Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen
Aceticum Acidum side effects: what 3,902 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
No validated FDA label found
closest label found was a multi-ingredient product (Aceticum Acidum, Adrenalinum, American Ginseng, Arnica Montana, Balsamum Peruvianum, Bos Taurus Pituitarum Posterium, Ch) and was not used
Who reports
3,902 reports · 59% serious · 157 with death outcome · 72% female
openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied
Used for
—
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation.
Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)?
That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
Reporting / coding artifact 3Lab value / disease marker 1No label text to screen 36
What the badges mean
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
- No label text to screen No validated FDA label was retrievable for this product, so the screen could not run. Disproportionality only.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 391 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
Show:
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequent bowel movements | 47 | 9.4 7.1–12.5ROR 9.5 · χ² 344 / p 5e-77 | 8.9 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 12.0 · 72% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Brain fog | 22 | 8.1 5.3–12.3ROR 8.1 · χ² 130 / p 2e-30 | 7.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 12.5 · 82% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Therapy change | 13 | 7.2 4.2–12.5ROR 7.3 · χ² 64 / p 7e-16 | 6.0 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Impaired quality of life | 18 | 6.7 4.2–10.7ROR 6.7 · χ² 82 / p 7e-20 | 5.8 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 6.5 | no trial data cached |
| Poor venous access | 12 | 6.2 3.5–11.0ROR 6.3 · χ² 48 / p 3e-12 | 5.1 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious n=12 | no trial data cached |
| Drug effect less than expected | 16 | 6.1 3.7–9.9ROR 6.1 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15 | 5.3 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Quality of life decreased | 15 | 6.0 3.6–9.9ROR 6.0 · χ² 57 / p 2e-14 | 5.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.8 | no trial data cached |
| Gastroenteritis viral | 20 | 5.9 3.8–9.2ROR 6.0 · χ² 77 / p 8e-19 | 5.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 7.7 | no trial data cached |
| Nerve compression | 10 | 5.8 3.1–10.8ROR 5.8 · χ² 35 / p 1e-9 | 4.7 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 6.9 | no trial data cached |
| Blood iron decreased | 12 | 5.5 3.1–9.6ROR 5.5 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10 | 4.6 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 5.4 | no trial data cached |
| Local swelling | 18 | 5.5 3.4–8.7ROR 5.5 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15 | 4.8 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.3 | no trial data cached |
| Hiatus hernia | 13 | 5.4 3.1–9.3ROR 5.4 · χ² 42 / p 4e-11 | 4.6 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.5 | no trial data cached |
| Sexual dysfunction | 11 | 5.1 2.8–9.1ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9 | 4.2 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.4 | no trial data cached |
| Infusion site pain | 12 | 5.0 2.9–8.9ROR 5.1 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9 | 4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Skin laceration | 10 | 5.0 2.7–9.2ROR 5.0 · χ² 28 / p 7e-8 | 4.1 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.6 | no trial data cached |
| Gastrointestinal pain | 10 | 4.9 2.6–9.1ROR 4.9 · χ² 27 / p 9e-8 | 4.1 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.8 | no trial data cached |
| Small intestinal obstruction | 11 | 4.8 2.7–8.7ROR 4.8 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8 | 4.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.3 | no trial data cached |
| Sinus congestion | 12 | 4.8 2.7–8.4ROR 4.8 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9 | 4.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious n=6 | no trial data cached |
| Impaired work ability | 19 | 4.8 3.0–7.4ROR 4.8 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13 | 4.3 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.3 | no trial data cached |
| Hernia | 17 | 4.7 2.9–7.6ROR 4.8 · χ² 47 / p 5e-12 | 4.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.2 | no trial data cached |
| Restless legs syndrome | 16 | 4.7 2.9–7.7ROR 4.7 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11 | 4.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.6 | no trial data cached |
| Colitis ulcerative | 39 | 4.7 3.4–6.4ROR 4.7 · χ² 110 / p 5e-26 | 4.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.8 · ♀ 51% (drug 72%) | no trial data cached |
| Bone disorder | 16 | 4.7 2.9–7.6ROR 4.7 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11 | 4.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.9 | no trial data cached |
| Lacrimation increased | 26 | 4.7 3.2–6.9ROR 4.7 · χ² 71 / p 1e-17 | 4.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.6 · 82% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Neuralgia | 21 | 4.6 3.0–7.1ROR 4.7 · χ² 57 / p 3e-14 | 4.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 6.1 | no trial data cached |
| Neck pain | 48 | 4.6 3.5–6.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 132 / p 7e-31 | 4.4 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.8 · 74% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Mass | 12 | 4.6 2.6–8.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 30 / p 2e-8 | 4.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 2.7 | no trial data cached |
