← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Acetaminophen side effects: what 1,515 FDA adverse event reports show

Acetaminophen, Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide, Doxylamine Succinate · 44 reaction terms · 1,007 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

1,515 reports · 47% serious · 52 with death outcome · 65% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

temporarily relieves minor aches and pains due to: headache muscular aches backache minor pain of arthritis the common cold toothache premenstrual and menstrual cramps temporarily reduces fever

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 20 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 3Not in label — unassessed 17
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 24 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Disease recurrence13539.2
33.4–46.1ROR 42.9 · χ² 4,987 / p <1e-300
38.9 EB05 33.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.3 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Choking3222.8
16.2–32.1ROR 23.3 · χ² 645 / p 1e-142
22.5 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 32.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Sinus tachycardia1918.6
11.9–29.0ROR 18.8 · χ² 298 / p 4e-67
18.1 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.0no trial data cached
Product use complaint1614.3
8.8–23.3ROR 14.4 · χ² 185 / p 3e-42
13.4 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=15no trial data cached
Acute hepatic failure1414.2
8.5–24.0ROR 14.4 · χ² 159 / p 8e-37
13.2 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.3no trial data cached
Covid-1917413.6
11.8–15.6ROR 15.2 · χ² 2,035 / p <1e-300
13.5 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Nasopharyngitis (common cold)13510.1
8.6–11.9ROR 11.0 · χ² 1,108 / p 3e-243
10.0 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Nasal congestion (stuffy nose)389.0
6.6–12.3ROR 9.2 · χ² 262 / p 3e-59
8.4 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Lactic acidosis208.6
5.6–13.3ROR 8.7 · χ² 127 / p 8e-30
7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.5 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Rhinorrhoea (runny nose)388.2
6.0–11.2ROR 8.3 · χ² 232 / p 1e-52
7.6 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.8 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Sneezing138.0
4.7–13.8ROR 8.1 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18
6.6 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Intentional overdose347.4
5.3–10.3ROR 7.5 · χ² 182 / p 1e-41
6.8 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Sinus disorder107.0
3.8–12.9ROR 7.0 · χ² 45 / p 8e-12
5.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Taste disorder106.9
3.7–12.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
5.4 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Dysgeusia (altered taste)376.9
5.0–9.4ROR 7.0 · χ² 180 / p 3e-41
6.4 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Oropharyngeal pain (sore throat)436.4
4.8–8.6ROR 6.6 · χ² 192 / p 5e-44
6.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Throat irritation195.9
3.8–9.2ROR 5.9 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17
5.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6no trial data cached
Suicide attempt245.5
3.7–8.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
5.0 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Panic attack134.9
2.9–8.5ROR 5.0 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
4.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents504.1
3.1–5.4ROR 4.2 · χ² 116 / p 3e-27
4.0 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Covid-1917413.6
11.8–15.6ROR 15.2 · χ² 2,035 / p <1e-300
13.5 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Nasopharyngitis (common cold)13510.1
8.6–11.9ROR 11.0 · χ² 1,108 / p 3e-243
10.0 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Disease recurrence13539.2
33.4–46.1ROR 42.9 · χ² 4,987 / p <1e-300
38.9 EB05 33.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.3 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents504.1
3.1–5.4ROR 4.2 · χ² 116 / p 3e-27
4.0 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Oropharyngeal pain (sore throat)436.4
4.8–8.6ROR 6.6 · χ² 192 / p 5e-44
6.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Rhinorrhoea (runny nose)388.2
6.0–11.2ROR 8.3 · χ² 232 / p 1e-52
7.6 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.8 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Nasal congestion (stuffy nose)389.0
6.6–12.3ROR 9.2 · χ² 262 / p 3e-59
8.4 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Dysgeusia (altered taste)376.9
5.0–9.4ROR 7.0 · χ² 180 / p 3e-41
6.4 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional overdose347.4
5.3–10.3ROR 7.5 · χ² 182 / p 1e-41
6.8 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Choking3222.8
16.2–32.1ROR 23.3 · χ² 645 / p 1e-142
22.5 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 32.5 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Suicide attempt245.5
3.7–8.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
5.0 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Lactic acidosis208.6
5.6–13.3ROR 8.7 · χ² 127 / p 8e-30
7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.5 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Throat irritation195.9
3.8–9.2ROR 5.9 · χ² 72 / p 1e-17
5.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6no trial data cached
Sinus tachycardia1918.6
11.9–29.0ROR 18.8 · χ² 298 / p 4e-67
18.1 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.0no trial data cached
Product use complaint1614.3
8.8–23.3ROR 14.4 · χ² 185 / p 3e-42
13.4 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=15no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Acetaminophen (paracetamol) ↔ Liver injury / hepatotoxicity.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Acetaminophen?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Acetaminophen are covid-19, nasopharyngitis, toxicity to various agents, oropharyngeal pain, rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Acetaminophen have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Acetaminophen has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Acetaminophen causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.