← All Vaccine Summaries Brought to you by the Open Source Medicine Foundation

Adult & Travel Vaccine Evidence Summary

Rabies Vaccine Side Effects (In Humans — Post-Exposure & Pre-Exposure Data)

This page answers “rabies vaccine side effects” with sourced pharmacovigilance data — VAERS reports and curated case literature. Counts are database reports, not proven vaccine-caused injury rates.

Look up a vaccine lot or batch number in VAERS →

Last updated: July 2026  ·  Status: Current U.S. licensed products reviewed

ⓘ Methodology Note

This page summarizes published clinical trial data, post-licensure surveillance findings, and peer-reviewed literature for cell-culture rabies vaccines used for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP): human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV, Imovax Rabies) and purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV, RabAvert).

1. Basic Information

Disease Overview

Pre- and Post-Exposure Regimens

RegimenWhoSchedule
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Travelers to high-risk areas, veterinarians, animal handlers, lab workers, spelunkers2-dose series (days 0, 7) per 2022 ACIP update, reduced from the older 3-dose series for most people; occupational-risk groups undergo periodic titer checks and booster as needed
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), previously unvaccinatedAnyone with a bite/scratch/mucous-membrane exposure to a potentially rabid animal4-dose vaccine series (days 0, 3, 7, 14; 5th dose on day 28 if immunocompromised) plus rabies immune globulin (RIG) infiltrated at the wound site
PEP, previously vaccinated (PrEP or prior PEP)Same as above, with documented prior vaccination2-dose booster series (days 0, 3); no RIG needed

Source: CDC ACIP Rabies Recommendations (2022 update); WHO Rabies position paper (2018).

Licensed Products (U.S.)

Ingredients (Package Insert)

Structured composition for 1 branded product covered on this page, taken from FDA-approved package inserts (DailyMed / manufacturer prescribing information). Lists are per product — formulations differ by manufacturer and presentation. Click an ingredient name to open its safety-context page when available.

Inactivated Intramuscular (IM) No preservative (typical single-dose) Neomycin
Imovax Rabies Sanofi Pasteur · Inactivated

Delivery

Route: Intramuscular (IM)

Form: Lyophilized powder (reconstitute)

Dose volume: 1 mL

Presentation: single-dose vial + diluent

Encapsulation / delivery vehicle

None (no nanoparticle/VLP encapsulation system)

Antigens

AntigenTypeAmount / dose
Rabies virus antigen (β-propiolactone inactivated)
Strain: PM-1503-3M · System: MRC-5 human diploid cells
Inactivated virus≥2.5 IU

Adjuvants

None listed on the package insert for this product (common for live attenuated and some inactivated whole-virus vaccines).

Preservatives

  • None — Single-dose presentation; label states no preservative.

Excipients & residuals

IngredientCategoryAmountRole
Human albuminStabilizer<100 mgstabilizer
Neomycin sulfateResidual (antibiotic)<150 mcgresidual
Phenol red indicatorOther20 mcgindicator

Source: FDA package insert · Verified 2026-07-09

ⓘ How to read this section

Ingredient lists are sourced from official package inserts for the specific brands named above. Formulations can change between lots and over time — verify against the current label before any clinical decision. Presence of a substance does not by itself indicate harm; toxicology is dose-, route-, and context-dependent. Browse the full ingredient database: Vaccine Ingredients index.

Causality assessment & potential mechanisms

Conditions below combine WHO-style causality levels with potential biological mechanisms from the site mechanism catalog (ae_mechanisms_catalog.json). HRSA VICP table listing (where shown) indicates a compensable temporal association under U.S. program rules — not automatic proof of causation for every case. Mechanisms are hypothesis-level pathways with graded evidence.

Condition Time window Causality Potential mechanism(s)
Anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity 0–1 days Possible

Evidence: Moderate

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis) (primary · hypersensitivity)

Pre-existing or newly formed IgE against vaccine antigens or excipients (e.g., gelatin, egg proteins, PEG, polysorbate) triggers mast-cell and basophil degranulation with systemic mediator release.

Local/systemic reactogenicity 0–3 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

Adjuvant-driven local and systemic reactogenicity (primary · innate_inflammation)

Aluminum or other adjuvants (e.g., AS01B) amplify innate immune signaling, producing injection-site inflammation and transient systemic symptoms (fever, myalgia, fatigue).

Neurologic events (historical neural-tissue vaccines) 0–42 days Unlikely

Evidence: Low

Molecular mimicry → Guillain-Barré syndrome (hypothetical · molecular_mimicry)

Vaccine- or infection-triggered immune responses cross-react with peripheral-nerve gangliosides or myelin components, producing demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy.

Temporal association — mechanism unknown (alternative · unknown)

Reports show temporal clustering after vaccination but a specific pathogenic pathway is not established; alternative (coincidental) explanations remain plausible.

