JE-VAXIXIARO has a substantially improved reactogenicity and allergy profile compared to the discontinued mouse-brain-derived JE-VAX, which had higher rates of delayed urticarial/allergic reactions

⚠ Critical Caveat

VAERS data represent unverified reports temporally associated with vaccination and cannot establish causality or incidence rates on their own.

4. Documented Adverse Events — Evidence of Association

▶ Strong Evidence of Causal Association

▶ Moderate or Preliminary Evidence

5. Disease Prevention Benefits

Program Impact (Endemic-Country Live-Vaccine Programs)

Country/ProgramOutcome
China (SA14-14-2, national EPI)Routine childhood JE vaccination since the 1980s–2000s associated with major declines in reported pediatric JE incidence
India (endemic districts)Campaign and routine SA14-14-2 vaccination in high-burden districts associated with sharp reductions in encephalitis hospitalizations attributable to JE
Traveler protection (IXIARO)No large-scale traveler effectiveness studies exist due to the rarity of JE in short-term travelers, but seroprotection correlates strongly predict clinical protection based on decades of field experience with JE vaccines generally

Source: WHO JE position paper (2015); national surveillance summaries (China CDC, India NVBDCP).

6. Evidence Summary

IXIARO provides strong, well-documented immunogenicity against a disease with high case-fatality and disability among the small fraction of infections that become symptomatic. Its safety profile is favorable and represents a substantial improvement over the discontinued mouse-brain-derived predecessor vaccine. The main evidence gap, shared by most travel vaccines, is the absence of a direct disease-endpoint efficacy trial.

DomainEvidence GradeKey Finding
ImmunogenicityStrong>95% seroconversion after 2-dose series
ReactogenicityStrongMostly mild, self-limited local/systemic reactions
Direct efficacy (disease endpoint)LimitedLicensure based on immunogenicity, not disease-endpoint RCT
Serious safety signalNo AssociationNo unusual pattern in post-licensure VAERS review

7. Key References

  1. WHO. Japanese encephalitis vaccines: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90(9):69–87.
  2. CDC. Japanese Encephalitis. CDC Yellow Book, Travelers’ Health. cdc.gov/yellowbook
  3. Hills SL, et al. Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine: Recommendations of ACIP. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2019;68(2):1–33.
  4. Schuller E, et al. Long-term immunogenicity of the new Vero cell-derived, inactivated Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine. Vaccine. 2008;26(37):4382–4386.