VAERS (U.S., 2006–2024): 4,923,243 symptom mentions (371.29/100k doses). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (22%), General / Systemic (non-local) (18%), Neurological (12%).
Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 60,469 reaction mentions in 12,929 unique reports (85.6% serious (11,070 of 12,929 reports)). Largest share: Cardiac / Cardiovascular (14%), Neurological (13%), General / Systemic (non-local) (12%).
JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 125,347 reaction mentions in 31,435 unique reports (10.9% serious (3,431 of 31,435 reports)). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (33%), Neurological (13%), General / Systemic (non-local) (12%).
VigiAccess (WHO VigiBase): 18,107,554 reaction-term mentions · search: COVID-19. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (23%), Neurological (17%), Other / Unclassified (13%).
Lareb (Netherlands): 119,155 reaction-term mentions · search: COVID-19 vaccine. Largest share: Other / Unclassified (33%), Musculoskeletal (13%), Neurological (13%).
DAEN (Australia): 470,194 reaction-term mentions · search: COVID-19 vaccine. Largest share: Neurological (21%), General / Systemic (non-local) (15%), Cardiac / Cardiovascular (11%).
Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top VAERS: Other / Unclassified; top Canada Vigilance: Cardiac / Cardiovascular; top JADER: Other / Unclassified.
SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, and DAEN counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via
SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.
Pharmacovigilance Lot Signal Detection — Hypothesis-Generating Only
Multi-system context below. VAERS (U.S.) supports lot-level volume z-scores and seriousness flags by product and lot (2006–2024). Each lot links to a summary with report count, seriousness %, adverse-event pie chart, U.S. state map, and timeline. A signal flag means a statistical threshold was exceeded — not that a lot is unsafe. Full dashboard →
VAERS flags:
VOL high report volume (z ≥ 3) ·
BURST clustered in <90 days ·
SER serious reports >50%.
Lot numbers are voluntary/incomplete in VAERS. Location data is U.S. state only (no postal codes in the public extract).
VAERS (United States) — all lots by product
714,061 reports with usable lot across 6,145 lots · 629 flagged
Other Pharmacovigilance Systems
Lot-level analysis is only possible where reporters supply batch/lot numbers in the public extract. Canada Vigilance, JADER (PMDA, Japan), and most other national systems publish product-level spontaneous reports without lot fields.
Canada Vigilance (Health Canada)
12,929 unique reports · 60,469 reaction mentions · 85.6% serious (11,070 of 12,929 reports). Top categories: Cardiac / Cardiovascular (14%), Neurological (13%), General / Systemic (non-local) (12%).
Canada Vigilance spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations. The public CV Online data extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible for this system — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. No Canadian dose denominators are available. Extract 2026-03-31.
Search Canada Vigilance →
JADER (PMDA, Japan)
31,435 unique reports · 125,347 reaction mentions · 10.9% serious (3,431 of 31,435 reports). Top categories: Other / Unclassified (33%), Neurological (13%), General / Systemic (non-local) (12%).
JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database) spontaneous reports are unverified temporal associations; PMDA has not assessed causality per case. The public CSV extract does not include lot or batch numbers, so lot-level signal detection is not possible — only product-level reaction patterns are shown here. Reaction terms in source data use MedDRA/J Preferred Terms. JADER CSV extract pmdacasereport202606 (2026-06). JADER reference (PDF)
Search JADER / PMDA adverse reactions →
No EudraVigilance (EU) summary is mapped for this page.
VigiAccess (WHO)
18,107,554 MedDRA PT mentions · search: COVID-19. Top categories: General / Systemic (non-local) (23%), Neurological (17%), Other / Unclassified (13%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search VigiAccess (WHO) →
Lareb (Netherlands)
119,155 MedDRA PT mentions · search: COVID-19 vaccine. Top categories: Other / Unclassified (33%), Musculoskeletal (13%), Neurological (13%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search Lareb (Netherlands) →
DAEN (Australia)
470,194 MedDRA PT mentions · search: COVID-19 vaccine. Top categories: Neurological (21%), General / Systemic (non-local) (15%), Cardiac / Cardiovascular (11%).
Live-scraped public portal data via SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Counts are reaction-term mentions, not deduplicated individual cases. No lot/batch field.
Search DAEN (Australia) →
All global data sources → · Data schemas →
Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)
Curated findings for COVID-19 vaccines from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.
ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate
The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator.
Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs
more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group.
These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data.
Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.
○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance
Dense Tier 1 and Tier 2 coverage since 2020–2021. VSD RCA is internal; findings are public via ACIP slides, MMWR, and peer-reviewed papers.
CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
Outcome: Myocarditis / pericarditis
Tier 2
● Signal confirmed (true association)
VSD detected elevated myocarditis rates after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (especially dose 2 in young males). Signal investigated extensively and confirmed as a true association; informed clinical guidance and risk communication. Incidence remains rare relative to doses administered.
PopulationVSD sites; elevated risk primarily ages 12–39, higher after dose 2 mRNA in adolescent/young adult males
Risk interval0–7 days post-vaccination (primary analytic window used in RCA presentations)
ComparisonConcurrent vaccinated comparators / later post-vaccination control windows (study-dependent)
Evaluation period2021–ongoing (peak detection 2021–2022)
MethodRapid Cycle Analysis — vaccinated concurrent / risk-interval designs with chart validation
Related passive AE category on this page: Cardiac / Cardiovascular (see multi-system charts above — not additive with active rates).
Sources: Klein NP et al. Rapid cycle analysis — myocarditis and anaphylaxis (CDC stack) · CDC VSD overview — monitoring methods
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
Outcome: Ischemic stroke (selected bivalent booster subgroups)
Tier 2
◑ Investigated — not confirmed
An initial statistical signal for ischemic stroke in a bivalent booster subgroup was investigated further across VSD and complementary data sources. Follow-up analyses did not confirm a consistent elevated risk warranting a causal attribution; monitoring continued as standard practice.
PopulationVSD sites; adults 65+ receiving certain bivalent boosters (signal first noted in a specific age/formulation subgroup)
Risk interval1–21 days post-vaccination (as presented in ACIP materials for the initial signal)
ComparisonLater post-vaccination window (e.g., 22–42 or 43–63 days; analysis-dependent)
Evaluation period2022–2023
MethodRapid Cycle Analysis / self-controlled and multi-source follow-up
Related passive AE category on this page: Cardiac / Cardiovascular (see multi-system charts above — not additive with active rates).
Sources: CDC — COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance overview · CDC VSD
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
AusVaxSafety (Australia)
Outcome: Short-term solicited adverse events (medical attendance / selected serious outcomes)
Tier 1
○ No signal detected
AusVaxSafety active survey surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines in Australia has repeatedly reported short-term safety profiles consistent with known reactogenicity; large respondent samples with low rates of medical care-seeking after vaccination in published analyses. Check brand-specific public pages for the latest formulation.
PopulationAustralian vaccinees participating in AusVaxSafety after COVID-19 vaccination (multi-brand program)
Risk intervalDays 0–3 and follow-up survey windows per protocol
ComparisonInternal signal thresholds / historical expected rates (system methods)
Evaluation period2021–ongoing (public safety-data pages updated periodically)
Sample sizePublished early-program analyses included multi-million survey responses (see citations)
MethodActive SMS/email post-vaccination surveys; sentinel clinics; published signal-detection methods
Sources: AusVaxSafety — COVID-19 vaccine safety data · Deng L et al. Med J Aust 2022 — AusVaxSafety short-term safety
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record.
Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety);
Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard);
Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications.
Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.