← All Vaccine Summaries Brought to you by the Open Source Medicine Foundation

Vaccine Evidence Summary

Chickenpox (Varicella) Vaccine Side Effects (Varicella — Trial & Surveillance Evidence)

This page answers “chickenpox vaccine side effects” with sourced pharmacovigilance data — MMRV febrile-seizure context and VAERS breakdowns. Counts are database reports, not proven vaccine-caused injury rates.

Look up a vaccine lot or batch number in VAERS →

Last updated: July 2026 · Status: Current U.S. licensed product reviewed

ⓘ Methodology Note

This page summarizes published data for varicella vaccine (Varivax®) and the MMRV combination vaccine (ProQuad®). The U.S. introduced universal 1-dose varicella vaccination in 1995 and added a 2nd dose in 2006 due to breakthrough disease. MMRV was licensed in 2005. An important safety finding for MMRV (but not MMR + varicella given separately) is an elevated febrile seizure risk in the 5–12 day window. Data are presented without interpretive language that implies the vaccine is "safe" or "unsafe."

1. Basic Information

Disease Protected Against

Varicella (Chickenpox) is caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV). Before vaccination, varicella caused ~4 million cases, ~10,500–13,500 hospitalizations, and ~100–150 deaths annually in the U.S. Complications include bacterial superinfection (primarily Group A Strep), pneumonia, encephalitis, and congenital varicella syndrome. VZV establishes latency in dorsal root ganglia; reactivation later in life causes herpes zoster (shingles).

CDC Schedule (U.S., 2025)

DoseAgeProduct
Dose 112–15 monthsVarivax (standalone) or ProQuad (MMRV)
Dose 24–6 yearsVarivax or ProQuad. Minimum interval: 3 months between doses.

Source: CDC ACIP, 2025 schedule. ACIP recommends MMR + varicella separately for dose 1 in children 12–47 months due to MMRV febrile seizure risk; MMRV may be used for dose 2 or for dose 1 in children ≥48 months.

Documented Adverse Events (HRSA VICP)

The following adverse events are documented by the HRSA Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) as having a temporal relationship to this vaccine. These are not necessarily confirmed causal relationships, but rather conditions for which claims have been compensated or are presumed caused by the vaccine.

WHO Causality Assessment Methodology

The World Health Organization's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) uses a 4-level causality classification:

  • Consistent: Epidemiological studies demonstrate a statistically significant association with temporal specificity and biological plausibility. Replicated across independent populations and study designs.
  • Indeterminate: Evidence exists but is insufficient to confirm or rule out causality. May be limited by sample size, confounding, or inconsistency across studies.
  • Inconsistent: Studies have not demonstrated a consistent or convincing association. Evidence against causality outweighs evidence for it.
  • Unclassifiable: Insufficient data to reach any conclusion. Requires further evidence.

Source: WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS), 2021–2025 causality review cycles. See also Institute of Medicine (IOM) Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality (2012) for pre-COVID vaccine assessments.

Condition Time Window Causality Level HRSA Description
Anaphylaxis 0-1 days Consistent
WHO Determination (2021, 2023): Consistent for all COVID-19 vaccines. Rate: ~2–5 per million doses. Temporal specificity (onset within minutes, consistent with IgE-mediated). Plausible biological mechanism: immediate hypersensitivity to vaccine excipients (PEG for mRNA, polysorbate for adenoviral). Verified via passive surveillance convergence across multiple national systems (VAERS, EudraVigilance, MHRA Yellow Card, TGA DAEN).
Biological Mechanism: Not thought to be spike protein mediated; likely polyethylene glycol (PEG) in mRNA vaccines triggers IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation
Clinical Evidence: (Kuder et al., 2021); Mechanism: (Risma et al., 2021)
Spike Protein Evidence: Not tested
Anaphylaxis occurring within 4 hours following vaccination
Vaccine Strain Varicella (Disseminated) 0-42 days Indeterminate
WHO / IOM Causality Assessment: Evidence reviewed; causal association cannot be confirmed or excluded at current evidence level. Requires further epidemiological and mechanistic investigation. See HRSA VICP Table for program-specific determination.
Biological Mechanism: Multiple plausible biological mechanisms under investigation. Brighton Collaboration AESI monitoring ongoing.
Clinical Evidence: See HRSA VICP/CICP program documentation for current determination.
Spike Protein Evidence: Evidence reviewed; consult Brighton Collaboration list for mechanistic assessment status.
Vaccine strain varicella (disseminated) within 42 days of vaccination
Herpes Zoster (Shingles) 0-365 days Indeterminate
WHO / IOM Causality Assessment: Evidence reviewed; causal association cannot be confirmed or excluded at current evidence level. Requires further epidemiological and mechanistic investigation. See HRSA VICP Table for program-specific determination.
Biological Mechanism: Multiple plausible biological mechanisms under investigation. Brighton Collaboration AESI monitoring ongoing.
Clinical Evidence: See HRSA VICP/CICP program documentation for current determination.
Spike Protein Evidence: Evidence reviewed; consult Brighton Collaboration list for mechanistic assessment status.
Herpes zoster (caused by vaccine strain virus) within 12 months of vaccination

