← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Acyclovir side effects: what 1,249 FDA adverse event reports show

Acyclovir Sodium · 73 reaction terms · 1,737 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Herpes Simplex Virus Nucleoside Analog DNA Polymerase Inhibitor, Herpes Zoster Virus Nucleoside Analog DNA Polymerase Inhibitor, Herpesvirus Nucleoside Analog DNA Polymerase Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

1,249 reports · 83% serious · 189 with death outcome · 57% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Herpes Zoster Infections: Acyclovir capsules are indicated for the acute treatment of herpes zoster (shingles). Genital Herpes: Acyclovir capsules are indicated for the treatment of initial episodes and the management of recurrent episodes of genital herpes. Chickenpox: Acyclovir capsules are indicated for the treatment of chickenpox (varicella).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Acyclovir is a synthetic nucleoside analogue active against herpesviruses. Acyclovir capsules are formulation for oral administration. Acyclovir is a white or almost white, crystalline powder with the molecular formula C 8 H 11 N 5 O 3 and a molecular weight of 225.20.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 39 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 34 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Full blood count abnormal5283.3
63.8–108.8ROR 86.9 · χ² 4,129 / p <1e-300
80.6 EB05 63.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 74.7 · ♀ 78% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Carpal tunnel syndrome6578.2
61.7–99.1ROR 82.4 · χ² 4,857 / p <1e-300
76.2 EB05 61.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 66.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Blood test abnormal6375.8
59.5–96.5ROR 79.8 · χ² 4,557 / p <1e-300
73.8 EB05 59.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 79.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Sleep disorder due to a general medical condition7174.1
59.1–93.0ROR 78.6 · χ² 5,032 / p <1e-300
72.4 EB05 59.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 101.1 · ♀ 84% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Nephropathy3664.7
46.9–89.4ROR 66.6 · χ² 2,189 / p <1e-300
62.5 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 47.5 · ♀ 97% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Sleep apnoea syndrome6153.8
42.1–68.7ROR 56.5 · χ² 3,101 / p <1e-300
52.8 EB05 42.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 44.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Fibromyalgia6444.4
35.0–56.4ROR 46.8 · χ² 2,669 / p <1e-300
43.8 EB05 35.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Hypothyroidism6735.5
28.1–44.8ROR 37.4 · χ² 2,207 / p <1e-300
35.1 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.9 · ♀ 97% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Loss of personal independence in daily activities6523.0
18.2–29.2ROR 24.2 · χ² 1,348 / p 2e-295
22.9 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.9 · ♀ 81% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Haematotoxicity1221.8
12.4–38.3ROR 22.0 · χ² 218 / p 2e-49
20.9 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.5no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus infection2020.2
13.1–31.3ROR 20.6 · χ² 347 / p 1e-77
19.8 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Haemorrhage intracranial1719.1
11.9–30.6ROR 19.3 · χ² 273 / p 1e-61
18.5 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Wheezing6217.6
13.8–22.5ROR 18.5 · χ² 958 / p 1e-210
17.5 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.5 · ♀ 80% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete7317.4
13.9–21.7ROR 18.4 · χ² 1,113 / p 3e-244
17.3 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 22.6 · ♀ 84% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Burning sensation7217.3
13.8–21.6ROR 18.3 · χ² 1,091 / p 2e-239
17.2 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Lymphocyte count decreased1716.2
10.1–25.9ROR 16.4 · χ² 227 / p 1e-51
15.5 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.7no trial data cached
Clostridium difficile colitis1015.8
8.5–29.4ROR 16.0 · χ² 125 / p 3e-29
14.3 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (acid reflux)6914.5
11.5–18.2ROR 15.3 · χ² 855 / p 3e-188
14.4 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.7 · ♀ 98% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Multi-organ failure1413.4
8.0–22.6ROR 13.6 · χ² 149 / p 2e-34
12.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Cytokine release syndrome1412.4
7.3–20.8ROR 12.5 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
