← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Acetaminophen side effects: what 7,143 FDA adverse event reports show

Acetaminophen, Aspirin (Nsaid), And Caffeine · 363 reaction terms · 11,317 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

7,143 reports · 29% serious · 106 with death outcome · 79% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

temporarily relieves minor aches and pains due to: headache muscular aches backache minor pain of arthritis the common cold toothache premenstrual and menstrual cramps temporarily reduces fever

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 12Not in label — unassessed 26
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 323 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug effective for unapproved indication13313.4
11.3–15.9ROR 13.7 · χ² 1,511 / p <1e-300
13.3 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Ulcer529.6
7.3–12.6ROR 9.7 · χ² 391 / p 2e-87
9.2 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Migraine2648.2
7.3–9.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 1,661 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.4 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric disorder776.5
5.2–8.1ROR 6.6 · χ² 353 / p 5e-79
6.3 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric ulcer426.5
4.8–8.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 189 / p 2e-43
6.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.5 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric haemorrhage256.3
4.3–9.4ROR 6.4 · χ² 107 / p 2e-25
5.7 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.0 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling jittery416.3
4.7–8.6ROR 6.3 · χ² 178 / p 7e-41
5.9 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected895.8
4.7–7.1ROR 5.9 · χ² 350 / p 2e-78
5.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.6 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
End stage renal disease314.9
3.5–7.0ROR 5.0 · χ² 94 / p 2e-22
4.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Contraindicated product administered474.6
3.4–6.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 128 / p 6e-30
4.4 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,0094.5
4.3–4.7ROR 5.8 · χ² 5,790 / p <1e-300
4.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect incomplete554.4
3.4–5.7ROR 4.4 · χ² 140 / p 1e-32
4.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.1 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease1114.3
3.5–5.1ROR 4.3 · χ² 274 / p 9e-62
4.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5no trial data cached
Drug administration error454.2
3.2–5.7ROR 4.3 · χ² 109 / p 1e-25
4.1 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.3 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Vitamin d deficiency144.2
2.5–7.1ROR 4.2 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
3.8 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication804.2
3.4–5.2ROR 4.3 · χ² 193 / p 3e-44
4.1 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Product physical issue284.1
2.9–6.0ROR 4.1 · χ² 63 / p 9e-16
3.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=7 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected183.8
2.4–6.0ROR 3.8 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
3.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Poor quality sleep273.7
2.5–5.4ROR 3.7 · χ² 51 / p 5e-13
3.5 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Tooth fracture133.5
2.0–6.0ROR 3.5 · χ² 20 / p 3e-6
3.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Product quality issue1483.2
2.7–3.8ROR 3.3 · χ² 226 / p 2e-51
3.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Dental caries123.2
1.8–5.6ROR 3.2 · χ² 16 / p 3e-5
2.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Initial insomnia113.2
1.8–5.7ROR 3.2 · χ² 14 / p 8e-5
2.9 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication2623.2
2.8–3.5ROR 3.2 · χ² 386 / p 2e-86
3.1 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Tubulointerstitial nephritis203.1
2.0–4.9ROR 3.1 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
3.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.2no trial data cached
Impaired driving ability123.1
1.8–5.5ROR 3.1 · χ² 15 / p 5e-5
2.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Incorrect drug administration duration303.1
2.2–4.4ROR 3.1 · χ² 40 / p 1e-10
3.0 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.8 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort1703.0
2.6–3.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 224 / p 5e-51
3.0 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Sinus disorder203.0
1.9–4.6ROR 3.0 · χ² 24 / p 5e-7
2.8 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Bladder disorder103.0
1.6–5.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 11 / p 5e-4
2.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Seasonal allergy142.9
1.7–4.9ROR 2.9 · χ² 16 / p 4e-5
2.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Micturition urgency112.8
1.6–5.1ROR 2.9 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.8no trial data cached
Dysmenorrhoea122.7
1.5–4.7ROR 2.7 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.5 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal pain102.7
1.4–5.0ROR 2.7 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Abdominal pain upper1832.6
2.3–3.0ROR 2.7 · χ² 183 / p 6e-42
2.6 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Headache5432.5
2.3–2.8ROR 2.7 · χ² 524 / p 3e-116
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.8 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia oral132.5
1.5–4.4ROR 2.5 · χ² 11 / p 6e-4
2.4 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Paraesthesia oral122.5
1.4–4.3ROR 2.5 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.3 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Pain in jaw232.4
1.6–3.6ROR 2.4 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
2.3 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.5Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Muscle tightness132.4
1.4–4.1ROR 2.4 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.2 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,0094.5
4.3–4.7ROR 5.8 · χ² 5,790 / p <1e-300
4.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Headache5432.5
2.3–2.8ROR 2.7 · χ² 524 / p 3e-116
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.8 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Nausea4001.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Migraine2648.2
7.3–9.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 1,661 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.4 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication2623.2
2.8–3.5ROR 3.2 · χ² 386 / p 2e-86
3.1 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)2042.2
2.0–2.6ROR 2.3 · χ² 141 / p 7e-33
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal pain upper1832.6
2.3–3.0ROR 2.7 · χ² 183 / p 6e-42
2.6 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort1703.0
2.6–3.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 224 / p 5e-51
3.0 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Anxiety1561.6
1.4–1.9ROR 1.6 · χ² 35 / p 1e-9
1.6 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Product quality issue1483.2
2.7–3.8ROR 3.3 · χ² 226 / p 2e-51
3.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling abnormal1391.7
1.4–2.0ROR 1.7 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effective for unapproved indication13313.4
11.3–15.9ROR 13.7 · χ² 1,511 / p <1e-300
13.3 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug dependence1222.2
1.8–2.6ROR 2.2 · χ² 79 / p 3e-19
2.2 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Back pain1161.5
1.2–1.8ROR 1.5 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
1.5 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.2Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease1114.3
3.5–5.1ROR 4.3 · χ² 274 / p 9e-62
4.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) ↔ Liver injury / hepatotoxicity.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Acetaminophen?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Acetaminophen are headache, nausea, migraine, insomnia, abdominal pain upper, abdominal discomfort. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Acetaminophen have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Acetaminophen has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Acetaminophen causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.