Important Notes

  • HRSA VICP: Conditions listed are documented by HRSA as having temporal relationship to vaccination. Compensation does not imply causation.
  • Temporal Association: These conditions occurred after vaccination within the specified time window, but other factors may have contributed.
  • Rarity: Most adverse events are extremely rare. Serious adverse events from vaccines occur in roughly 1-2 per million doses.
  • Biological Plausibility: Mechanistic evidence is under review and will be integrated in Q3 2026.
  • Benefit-Risk: This page documents documented injuries. See disease burden pages for context on prevented diseases.

Ingredients (Package Insert)

Structured composition for 1 branded product covered on this page, taken from FDA-approved package inserts (DailyMed / manufacturer prescribing information). Lists are per product — formulations differ by manufacturer and presentation. Click an ingredient name to open its safety-context page when available.

Live attenuated IM or SC No preservative (typical single-dose) Gelatin Neomycin
Varivax Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Live attenuated

Delivery

Route: IM or SC

Form: Lyophilized powder (reconstitute)

Dose volume: 0.5 mL

Presentation: single-dose vial + sterile diluent

Encapsulation / delivery vehicle

None (no nanoparticle/VLP encapsulation system)

Antigens

AntigenTypeAmount / dose
Varicella-zoster virus (live, attenuated)
Strain: Oka/Merck · System: MRC-5 cells
Live attenuated virus≥1350 PFU per 0.5 mL

Adjuvants

None listed on the package insert for this product (common for live attenuated and some inactivated whole-virus vaccines).

Preservatives

  • None — Single-dose presentation; label states no preservative.

Excipients & residuals

IngredientCategoryAmountRole
SucroseStabilizer≈24 mgstabilizer
Hydrolyzed gelatinStabilizer≈12.0 mgstabilizer
Sodium chlorideBuffer≈3.1 mgtonicity
Monosodium L-glutamateStabilizer≈0.5 mgstabilizer
Sodium phosphate dibasicBuffer≈0.44 mgbuffer
Potassium phosphate monobasicBuffer≈0.08 mgbuffer
Potassium chlorideBuffer≈0.08 mgbuffer
MRC-5 residual DNA/proteinResidual (manufacturing)tracecell-substrate residual
NeomycinResidual (antibiotic)traceresidual
Fetal bovine serumResidual (manufacturing)traceresidual
EDTAResidual (manufacturing)traceprocess residual

Source: DailyMed · Verified 2026-07-09

ⓘ How to read this section

Ingredient lists are sourced from official package inserts for the specific brands named above. Formulations can change between lots and over time — verify against the current label before any clinical decision. Presence of a substance does not by itself indicate harm; toxicology is dose-, route-, and context-dependent. Browse the full ingredient database: Vaccine Ingredients index.

Causality assessment & potential mechanisms

Conditions below combine WHO-style causality levels with potential biological mechanisms from the site mechanism catalog (ae_mechanisms_catalog.json). HRSA VICP table listing (where shown) indicates a compensable temporal association under U.S. program rules — not automatic proof of causation for every case. Mechanisms are hypothesis-level pathways with graded evidence.

Condition Time window Causality Potential mechanism(s)
Anaphylaxis HRSA table 0–1 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis) (primary · hypersensitivity)

Pre-existing or newly formed IgE against vaccine antigens or excipients (e.g., gelatin, egg proteins, PEG, polysorbate) triggers mast-cell and basophil degranulation with systemic mediator release.