SIRVA 0–2 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

SIRVA — incorrect injection into shoulder structures (primary · procedural)

Needle placement into the subdeltoid/subacromial bursa or joint rather than deltoid muscle causes prolonged local inflammation and restricted range of motion (procedural, not antigen-specific).

Framework: WHO causality + HRSA VICP (where applicable) + AE mechanism catalog. Last updated: 2026-07-18. Schema: schemas/vaccine_injury_table.schema.json · Mechanisms: schemas/ae_mechanism.schema.json. Not medical or legal advice.

2. Pre-Licensure Clinical Trial Data

Licensure trial design (ICAN / OpenVAERS)

This vaccine is not listed in ICAN’s childhood-schedule No Placebo Table (which covers CDC routine pediatric injectable products). Pre-licensure trial comparators for travel, adult, or specialty vaccines should be taken from FDA review documents and product labels in the sections below.

Source: OpenVAERS — No Placebo Table · ICAN original PDF · Attribution: Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) via OpenVAERS · Last fetched: 2026-07-16. For many trials listing '6 months' safety review, ICAN notes review was typically ~30 days post-injection with a phone call at 6 months.

Because deliberately exposing trial participants to rabies would be unethical, efficacy cannot be studied via placebo-controlled challenge trials in humans. Evidence instead comes from immunogenicity trials, and from the extensive real-world record of PEP outcomes.

MetricDataEvidence Strength
Seroconversion (adequate neutralizing antibody titer)>95–99% after complete PrEP or PEP series in immunogenicity trialsStrong
2-dose vs. 3-dose PrEP non-inferiority (2022 ACIP change)Multiple immunogenicity studies supported the shift to a 2-dose primary PrEP series for most peopleStrong
Direct PEP effectivenessNo RCTs (unethical); real-world record across millions of PEP courses shows treatment failures are exceedingly rare and almost always tied to delayed/incomplete PEP or omission of RIGStrong

Key Limitations

3. Post-Licensure Safety Data

Post-Licensure Safety Monitoring

MetricFinding
Serum sickness-like reactions with booster dosesReported in up to ~6% of people receiving multiple HDCV boosters, thought to be an immune-complex reaction to the human albumin stabilizer; more common with older vaccine lots and repeat boosting than with primary series
Historical GBS-like reactions with older nerve-tissue vaccinesOlder Semple-type (nerve-tissue-derived) rabies vaccines, still used in some countries decades ago, carried a much higher neurologic complication rate; modern cell-culture vaccines (HDCV, PCECV) do not share this risk profile
VAERS review, modern cell-culture vaccinesDominated by injection site and mild systemic reactions; no unusual serious safety signal identified

⚠ Critical Caveat

Rabies is essentially always fatal once symptomatic, and PEP is highly time-sensitive. Any potential rabies exposure warrants urgent medical evaluation regardless of prior vaccination status — do not wait for confirmatory animal testing where risk is significant.

Passive Surveillance: AE Type Breakdown (Multi-System)

Side-by-side view of U.S. VAERS, Health Canada Canada Vigilance, Japan JADER (PMDA), EU EudraVigilance, and live-scraped international systems via SurVigilance (VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, Medsafe). SurVigilance panels show MedDRA PT mention totals (not individual-case counts). Category assignment uses keyword matching — approximate, not official SOC coding. VAERS ZIP CAPTCHA downloads use this site’s vaers_pipeline.py; FAERS is bulk quarterly ZIP via SurVigilance (not product search).

VAERS (United States)

Canada Vigilance (Canada)

JADER (PMDA, Japan)

EudraVigilance (EU)

5,183
individual cases · adrreports.eu DAP export (up to 28/06/2026)
Reaction SOC breakdown not included in this workbook export.

SurVigilance: VigiAccess · Lareb · DAEN · DMA · Medsafe

VigiAccess (WHO)

Lareb (Netherlands)

DAEN (Australia)

No DAEN (Australia) data yet — run python scrape_survigilance_one.py daen <vaccine-id> or python survigilance_pipeline.py --system daen (SurVigilance + direct scrapers: GitHub).

DMA (Denmark)

Denmark DMA interactive ADR search is currently offline (Danish Medicines Agency IT transition; public overviews frozen at 12 Mar 2024). Live product PT tables cannot be retrieved until DKMA restores the search. See DKMA notice. Denmark continues to report into EU EudraVigilance (panel above).