| Dysstasia | 25 | 4.6 3.1–6.8ROR 4.6 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16 | 4.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.5 · 86% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Burning sensation | 58 | 4.4 3.4–5.7ROR 4.5 · χ² 152 / p 4e-35 | 4.3 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.6 · 87% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Fibromyalgia | 20 | 4.4 2.9–6.8ROR 4.4 · χ² 50 / p 1e-12 | 4.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.5 | no trial data cached |
| Ear pain | 16 | 4.4 2.7–7.2ROR 4.4 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10 | 4.0 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.5 | no trial data cached |
| Therapy cessation | 42 | 4.4 3.3–6.0ROR 4.4 · χ² 108 / p 2e-25 | 4.2 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 7.6 · 82% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Generalised oedema | 10 | 4.4 2.3–8.1ROR 4.4 · χ² 23 / p 1e-6 | 3.7 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.7 | no trial data cached |
| Intestinal obstruction | 30 | 4.3 3.0–6.1ROR 4.3 · χ² 73 / p 7e-18 | 4.0 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.3 | no trial data cached |
| Balance disorder | 67 | 4.2 3.3–5.3ROR 4.2 · χ² 158 / p 2e-36 | 4.0 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.6 · 79% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (acid reflux) | 61 | 4.1 3.2–5.2ROR 4.1 · χ² 139 / p 2e-32 | 4.0 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.1 | no trial data cached |
| Scar | 13 | 4.1 2.4–7.0ROR 4.1 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7 | 3.6 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 5.2 | no trial data cached |
| Joint range of motion decreased | 10 | 4.0 2.2–7.5ROR 4.0 · χ² 20 / p 4e-6 | 3.5 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.5 | no trial data cached |
| Haematochezia (blood in stool) | 41 | 4.0 2.9–5.4ROR 4.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21 | 3.8 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.7 | no trial data cached |
| Hair texture abnormal | 10 | 4.0 2.1–7.4ROR 4.0 · χ² 19 / p 5e-6 | 3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | – | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 412 | 2.8 2.6–3.1ROR 3.1 · χ² 510 / p 3e-113 | 2.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.1 · 79% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 321 | 2.7 2.4–3.0ROR 2.8 · χ² 346 / p 1e-77 | 2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 2.9 · 74% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Headache | 277 | 2.4 2.1–2.7ROR 2.5 · χ² 226 / p 3e-51 | 2.4 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 2.8 · 84% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Dizziness | 253 | 2.7 2.4–3.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 282 / p 2e-63 | 2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.0 · 77% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 225 | 2.9 2.6–3.3ROR 3.0 · χ² 286 / p 1e-64 | 2.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.6 · 77% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Injection site pain (pain where injected) | 174 | 3.1 2.7–3.6ROR 3.2 · χ² 245 / p 1e-55 | 3.1 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.0 · 87% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Pain in extremity | 164 | 3.0 2.6–3.5ROR 3.1 · χ² 217 / p 2e-49 | 3.0 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.7 · 77% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Back pain | 153 | 3.5 3.0–4.1ROR 3.6 · χ² 278 / p 1e-62 | 3.5 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.8 | no trial data cached |
| Insomnia (trouble sleeping) | 138 | 2.8 2.4–3.3ROR 2.8 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36 | 2.8 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.3 · 84% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Anxiety | 135 | 2.5 2.2–3.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 126 / p 1e-29 | 2.5 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 2.7 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Abdominal pain | 128 | 3.0 2.5–3.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 165 / p 4e-38 | 2.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.1 | no trial data cached |
| Muscle spasms | 128 | 3.7 3.2–4.4ROR 3.8 · χ² 257 / p 5e-58 | 3.7 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 4.4 · 77% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Constipation | 121 | 3.0 2.5–3.6ROR 3.1 · χ² 161 / p 3e-37 | 3.0 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.3 · 78% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Gait disturbance | 116 | 3.2 2.7–3.9ROR 3.3 · χ² 179 / p 3e-41 | 3.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.0 · 80% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Feeling abnormal | 113 | 2.5 2.1–3.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 103 / p 1e-24 | 2.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen | serious PRR 3.3 · 80% consumer | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Aceticum Acidum?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Aceticum Acidum are fatigue, diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, arthralgia, injection site pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Aceticum Acidum have an FDA boxed warning?
No validated FDA label could be retrieved for this product name, so this page cannot say.
Do FAERS signals prove that Aceticum Acidum causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- No FDA label passed the name-validation check for this product string, so label-based screening was skipped
- Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 431 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.