Vaccine-strain varicella (disseminated) HRSA table 0–42 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

Uncontrolled live attenuated vaccine replication (primary · live_replication)

In immunocompromised or otherwise susceptible hosts, live attenuated vaccine strains can replicate beyond the intended limited infection, causing disseminated disease or organ-specific infection.

Herpes zoster (vaccine strain) HRSA table 0–365 days Possible

Evidence: Moderate

Uncontrolled live attenuated vaccine replication (primary · live_replication)

In immunocompromised or otherwise susceptible hosts, live attenuated vaccine strains can replicate beyond the intended limited infection, causing disseminated disease or organ-specific infection.

Febrile seizure (especially MMRV) 5–12 days Very likely / Probable

Evidence: High

Fever-triggered seizure (primary · innate_inflammation)

Vaccine-induced fever lowers seizure threshold in susceptible young children; measles-containing vaccines show a well-documented risk window roughly 7–14 days post-dose.

Framework: WHO causality + HRSA VICP (where applicable) + AE mechanism catalog. Last updated: 2026-07-18. Schema: schemas/vaccine_injury_table.schema.json · Mechanisms: schemas/ae_mechanism.schema.json. Not medical or legal advice.

2. Pre-Licensure Clinical Trial Data

Licensure trial design (ICAN / OpenVAERS)

The table below reproduces ICAN’s No Placebo Table rows for U.S. childhood-schedule products relevant to this page — including the control/comparator used in FDA licensing trials (not always saline placebo). OSMF presents this for transparency; it is not an endorsement of ICAN interpretations.

Vaccine Brand Manufacturer Doses (schedule) Ages injected Control / comparator Placebo Safety review window
VARVarivaxMerck212M 4Y45 mg of neomycin per milliliterNo70 days

Source: OpenVAERS — No Placebo Table · ICAN original PDF · Attribution: Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) via OpenVAERS · Last fetched: 2026-07-16. For many trials listing '6 months' safety review, ICAN notes review was typically ~30 days post-injection with a phone call at 6 months.

Varivax was licensed in 1995 based on clinical trials in ~11,000 children and adults. The pivotal efficacy trial enrolled ~1,000 children. ProQuad (MMRV) was licensed in 2005 based on trials in ~6,000 children.

MetricData
Pre-licensure safety database (Varivax)~11,000 individuals
Efficacy (1 dose)~85% (all varicella); ~97% (severe varicella)
Efficacy (2 doses)~98% (all varicella); near-100% (severe varicella)
Most common reactionsInjection site reactions (~20–30%), fever (~10–15%), varicella-like rash (~3–5%, may be infectious)

MMRV Febrile Seizure Finding

The MMRV pre-licensure trials observed a higher rate of fever (38–40%) and a numerically higher rate of febrile seizures compared to MMR + varicella given separately. The febrile seizure risk was confirmed post-licensure in VSD studies: ~1 additional febrile seizure per 1,250 MMRV doses compared to MMR + varicella given separately, in the 5–12 day post-vaccination window. This led to the ACIP preference for separate MMR + varicella for dose 1.

3. Post-Licensure Safety Data

Varicella vaccine has >30 years of post-licensure safety data. Key VSD findings:

⚠ Critical Caveat

VAERS data represent unverified reports. A report to VAERS does not mean the vaccine caused the event.

VAERS Reporting Data — Halma & Varon (2025), DARE-SAFE

The DARE-SAFE paper (Halma & Varon, Pharmacoepidemiology 2025, CC BY 4.0) analyzed VAERS reports for vaccines administered in the United States from 2006–2022. The following data are extracted from Table 1 of that paper for this vaccine (Varicella standalone (Varivax); excludes MMRV (MMR-Varicella combination, which had 15,668 reports / 20 deaths / 42.9M doses / 0.0466 death rate)):

MetricValue
U.S. doses administered (2006–2022)143,906,028
Total VAERS AE reports48,863
AE reporting rate (per 100,000 doses)34.0
Total death reports84
Death reporting rate (per 100,000 doses)0.0584
AE-to-Death ratio582:1

Source: Halma, M.; Varon, J. DARE-SAFE. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/pharma4020007. CC BY 4.0. Data from Table 1.

