Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 11,067 reaction mentions in 3,417 unique reports (64.0% serious (2,186 of 3,417 reports)). Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Injection-site / Local reaction (17%), Neurological (10%).
JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 1,313 reaction mentions in 666 unique reports (8.1% serious (54 of 666 reports)). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (35%), Neurological (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%).
VigiAccess (WHO): 1,395 reaction-term mentions · search: varicella. Largest share: Gastrointestinal (26%), Dermatological (non-injection-site) (18%), Other / Unclassified (12%).
Lareb (Netherlands): 80 reaction-term mentions · search: Varicella vaccine. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Other / Unclassified (16%), Injection-site / Local reaction (15%).
Medsafe (New Zealand): 569 reaction-term mentions · search: varicella. Largest share: Injection-site / Local reaction (23%), General / Systemic (non-local) (21%), Other / Unclassified (17%).
Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top Canada Vigilance: General / Systemic (non-local); top JADER: Other / Unclassified.
SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, and Medsafe counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via
SurVigilance (GPL-3.0; pip install SurVigilance). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.
Pharmacovigilance Lot Signal Detection — Hypothesis-Generating Only
Multi-system context below. VAERS (U.S.) supports lot-level volume z-scores and seriousness flags by product and lot (2006–2024). Each lot links to a summary with report count, seriousness %, adverse-event pie chart, U.S. state map, and timeline. A signal flag means a statistical threshold was exceeded — not that a lot is unsafe. Full dashboard →
VAERS flags:
VOL high report volume (z ≥ 3) ·
BURST clustered in <90 days ·
SER serious reports >50%.
Lot numbers are voluntary/incomplete in VAERS. Location data is U.S. state only (no postal codes in the public extract).
VAERS (United States) — all lots by product
57,254 reports with usable lot across 4,317 lots · 511 flagged
Other Pharmacovigilance Systems
Lot-level analysis is only possible where reporters supply batch/lot numbers in the public extract. Canada Vigilance, JADER (PMDA, Japan), and most other national systems publish product-level spontaneous reports without lot fields.
Canada Vigilance (Health Canada)
3,417 unique reports · 11,067 reaction mentions · 64.0% serious (2,186 of 3,417 reports). Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Injection-site / Local reaction (17%), Neurological (10%).
Canada Vigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The public CV Online data extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible for this system — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. No Canadian dose denominators are available. Extract 2026-03-31.
Search Canada Vigilance →
JADER (PMDA, Japan)
666 unique reports · 1,313 reaction mentions · 8.1% serious (54 of 666 reports). Top categories: Other / Unclassified (35%), Neurological (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%).
JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database) spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations; PMDA has not assessed causality per case. The public CSV extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. Reaction terms in source data use MedDRA/J Preferred Terms. JADER CSV extract pmdacasereport202606 (2026-06). JADER reference (PDF)
Search JADER / PMDA adverse reactions →
No EudraVigilance (EU) summary is mapped for this page.
VigiAccess (WHO)
1,395 MedDRA PT mentions · search: varicella. Top categories: Gastrointestinal (26%), Dermatological (non-injection-site) (18%), Other / Unclassified (12%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search VigiAccess (WHO) →
Lareb (Netherlands)
80 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Varicella vaccine. Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Other / Unclassified (16%), Injection-site / Local reaction (15%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search Lareb (Netherlands) →
All global data sources → · Data schemas →
Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)
Curated findings for Varicella (Varivax) / context with MMRV from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.
ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate
The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator.
Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs
more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group.
These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data.
Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.
○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance
CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
Outcome: Febrile seizures (especially MMRV first dose) and other pre-specified outcomes
Tier 2
● Signal confirmed (true association)
When varicella is combined as MMRV for the first toddler dose, VSD confirmed higher febrile-seizure risk versus separate injections. Standalone varicella vaccine does not drive that specific combination finding; see MMR page for MMRV detail.
PopulationToddlers receiving varicella-containing vaccines
Risk interval5–12 days for febrile seizure analyses with measles-containing vaccines
ComparisonSeparate MMR + varicella
Evaluation periodPost-licensure combination era
MethodRCA and observational studies (including MMRV combination analyses)
Related passive AE category on this page: Neurological (see multi-system charts above — not additive with active rates).
Sources: Klein NP et al. Pediatrics 2010 — MMRV febrile seizures
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record.
Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety);
Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard);
Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications.
Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.
Rank-aggregated VAERS signal detection (rankv)
The table below lists vaccine–event pairs that were detected as disproportionality signals by all four base methods used in rankv (GPS, PRR, ROR, BCPNN) on multi-decade VAERS data, then ordered by rank aggregation (Borda average rank; related to the Spearman/GA top-list approach in the rankv paper).
| Agg. rank |
VAERS product |
Preferred term (event) |
N |
Method ranks (GPS / PRR / ROR / BCPNN) |
| 261 |
VARICELLA (NO BRAND NAME) |
Varicella post vaccine
clinical-coded PT
|
93 |
GPS rank 247 (EBGM=6.75); PRR rank 248 (PRR=11.2307); ROR rank 248 (ROR=11.3313); BCPNN rank 224 (IC_LB=2.9979) |
| 282 |
VARICELLA (VARIVAX) |
Abortion
clinical-coded PT
|
104 |
GPS rank 268 (EBGM=6.36); PRR rank 257 (PRR=11.0222); ROR rank 258 (ROR=11.0279); BCPNN rank 284 (IC_LB=2.426) |
Showing up to 15 pairs for this page (clinical-coded terms listed first).
Full processed tables: rankv_signals.json.
- Methods combined: BCPNN (IC), GPS/EBGM, PRR, ROR — then rank aggregation.
- Data: ~30 years of public VAERS (rankv processed tables).
- Origin: precisionFDA “Gaining New Insights by Detecting Adverse Event Anomalies” challenge solution.
- Caveat: Disproportionality signals are statistical associations in spontaneous reports. They do not establish causality, incidence, or product defect. Many top pairs reflect administration/product-use coding rather than clinical injury.
Source: nanx.me/rankv
· Code: github.com/nanxstats/rankv (MIT)
· Built: 2026-07-30.