11.0 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.6no trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome2012.1
7.8–18.6ROR 12.2 · χ² 192 / p 6e-44
11.2 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Cardiac disorder6511.6
9.2–14.8ROR 12.2 · χ² 624 / p 4e-138
11.4 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Asthma7511.3
9.0–14.0ROR 11.9 · χ² 694 / p 3e-153
11.0 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.9 · ♀ 85% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Gastric ulcer1210.6
6.0–18.6ROR 10.7 · χ² 95 / p 9e-23
8.9 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.7no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia389.7
7.1–13.2ROR 9.9 · χ² 287 / p 1e-64
9.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Liver function test abnormal169.2
5.7–15.0ROR 9.3 · χ² 109 / p 8e-26
7.9 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Intentional product use issue489.2
7.0–12.1ROR 9.5 · χ² 343 / p 7e-77
8.7 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.3 · ♀ 95% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Plasma cell myeloma208.6
5.6–13.3ROR 8.7 · χ² 127 / p 9e-30
7.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Adverse event397.1
5.2–9.7ROR 7.3 · χ² 200 / p 1e-45
6.6 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.5 · ♀ 97% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Herpes zoster (shingles)247.0
4.7–10.4ROR 7.1 · χ² 118 / p 8e-28
6.3 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 6.8no trial data cached
Anhedonia106.4
3.4–11.8ROR 6.4 · χ² 40 / p 1e-10
5.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))465.7
4.3–7.6ROR 5.9 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40
5.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Drug exposure during pregnancy115.4
3.0–9.7ROR 5.4 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9
4.5 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Asthma7511.3
9.0–14.0ROR 11.9 · χ² 694 / p 3e-153
11.0 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.9 · ♀ 85% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete7317.4
13.9–21.7ROR 18.4 · χ² 1,113 / p 3e-244
17.3 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 22.6 · ♀ 84% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Burning sensation7217.3
13.8–21.6ROR 18.3 · χ² 1,091 / p 2e-239
17.2 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Sleep disorder due to a general medical condition7174.1
59.1–93.0ROR 78.6 · χ² 5,032 / p <1e-300
72.4 EB05 59.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 101.1 · ♀ 84% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (acid reflux)6914.5
11.5–18.2ROR 15.3 · χ² 855 / p 3e-188
14.4 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.7 · ♀ 98% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Hypothyroidism6735.5
28.1–44.8ROR 37.4 · χ² 2,207 / p <1e-300
35.1 EB05 28.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.9 · ♀ 97% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Cardiac disorder6511.6
9.2–14.8ROR 12.2 · χ² 624 / p 4e-138
11.4 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Loss of personal independence in daily activities6523.0
18.2–29.2ROR 24.2 · χ² 1,348 / p 2e-295
22.9 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.9 · ♀ 81% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Carpal tunnel syndrome6578.2
61.7–99.1ROR 82.4 · χ² 4,857 / p <1e-300
76.2 EB05 61.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 66.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Fibromyalgia6444.4
35.0–56.4ROR 46.8 · χ² 2,669 / p <1e-300
43.8 EB05 35.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Blood test abnormal6375.8
59.5–96.5ROR 79.8 · χ² 4,557 / p <1e-300
73.8 EB05 59.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 79.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Wheezing6217.6
13.8–22.5ROR 18.5 · χ² 958 / p 1e-210
17.5 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.5 · ♀ 80% (drug 57%)no trial data cached
Sleep apnoea syndrome6153.8
42.1–68.7ROR 56.5 · χ² 3,101 / p <1e-300
52.8 EB05 42.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 44.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Acyclovir ↔ Acute kidney injury.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Acyclovir?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Acyclovir are asthma, burning sensation, sleep disorder due to a general medical condition, gastrooesophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, cardiac disorder. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Acyclovir have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Acyclovir has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Acyclovir causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.