📚 Important Interpretive Caveats (from the paper itself)

  • Reporting rate ≠ incidence rate. VAERS is a passive, unverified system. A report means someone submitted a claim of temporal association, not a confirmed causal event. The paper is explicit that causality cannot be inferred from these numbers alone.
  • Reporting behavior is not uniform. More serious, unusual, or media-salient events are reported at much higher rates than mild ones. Products receiving more public, media, legal, and clinical attention (particularly COVID-19 vaccines, which also benefited from V-safe active-surveillance prompts and CICP compensation pathways) generate more reports per dose regardless of true risk.
  • Age and comorbidity confounding is not adjusted. COVID-19 vaccines were disproportionately administered to elderly and comorbid populations (nursing homes, 65+, high-risk groups in early 2021) with much higher background all-cause mortality than the general child/working-age population. Some fraction of temporally-associated deaths would occur regardless of vaccination, and the paper does not perform a background-rate comparison.
  • Stimulated reporting is a known, documented phenomenon. Media coverage, plaintiff attorney solicitation, and advocacy campaigns — all independently inflate VAERS reporting propensity. The paper cites this literature but does not correct for it.
  • Small-denominator rows are unreliable. Rates computed from small denominators (e.g., monovalent measles, DT, mumps, rubella) have enormous statistical uncertainty and should not be compared to vaccines with hundreds of millions of administered doses without noting the wide confidence intervals.

Source: Halma, M.; Varon, J. DARE-SAFE: Denominator-Adjusted Rate Estimates of Substance Adverse Events Frequency Evaluation in Pharmaceuticals and Vaccines. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025, 4, 7. DOI: 10.3390/pharma4020007. CC BY 4.0.

Passive Surveillance: AE Type Breakdown (Multi-System)

Side-by-side view of U.S. VAERS, Health Canada Canada Vigilance, Japan JADER (PMDA), EU EudraVigilance, and live-scraped international systems via SurVigilance (VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, Medsafe). SurVigilance panels show MedDRA PT mention totals (not individual-case counts). Category assignment uses keyword matching — approximate, not official SOC coding. VAERS ZIP CAPTCHA downloads use this site’s vaers_pipeline.py; FAERS is bulk quarterly ZIP via SurVigilance (not product search).

VAERS (United States)

No VAERS category summary is mapped for this vaccine page.

Canada Vigilance (Canada)

JADER (PMDA, Japan)

EudraVigilance (EU)

No matching vaccine cases in the current EudraVigilance DAP export.

SurVigilance: VigiAccess · Lareb · DAEN · DMA · Medsafe

VigiAccess (WHO)

Lareb (Netherlands)

DAEN (Australia)

No DAEN (Australia) data yet — run python scrape_survigilance_one.py daen <vaccine-id> or python survigilance_pipeline.py --system daen (SurVigilance + direct scrapers: GitHub).

DMA (Denmark)

Denmark DMA interactive ADR search is currently offline (Danish Medicines Agency IT transition; public overviews frozen at 12 Mar 2024). Live product PT tables cannot be retrieved until DKMA restores the search. See DKMA notice. Denmark continues to report into EU EudraVigilance (panel above).

Medsafe (New Zealand)

Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 11,067 reaction mentions in 3,417 unique reports (64.0% serious (2,186 of 3,417 reports)). Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Injection-site / Local reaction (17%), Neurological (10%). JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 1,313 reaction mentions in 666 unique reports (8.1% serious (54 of 666 reports)). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (35%), Neurological (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%). VigiAccess (WHO): 1,395 reaction-term mentions · search: varicella. Largest share: Gastrointestinal (26%), Dermatological (non-injection-site) (18%), Other / Unclassified (12%). Lareb (Netherlands): 80 reaction-term mentions · search: Varicella vaccine. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Other / Unclassified (16%), Injection-site / Local reaction (15%). Medsafe (New Zealand): 569 reaction-term mentions · search: varicella. Largest share: Injection-site / Local reaction (23%), General / Systemic (non-local) (21%), Other / Unclassified (17%). Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top Canada Vigilance: General / Systemic (non-local); top JADER: Other / Unclassified. SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, DAEN, DMA, and Medsafe counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0; pip install SurVigilance). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.

