Shingrix has one of the highest VAERS report volumes among non-COVID adult vaccines — consistent with intense reactogenicity in trials and broad age ≥50 rollout. What databases report below is not the same as trial reactogenicity rates.
Mapping note: Canada Vigilance and JADER on this page use the
varicella pipeline bucket, which includes Shingrix/HERPES ZOSTER products alongside chickenpox vaccines — counts are not Shingrix-only.
Canada Vigilance (CV Online extract): 11,067 reaction mentions in 3,417 unique reports (64.0% serious (2,186 of 3,417 reports)). Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (17%), Injection-site / Local reaction (17%), Neurological (10%).
JADER (PMDA public CSV extract): 1,313 reaction mentions in 666 unique reports (8.1% serious (54 of 666 reports)). Largest share: Other / Unclassified (35%), Neurological (18%), General / Systemic (non-local) (13%).
VigiAccess (WHO VigiBase): 1,395 reaction-term mentions · search: varicella. Largest share: Gastrointestinal (26%), Dermatological (non-injection-site) (18%), Other / Unclassified (12%).
Lareb (Netherlands): 80 reaction-term mentions · search: Varicella vaccine. Largest share: General / Systemic (non-local) (22%), Other / Unclassified (16%), Injection-site / Local reaction (15%).
Cross-database note: All systems are passive and unverified; reporting rates are not directly comparable across countries (different populations, reporting incentives, and lack of dose denominators for Canada/Japan/EU). top Canada Vigilance: General / Systemic (non-local); top JADER: Other / Unclassified.
SurVigilance note: VigiAccess, Lareb, and DAEN counts are live-scraped MedDRA PT mention totals (not deduplicated individual cases). Data via
SurVigilance (GPL-3.0). Category assignment uses keyword matching on reported reaction terms — approximate and exploratory. Neither database establishes causality.
Active Pharmacovigilance (Defined-Population Surveillance)
Curated findings for Recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix) from active systems (not VAERS). Page inventory last reviewed: 2026-07-10.
ⓘ Active vs. passive — why this pane is separate
The VAERS / multi-system charts above are passive surveillance: spontaneous, unverified reports without a fixed denominator.
Active surveillance starts from a defined, enumerated population (EHR/claims or structured post-vaccination surveys), applies pre-specified statistical tests, and asks whether an outcome occurs
more often than expected in a risk window versus a comparison window or group.
These are not two flavors of the same evidence — active findings are the harder tier that can confirm, refute, or leave under investigation a signal first hinted in passive data.
Do not add VAERS report counts to active incidence rates.
○ No signal detected ◐ Signal under investigation ◑ Investigated — not confirmed ● Signal confirmed (true association) – Not currently under active surveillance
CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
Outcome: Pre-specified serious outcomes; reactogenicity is expected and common
Tier 2
○ No signal detected
Shingrix is known for high rates of transient local and systemic reactogenicity (expected pharmacologic effect of the AS01B-adjuvanted product). Active surveillance has not established unexpected rare serious risk signals that reverse the risk–benefit assessment used in ACIP recommendations; monitoring continues.
PopulationAdults ≥50 (and other recommended groups) at VSD sites
Risk intervalStudy-specific
ComparisonControl intervals
Evaluation period2017–ongoing post-licensure
MethodPost-licensure observational studies and RCA as scheduled
Sources: CDC VSD · CDC Shingrix safety
Record last reviewed: 2026-07-10
Update cadence: Tier 1: check AusVaxSafety monthly when public pages update. Tier 2/3: quarterly review around ACIP meetings and PubMed/MMWR; set lastReviewed per record.
Source tiers: Tier 1 = public near-real-time dashboards (e.g. AusVaxSafety);
Tier 2 = VSD / Sentinel / PRAC-type findings released via ACIP slides, MMWR, or papers (no public VSD raw dashboard);
Tier 3 = regulator label/safety communications.
Detecting a signal and later classifying it as not confirmed is normal system behavior — not an anomaly to hide or amplify.