← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Acetaminophen and Chlorpheniramine side effects: what 1,013 FDA adverse event reports show

Acetaminophen And Chlorpheniramine Maleate · 13 reaction terms · 424 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Acetaminophen (Acetaminophen)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

1,013 reports · 18% serious · 10 with death outcome · 67% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

temporarily relieves minor aches and pains due to: headache muscular aches backache minor pain of arthritis the common cold toothache premenstrual and menstrual cramps temporarily reduces fever

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 10 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 6Not in label — unassessed 4
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 3 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug effect decreased16161.2
53.1–70.5ROR 72.5 · χ² 9,464 / p <1e-300
60.6 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication4115.2
11.3–20.6ROR 15.8 · χ² 532 / p 5e-118
15.0 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact98% consumerno trial data cached
Somnolence (drowsiness)13113.5
11.5–15.8ROR 15.4 · χ² 1,517 / p <1e-300
13.4 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Choking1212.8
7.3–22.5ROR 12.9 · χ² 119 / p 5e-28
11.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.2no trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected2210.1
6.7–15.3ROR 10.3 · χ² 172 / p 1e-39
9.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Respiratory tract congestion67.8
3.5–17.3ROR 7.9 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8
5.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.9no trial data cached
Psychomotor hyperactivity67.5
3.4–16.6ROR 7.5 · χ² 27 / p 8e-8
5.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Product use complaint56.7
2.8–16.0ROR 6.7 · χ² 19 / p 7e-6
4.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=5no trial data cached
Expired product administered85.0
2.5–10.0ROR 5.0 · χ² 22 / p 2e-6
4.0 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4no trial data cached
Drug abuse184.5
2.8–7.0ROR 4.5 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
4.0 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.0no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug effect decreased16161.2
53.1–70.5ROR 72.5 · χ² 9,464 / p <1e-300
60.6 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Somnolence (drowsiness)13113.5
11.5–15.8ROR 15.4 · χ² 1,517 / p <1e-300
13.4 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication4115.2
11.3–20.6ROR 15.8 · χ² 532 / p 5e-118
15.0 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact98% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected2210.1
6.7–15.3ROR 10.3 · χ² 172 / p 1e-39
9.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug abuse184.5
2.8–7.0ROR 4.5 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
4.0 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Choking1212.8
7.3–22.5ROR 12.9 · χ² 119 / p 5e-28
11.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.2no trial data cached
Expired product administered85.0
2.5–10.0ROR 5.0 · χ² 22 / p 2e-6
4.0 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4no trial data cached
Intentional overdose72.3
1.1–4.8ROR 2.3 · χ² 4 / p 0.025
2.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Psychomotor hyperactivity67.5
3.4–16.6ROR 7.5 · χ² 27 / p 8e-8
5.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Respiratory tract congestion67.8
3.5–17.3ROR 7.9 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8
5.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.9no trial data cached
Product use complaint56.7
2.8–16.0ROR 6.7 · χ² 19 / p 7e-6
4.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=5no trial data cached
Ocular discomfort47.6
2.9–20.3ROR 7.7 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
4.6 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Product packaging issue36.7
2.2–20.7ROR 6.7 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
3.8 EB05 1.5 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) ↔ Liver injury / hepatotoxicity.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Acetaminophen and Chlorpheniramine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Acetaminophen and Chlorpheniramine are somnolence, choking, psychomotor hyperactivity, respiratory tract congestion, ocular discomfort. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Acetaminophen and Chlorpheniramine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Acetaminophen and Chlorpheniramine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Acetaminophen and Chlorpheniramine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.