Compare AE patterns across all vaccines →

Pharmacovigilance Lot Signal Detection — Hypothesis-Generating Only

Multi-system context below. VAERS (U.S.) supports lot-level volume z-scores and seriousness flags by product and lot (2006–2024). Each lot links to a summary with report count, seriousness %, adverse-event pie chart, U.S. state map, and timeline. A signal flag means a statistical threshold was exceeded — not that a lot is unsafe. Full dashboard →

VAERS flags: VOL high report volume (z ≥ 3) · BURST clustered in <90 days · SER serious reports >50%. Lot numbers are voluntary/incomplete in VAERS. Location data is U.S. state only (no postal codes in the public extract).

VAERS (United States) — all lots by product

57,254 reports with usable lot across 4,317 lots · 511 flagged

Loading lot tables…

Other Pharmacovigilance Systems

Lot-level analysis is only possible where reporters supply batch/lot numbers in the public extract. Canada Vigilance, JADER (PMDA, Japan), and most other national systems publish product-level spontaneous reports without lot fields.

Canada Vigilance (Health Canada)

3,417 unique reports · 11,067 reaction mentions · 64.0% serious (2,186 of 3,417 reports). Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Injection-site / Local reaction (17%), Neurological (10%).

Canada Vigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The public CV Online data extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible for this system — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. No Canadian dose denominators are available. Extract 2026-03-31.

Search Canada Vigilance →

JADER (PMDA, Japan)

666 unique reports · 1,313 reaction mentions · 8.1% serious (54 of 666 reports). Top categories: Other / Unclassified (35%), Neurological (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%).

JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database) spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations; PMDA has not assessed causality per case. The public CSV extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. Reaction terms in source data use MedDRA/J Preferred Terms. JADER CSV extract pmdacasereport202606 (2026-06). JADER reference (PDF)

Search JADER / PMDA adverse reactions →

No EudraVigilance (EU) summary is mapped for this page.

VigiAccess (WHO)

1,395 MedDRA PT mentions · search: varicella. Top categories: Gastrointestinal (26%), Dermatological (non-injection-site) (18%), Other / Unclassified (12%).

Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.

Search VigiAccess (WHO) →

Lareb (Netherlands)

80 MedDRA PT mentions · search: Varicella vaccine. Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Other / Unclassified (16%), Injection-site / Local reaction (15%).

Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.

Search Lareb (Netherlands) →

SystemRegionLot data
VAERSUnited StatesLot data
Canada VigilanceCanadaNo public lot field
JADER (PMDA, Japan)JapanNo public lot field
Lareb (Netherlands)NetherlandsNo public lot field
EudraVigilanceEuropean UnionNo public lot field
VigiAccess (WHO)GlobalNo public lot field
Yellow Card (UK)United KingdomNo public lot field
DAEN (Australia)AustraliaNo public lot field

All global data sources → · Data schemas →

Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)

Curated findings for Varicella (Varivax) / context with MMRV from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.

ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate

The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator. Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group. These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data. Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.

○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance

CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)

Outcome: Febrile seizures (especially MMRV first dose) and other pre-specified outcomes

Tier 2 ● Signal confirmed (true association)

When varicella is combined as MMRV for the first toddler dose, VSD confirmed higher febrile-seizure risk versus separate injections. Standalone varicella vaccine does not drive that specific combination finding; see MMR page for MMRV detail.

Population

Toddlers receiving varicella-containing vaccines

Risk interval

5–12 days for febrile seizure analyses with measles-containing vaccines

Comparison

Separate MMR + varicella

Evaluation period

Post-licensure combination era

Method

RCA and observational studies (including MMRV combination analyses)

Related passive AE category on this page: Neurological (see multi-system charts above — not additive with active rates).

Sources: Klein NP et al. Pediatrics 2010 — MMRV febrile seizures

Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10

Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record. Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety); Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard); Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications. Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.

4. Documented Adverse Events

Rank-aggregated VAERS signal detection (rankv)

The table below lists vaccine–event pairs that were detected as disproportionality signals by all four base methods used in rankv (GPS, PRR, ROR, BCPNN) on multi-decade VAERS data, then ordered by rank aggregation (Borda average rank; related to the Spearman/GA top-list approach in the rankv paper).

