Allium Cepa side effects: what 440 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Non-Standardized Food Allergenic Extract
Who reports
440 reports · 46% serious · 25 with death outcome · 72% female
Used for
Temporarily relieves sneezing, runny nose, and watery eyes. CLAIMS BASED ON TRADITIONAL HOMEOPATHIC PRACTICE, NOT ACCEPTED MEDICAL EVIDENCE, NOT FDA EVALUATED. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 7 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
- No label text to screen No validated FDA label was retrievable for this product, so the screen could not run. Disproportionality only.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal allergy | 13 | 43.7 25.6–74.7ROR 45.0 · χ² 501 / p 3e-111 | 41.2 EB05 25.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis contact | 8 | 33.4 16.8–66.5ROR 34.0 · χ² 220 / p 4e-50 | 31.0 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=7 | no trial data cached |
| Infusion site pain | 7 | 26.0 12.5–54.3ROR 26.4 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33 | 23.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=4 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 6 | 19.2 8.7–42.4ROR 19.4 · χ² 86 / p 9e-21 | 16.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 41.4 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission in error | 7 | 12.4 5.9–25.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 62 / p 1e-15 | 9.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 17.5 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | 9 | 6.2 3.2–11.8ROR 6.3 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9 | 4.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 7.2 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis atopic | 5 | 4.7 2.0–11.4ROR 4.8 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4 | 3.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.3 | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal allergy | 13 | 43.7 25.6–74.7ROR 45.0 · χ² 501 / p 3e-111 | 41.2 EB05 25.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | 9 | 6.2 3.2–11.8ROR 6.3 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9 | 4.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 7.2 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis contact | 8 | 33.4 16.8–66.5ROR 34.0 · χ² 220 / p 4e-50 | 31.0 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=7 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission in error | 7 | 12.4 5.9–25.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 62 / p 1e-15 | 9.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 17.5 | no trial data cached |
| Infusion site pain | 7 | 26.0 12.5–54.3ROR 26.4 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33 | 23.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=4 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 6 | 19.2 8.7–42.4ROR 19.4 · χ² 86 / p 9e-21 | 16.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 41.4 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis atopic | 5 | 4.7 2.0–11.4ROR 4.8 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4 | 3.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.3 | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
| Scratch | 3 | 13.7 4.5–42.5ROR 13.8 · χ² 24 / p 5e-7 | 7.0 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Allium Cepa?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Allium Cepa are seasonal allergy, multiple sclerosis relapse, dermatitis contact, infusion site pain, insurance issue, dermatitis atopic. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Allium Cepa have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Allium Cepa has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Allium Cepa causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 29944998-a2df-002d-e063-6294a90ab8bd, effective 20250527; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"ALLIUM CEPA") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 8 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.