← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Albendazole side effects: what 1,886 FDA adverse event reports show

Albendazole · 121 reaction terms · 6,776 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Anthelmintic

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

1,886 reports · 86% serious · 310 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Albendazole tablet is an anthelmintic drug indicated for: Treatment of parenchymal neurocysticercosis due to active lesions caused by larval forms of the pork tapeworm, Taenia solium . ( 1.1 ) Treatment of cystic hydatid disease of the liver, lung, and peritoneum, caused by the larval form of the dog tapeworm, Echinococcus granulosus .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Albendazole tablets, USP are an orally administered anthelmintic drug.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 6Not in label — unassessed 31
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 81 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Impaired quality of life132102.9
87.2–121.4ROR 110.6 · χ² 13,109 / p <1e-300
100.5 EB05 86.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 100.8 · ♀ 24% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Tubulointerstitial nephritis13278.9
66.9–93.1ROR 84.8 · χ² 10,012 / p <1e-300
77.5 EB05 67.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.7 · ♀ 23% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Impaired work ability14173.6
62.7–86.3ROR 79.4 · χ² 9,965 / p <1e-300
72.4 EB05 62.9 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 62.8 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements15363.6
54.6–74.0ROR 69.1 · χ² 9,320 / p <1e-300
62.7 EB05 54.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.0 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Swollen tongue13146.8
39.6–55.2ROR 50.2 · χ² 5,807 / p <1e-300
46.3 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 43.8 · ♀ 23% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Systemic lupus erythematosus13542.6
36.2–50.1ROR 45.8 · χ² 5,429 / p <1e-300
42.2 EB05 36.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Nightmare13242.4
35.9–50.0ROR 45.5 · χ² 5,280 / p <1e-300
42.0 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.1 · ♀ 22% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Accidental overdose13440.9
34.7–48.2ROR 44.0 · χ² 5,167 / p <1e-300
40.5 EB05 35.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 45.0 · ♀ 23% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Rectal haemorrhage15740.6
35.0–47.2ROR 44.2 · χ² 6,020 / p <1e-300
40.3 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.1 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative15739.3
33.8–45.6ROR 42.7 · χ² 5,809 / p <1e-300
39.0 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.2 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Loss of personal independence in daily activities14734.5
29.5–40.3ROR 37.3 · χ² 4,740 / p <1e-300
34.2 EB05 29.8 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.4 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Haematochezia (blood in stool)16433.2
28.7–38.4ROR 36.2 · χ² 5,085 / p <1e-300
33.0 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.4 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Tinnitus (ringing in the ears)13532.7
27.8–38.5ROR 35.2 · χ² 4,115 / p <1e-300
32.5 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.7 · ♀ 24% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Medication error15130.3
26.0–35.3ROR 32.9 · χ² 4,253 / p <1e-300
30.1 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.9 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Eczema13429.7
25.2–35.0ROR 31.9 · χ² 3,686 / p <1e-300
29.5 EB05 25.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 57.8 · ♀ 22% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Vertigo (spinning dizziness)15027.4
23.5–32.0ROR 29.7 · χ² 3,793 / p <1e-300
27.3 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 24.8 · ♀ 23% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)15426.3
22.6–30.6ROR 28.5 · χ² 3,722 / p <1e-300
26.1 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.9 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Stress15524.0
20.6–27.9ROR 26.1 · χ² 3,399 / p <1e-300
23.9 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.5 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Dysgeusia (altered taste)13420.0
17.0–23.5ROR 21.4 · χ² 2,402 / p <1e-300
19.9 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 37.4 · ♀ 22% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional product use issue15419.5
16.8–22.7ROR 21.1 · χ² 2,691 / p <1e-300
19.4 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 19.1 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Arthritis13719.4
16.5–22.8ROR 20.8 · χ² 2,372 / p <1e-300
19.3 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.0 · ♀ 24% (drug 47%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Adverse drug reaction13316.6
14.0–19.5ROR 17.7 · χ² 1,933 / p <1e-300
16.5 EB05 14.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.0 · ♀ 26% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction)2216.2
