← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Advil Pm side effects: what 4,435 FDA adverse event reports show

Advil Pm · 97 reaction terms · 4,902 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

4,435 reports · 17% serious · 27 with death outcome · 69% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

for relief of occasional sleeplessness when associated with minor aches and pains helps you fall asleep and stay asleep

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 16Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 57 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug effective for unapproved indication28346.2
41.3–51.8ROR 49.3 · χ² 12,372 / p <1e-300
45.7 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1 · ♀ 90% (drug 69%) · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Restless legs syndrome5915.4
11.9–19.8ROR 15.6 · χ² 776 / p 4e-171
15.2 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect incomplete9912.7
10.5–15.5ROR 13.0 · χ² 1,058 / p 3e-232
12.6 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling jittery4912.2
9.2–16.1ROR 12.3 · χ² 490 / p 8e-109
11.9 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Poor quality sleep5412.0
9.2–15.6ROR 12.1 · χ² 530 / p 1e-117
11.7 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.4 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Middle insomnia4511.5
8.6–15.3ROR 11.6 · χ² 419 / p 2e-93
11.1 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.8 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Restlessness759.7
7.7–12.1ROR 9.8 · χ² 576 / p 2e-127
9.4 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.3 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Psychomotor hyperactivity318.8
6.2–12.5ROR 8.9 · χ² 206 / p 4e-47
8.1 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.9 · ♀ 90% (drug 69%) · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Product physical issue378.8
6.4–12.1ROR 8.9 · χ² 247 / p 5e-56
8.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=4 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Choking338.0
5.7–11.3ROR 8.1 · χ² 196 / p 6e-45
7.4 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.5 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Product use complaint267.9
5.4–11.7ROR 8.0 · χ² 151 / p 6e-35
7.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=8 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional product misuse1457.9
6.7–9.3ROR 8.1 · χ² 869 / p 2e-191
7.7 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.5 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect decreased847.3
5.9–9.0ROR 7.4 · χ² 449 / p 6e-100
7.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.6 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Nightmare537.2
5.5–9.4ROR 7.3 · χ² 278 / p 1e-62
6.8 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.8 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected217.0
4.6–10.8ROR 7.1 · χ² 103 / p 2e-24
6.2 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication3466.7
6.1–7.4ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,691 / p <1e-300
6.6 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.7 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Abnormal dreams366.1
4.4–8.5ROR 6.2 · χ² 149 / p 1e-34
5.7 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Expired product administered426.0
4.4–8.1ROR 6.0 · χ² 170 / p 4e-39
5.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Product taste abnormal165.6
3.5–9.2ROR 5.6 · χ² 56 / p 3e-14
4.9 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Coeliac disease115.3
2.9–9.6ROR 5.3 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
4.4 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.4no trial data cached
Gastric haemorrhage124.9
2.8–8.6ROR 4.9 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9
4.2 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.5no trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected434.5
3.4–6.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 114 / p 5e-27
4.3 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.8 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)874.3
3.5–5.4ROR 4.4 · χ² 222 / p 2e-50
4.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling abnormal2194.3
3.8–4.9ROR 4.5 · χ² 559 / p 9e-124
4.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)2404.3
3.8–4.8ROR 4.4 · χ² 602 / p 4e-133
4.2 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,1754.2
4.0–4.4ROR 5.4 · χ² 3,076 / p <1e-300
4.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Nervousness454.1
3.0–5.4ROR 4.1 · χ² 101 / p 6e-24
3.9 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Head discomfort154.0
2.4–6.7ROR 4.0 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
3.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Hypersomnia244.0
2.7–5.9ROR 4.0 · χ² 50 / p 7e-13
3.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Product complaint203.8
2.4–5.9ROR 3.8 · χ² 38 / p 3e-10
3.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Oral discomfort113.7
2.1–6.7ROR 3.7 · χ² 19 / p 5e-6
3.3 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Throat irritation343.6
2.6–5.0ROR 3.6 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
3.4 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.1 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication413.5
2.6–4.7ROR 3.5 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
3.4 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact98% consumerno trial data cached
Retching153.3
2.0–5.5ROR 3.3 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
3.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Fear193.3
2.1–5.2ROR 3.3 · χ² 28 / p 5e-8
3.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete473.1
2.4–4.2ROR 3.2 · χ² 67 / p 2e-16
3.1 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Sedation173.1
1.9–5.0ROR 3.1 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
2.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Muscle twitching142.9
1.7–4.8ROR 2.9 · χ² 15 / p 5e-5
2.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Intentional product use issue532.8
2.2–3.7ROR 2.9 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15
2.8 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9 · 94% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,1754.2
4.0–4.4ROR 5.4 · χ² 3,076 / p <1e-300
4.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication3466.7
6.1–7.4ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,691 / p <1e-300
6.6 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.7 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effective for unapproved indication28346.2
41.3–51.8ROR 49.3 · χ² 12,372 / p <1e-300
45.7 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1 · ♀ 90% (drug 69%) · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)2404.3
3.8–4.8ROR 4.4 · χ² 602 / p 4e-133
4.2 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.0 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling abnormal2194.3
3.8–4.9ROR 4.5 · χ² 559 / p 9e-124
4.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional product misuse1457.9
6.7–9.3ROR 8.1 · χ² 869 / p 2e-191
7.7 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.5 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Overdose1152.5
2.1–3.0ROR 2.6 · χ² 104 / p 1e-24
2.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect incomplete9912.7
10.5–15.5ROR 13.0 · χ² 1,058 / p 3e-232
12.6 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)874.3
3.5–5.4ROR 4.4 · χ² 222 / p 2e-50
4.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect decreased847.3
5.9–9.0ROR 7.4 · χ² 449 / p 6e-100
7.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.6 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect dose administered791.7
1.3–2.1ROR 1.7 · χ² 20 / p 3e-6
1.7 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Restlessness759.7
7.7–12.1ROR 9.8 · χ² 576 / p 2e-127
9.4 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.3 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Restless legs syndrome5915.4
11.9–19.8ROR 15.6 · χ² 776 / p 4e-171
15.2 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Poor quality sleep5412.0
9.2–15.6ROR 12.1 · χ² 530 / p 1e-117
11.7 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.4 · 91% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Advil Pm?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Advil Pm are somnolence, drug effective for unapproved indication, insomnia, feeling abnormal, dysphagia, restlessness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Advil Pm have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Advil Pm has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Advil Pm causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.