Agg. rank VAERS product Preferred term (event) N Method ranks (GPS / PRR / ROR / BCPNN)
261 VARICELLA (NO BRAND NAME) Varicella post vaccine
clinical-coded PT
93 GPS rank 247 (EBGM=6.75); PRR rank 248 (PRR=11.2307); ROR rank 248 (ROR=11.3313); BCPNN rank 224 (IC_LB=2.9979)
282 VARICELLA (VARIVAX) Abortion
clinical-coded PT
104 GPS rank 268 (EBGM=6.36); PRR rank 257 (PRR=11.0222); ROR rank 258 (ROR=11.0279); BCPNN rank 284 (IC_LB=2.426)

Showing up to 15 pairs for this page (clinical-coded terms listed first). Full processed tables: rankv_signals.json.

  • Methods combined: BCPNN (IC), GPS/EBGM, PRR, ROR — then rank aggregation.
  • Data: ~30 years of public VAERS (rankv processed tables).
  • Origin: precisionFDA “Gaining New Insights by Detecting Adverse Event Anomalies” challenge solution.
  • Caveat: Disproportionality signals are statistical associations in spontaneous reports. They do not establish causality, incidence, or product defect. Many top pairs reflect administration/product-use coding rather than clinical injury.

Source: nanx.me/rankv · Code: github.com/nanxstats/rankv (MIT) · Built: 2026-07-30.

▶ Strong Evidence

▶ No Causal Association

5. Disease Prevention Benefits

MetricPre-Vaccine Era (~1990–1994)Post-Vaccine Era (2-dose, ~2010+)
Varicella cases (annual)~4 million>97% reduction; varicella is no longer endemic in the U.S.
Hospitalizations (annual)~10,500–13,500>90% reduction; almost exclusively unvaccinated or immunocompromised
Deaths (annual)~100–150<10/year
Herpes zoster in children~74 per 100,000~18–26 per 100,000 (vaccine-strain); overall pediatric zoster has declined

Source: CDC Pink Book; MMWR. The introduction of a second dose in 2006 effectively addressed breakthrough varicella observed with the 1-dose schedule. Herd immunity has been observed.

Disease Burden Over Time

Reported U.S. disease burden by year. The dashed vertical line marks vaccine introduction. Hover or tap data points for values; use arrow keys when a chart has focus.

ⓘ About these charts: These are accessible SVG line charts with keyboard navigation, hover tooltips, and an underlying data table (expand below). The dashed vertical line marks the year of vaccine introduction. Reported cases undercount true incidence; case definitions, reporting practices, and diagnostic methods have changed over time. See Section 5 for additional context and pre-vs-post era comparisons.

7. Evidence Summary

Varicella vaccine has >30 years of post-licensure data. The safety profile is well-characterized. The primary safety concern is the MMRV-associated febrile seizure risk, which is product-specific and mitigated by ACIP's preference for separate MMR + varicella administration for dose 1. Breakthrough varicella with the 1-dose schedule was addressed by the 2006 2-dose recommendation. Long-term data indicate that vaccine-strain zoster is less common than zoster after wild-type infection.

8. International Surveillance & Global Data

Quick links to public pharmacovigilance databases and trial registries relevant to Varicella Vaccine. Reporting counts do not establish causality.

9. Curated Adverse Event Literature

Curated peer-reviewed literature linking specific adverse events to Varicella (Chickenpox) Vaccine. Each entry is a case report, case series, or related safety publication identified via PubMed. Expand Search PubMed for additional literature below to run custom queries.

10. Key References

  1. IOM. Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality. National Academies Press; 2012.
  2. Klein NP, et al. Measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combination vaccine and the risk of febrile seizures. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):e1–e8.
  3. CDC. Pink Book — Varicella chapter. cdc.gov/pinkbook
  4. CDC. VSD. cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/vsd.html
  5. CDC/FDA. VAERS. vaers.hhs.gov

Part of the Open Source Medicine Foundation Network

Open Source Medicine Foundation

Home of the OSMF network — open-source pharmacovigilance tools and evidence-based medicine resources.

Research Tracker

Track peer-reviewed literature on vaccine safety, pharmacovigilance, and post-market surveillance.

SpikeProtein.site

Comprehensive resource on spike protein biology, biodistribution, and clinical implications.

VitalScan4PACVS

Decentralized trial for PACVS (post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome).

PACVS Research Summit

Annual summit convening researchers and clinicians studying post-acute COVID-19 vaccination syndrome.