10.7–24.6ROR 16.4 · χ² 299 / p 2e-67
15.8 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.9no trial data cached
Gastroenteritis2116.0
10.5–24.6ROR 16.2 · χ² 281 / p 2e-63
15.6 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Migraine13515.8
13.5–18.6ROR 17.0 · χ² 1,868 / p <1e-300
15.8 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.5 · ♀ 23% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot)13315.5
13.2–18.3ROR 16.6 · χ² 1,797 / p <1e-300
15.4 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4 · ♀ 23% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Palpitations (pounding heartbeat)14714.0
12.0–16.3ROR 15.1 · χ² 1,767 / p <1e-300
13.9 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.4 · ♀ 26% (drug 47%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Septic shock5313.6
10.5–17.8ROR 14.0 · χ² 609 / p 8e-135
13.5 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Stevens-johnson syndrome (severe blistering skin reaction)2713.5
9.3–19.6ROR 13.7 · χ² 300 / p 2e-67
13.0 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Encephalopathy2913.2
9.2–18.9ROR 13.4 · χ² 314 / p 1e-70
12.7 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Gastritis3113.1
9.3–18.6ROR 13.3 · χ² 335 / p 4e-75
12.7 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication6312.6
9.9–16.0ROR 13.0 · χ² 661 / p 5e-146
12.4 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached
Deformity1011.9
6.4–22.0ROR 11.9 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
9.8 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Abortion induced1011.8
6.4–21.9ROR 11.9 · χ² 88 / p 3e-21
9.7 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Generalised oedema1311.7
6.8–20.2ROR 11.8 · χ² 117 / p 1e-27
10.2 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached
Eosinophilia1811.5
7.2–18.2ROR 11.6 · χ² 162 / p 3e-37
10.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.6no trial data cached
Brain oedema1311.5
6.7–19.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 114 / p 7e-27
9.9 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.8no trial data cached
Emphysema1011.0
5.9–20.4ROR 11.0 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
8.9 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication23410.7
9.5–12.0ROR 12.0 · χ² 2,061 / p <1e-300
10.6 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product use in unapproved indication23410.7
9.5–12.0ROR 12.0 · χ² 2,061 / p <1e-300
10.6 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Condition aggravated2238.2
7.3–9.3ROR 9.2 · χ² 1,426 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Weight decreased (weight loss)1746.9
6.0–8.0ROR 7.5 · χ² 889 / p 9e-196
6.8 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.1 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Somnolence (drowsiness)1679.2
8.0–10.7ROR 10.0 · χ² 1,230 / p 9e-270
9.1 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.7 · ♀ 24% (drug 47%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Haematochezia (blood in stool)16433.2
28.7–38.4ROR 36.2 · χ² 5,085 / p <1e-300
33.0 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.4 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative15739.3
33.8–45.6ROR 42.7 · χ² 5,809 / p <1e-300
39.0 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.2 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Rectal haemorrhage15740.6
35.0–47.2ROR 44.2 · χ² 6,020 / p <1e-300
40.3 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 29.1 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration1569.8
8.4–11.4ROR 10.6 · χ² 1,236 / p 5e-271
9.7 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 16.2 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Stress15524.0
20.6–27.9ROR 26.1 · χ² 3,399 / p <1e-300
23.9 EB05 20.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.5 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional product use issue15419.5
16.8–22.7ROR 21.1 · χ² 2,691 / p <1e-300
19.4 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 19.1 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)15426.3
22.6–30.6ROR 28.5 · χ² 3,722 / p <1e-300
26.1 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.9 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements15363.6
54.6–74.0ROR 69.1 · χ² 9,320 / p <1e-300
62.7 EB05 54.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.0 · ♀ 20% (drug 47%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort15110.1
8.6–11.7ROR 10.8 · χ² 1,231 / p 7e-270
9.9 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.9no trial data cached
Medication error15130.3
26.0–35.3ROR 32.9 · χ² 4,253 / p <1e-300
30.1 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 32.9 · ♀ 21% (drug 47%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Albendazole?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Albendazole are pyrexia, weight decreased, somnolence, haematochezia, colitis ulcerative, rectal haemorrhage. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Albendazole have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Albendazole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Albendazole causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.