Medsafe (New Zealand)

VAERS (U.S., 2006–2024): 11,195 symptom mentions (rate N/A — no U.S. dose denominator for this vaccine). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (22%), General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Neurological (16%). Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 659 reaction mentions in 200 unique reports (33.5% serious (67 of 200 reports)). Largest share: Injection-site / Local reaction (15%), Allergic / Anaphylactic (14%), General / Systemic (non-local) (14%). JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 23 reaction mentions in 21 unique reports (0.0% serious (0 of 21 reports)). Largest share: Allergic / Anaphylactic (57%), Neurological (26%), Other / Unclassified (13%). EudraVigilance (EU DAP export): 5,183 individual cases (up to 28/06/2026). Reaction SOC categories were not exported in the local DAP workbooks — case count only. VigiAccess (WHO): 47,129 reaction-term mentions · search: rabies. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Neurological (15%), Other / Unclassified (13%). Lareb (Netherlands): 1,214 reaction-term mentions · search: Rabies vaccine. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (30%), Neurological (15%), Musculoskeletal (14%). Medsafe (New Zealand): 220 reaction-term mentions · search: rabies. Largest share: Neurological (18%), Musculoskeletal (15%), General / Systemic (non-local) (14%). Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top VAERS: Other / Unclassified; top Canada Vigilance: Injection-site / Local reaction; top JADER: Allergic / Anaphylactic. SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, and Medsafe counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0; pip install SurVigilance). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.

Compare AE patterns across all vaccines →

4. Documented Adverse Events — Evidence of Association

Rank-aggregated VAERS signal detection (rankv)

No pairs mapping to this product family appear in the rank-aggregated common-signal set from rankv (intersection of GPS, PRR, ROR, and BCPNN signals). That does not mean absence of all VAERS reports — only that no pair met the four-method consensus filter in the published pipeline.

  • Methods combined: BCPNN (IC), GPS/EBGM, PRR, ROR — then rank aggregation.
  • Data: ~30 years of public VAERS (rankv processed tables).
  • Origin: precisionFDA “Gaining New Insights by Detecting Adverse Event Anomalies” challenge solution.
  • Caveat: Disproportionality signals are statistical associations in spontaneous reports. They do not establish causality, incidence, or product defect. Many top pairs reflect administration/product-use coding rather than clinical injury.

Source: nanx.me/rankv · Code: github.com/nanxstats/rankv (MIT) · Built: 2026-07-30.

▶ Strong Evidence of Causal Association

▶ Published Evidence Does Not Support a Causal Association

5. Disease Prevention Benefits

Effectiveness in Practice

MetricData
PEP effectiveness when protocol followed correctly and promptlyEssentially 100%; documented human rabies deaths after correctly and promptly administered PEP (vaccine + RIG) are exceedingly rare case reports
Global mortality burden~59,000 deaths/year worldwide (WHO estimate), >95% in Asia and Africa, overwhelmingly linked to dog bites in areas with limited PEP access
U.S. burdenTypically 1–3 human deaths/year, almost always from unrecognized bat exposure without PEP; PEP is administered to tens of thousands of people annually in the U.S. as a precaution

Source: WHO Rabies Fact Sheet; CDC Rabies Surveillance Summaries.

6. Evidence Summary

Modern cell-culture rabies vaccines, combined with rabies immune globulin for unvaccinated exposures, are considered essentially 100% effective at preventing a disease that is otherwise almost universally fatal once symptomatic. The main real-world "failures" reflect delayed or incomplete treatment rather than vaccine performance. Adverse events are generally mild, with serum sickness-like reactions to repeat boosters being the most distinctive, well-characterized reaction pattern.

DomainEvidence GradeKey Finding
PEP effectiveness (protocol followed)StrongEssentially 100% when given promptly and completely
PrEP immunogenicityStrong>95–99% seroconversion
Serum sickness-like reactions (repeat boosters)StrongUp to ~6% with repeat HDCV boosting
GBS (modern vaccines)No AssociationSignal specific to older nerve-tissue vaccines, not HDCV/PCECV

7. International Surveillance & Global Data

Quick links to public pharmacovigilance databases and trial registries relevant to Rabies Vaccine. Reporting counts do not establish causality.

8. Curated Adverse Event Literature

Curated peer-reviewed literature linking specific adverse events to Rabies Vaccine. Each entry is a case report, case series, or related safety publication identified via PubMed. Expand Search PubMed for additional literature below to run custom queries.

9. Key References

  1. WHO. Rabies vaccines: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2018;93(16):201–219.
  2. CDC. Use of a Modified Preexposure Prophylaxis Vaccination Schedule for Rabies. MMWR. 2022;71(18):619–627.
  3. CDC. Rabies. CDC Yellow Book, Travelers’ Health. cdc.gov/yellowbook
  4. Manning SE, et al. Human Rabies Prevention — ACIP Recommendations. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57(RR-3):1–28.
  5. WHO. Rabies Fact Sheet. who.int

Part of the Open Source Medicine Foundation Network

Open Source Medicine Foundation

Home of the OSMF network — open-source pharmacovigilance tools and evidence-based medicine resources.

Research Tracker

Track peer-reviewed literature on vaccine safety, pharmacovigilance, and post-market surveillance.

SpikeProtein.site

Comprehensive resource on spike protein biology, biodistribution, and clinical implications.

VitalScan4PACVS

Decentralized trial for PACVS (post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome).

PACVS Research Summit

Annual summit convening researchers and clinicians studying post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome.