← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amlodipine Valsartan side effects: what 3,649 FDA adverse event reports show

Amlodipine Valsartan And Hydrochlorothiazide · 215 reaction terms · 6,175 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Thiazide Diuretic, Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Amlodipine Valsartan And Hydrochlorothiazide (Exforge Hct)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

3,649 reports · 93% serious · 501 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Exforge HCT (amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide) is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, to lower blood pressure. Lowering blood pressure reduces the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, primarily strokes and myocardial infarctions.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Exforge HCT is a fixed combination of amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide. Exforge HCT contains the besylate salt of amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB). Amlodipine besylate, USP is a white to pale yellow crystalline powder, slightly soluble in water and sparingly soluble in ethanol.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

FETAL TOXICITY When pregnancy is detected, discontinue Exforge HCT as soon as possible. (5.1) Drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus. (5.1) WARNING: FETAL TOXICITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 4Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 6Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 19
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 175 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hypertensive crisis4422.7
16.9–30.5ROR 23.0 · χ² 889 / p 9e-196
22.5 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 14.1 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Deafness9921.8
17.9–26.5ROR 22.4 · χ² 1,939 / p <1e-300
21.6 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.0 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure abnormal5917.2
13.3–22.1ROR 17.4 · χ² 880 / p 1e-193
17.0 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 15.2 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Product prescribing error6515.8
12.4–20.1ROR 16.1 · χ² 886 / p 6e-195
15.7 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.4 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure fluctuation6315.1
11.8–19.3ROR 15.3 · χ² 813 / p 4e-179
14.9 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 11.0 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Cardiomegaly3214.9
10.5–21.0ROR 15.0 · χ² 399 / p 4e-89
14.5 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 9.1 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure decreased17014.8
12.7–17.1ROR 15.4 · χ² 2,169 / p <1e-300
14.7 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 11.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure increased37814.2
12.9–15.6ROR 15.7 · χ² 4,651 / p <1e-300
14.2 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 12.3 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Spinal disorder1810.9
6.9–17.3ROR 11.0 · χ² 152 / p 3e-35
9.8 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Accident2110.2
6.6–15.6ROR 10.2 · χ² 164 / p 8e-38
9.2 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.1 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Blood sodium decreased3310.1
7.2–14.2ROR 10.2 · χ² 261 / p 5e-59
9.5 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Arrhythmia738.8
7.0–11.1ROR 9.0 · χ² 500 / p 6e-111
8.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Drug prescribing error298.6
6.0–12.3ROR 8.6 · χ² 186 / p 1e-42
7.8 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=27 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure systolic increased288.2
5.7–11.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 170 / p 3e-39
7.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 5.4 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in drug usage process507.8
5.9–10.3ROR 7.9 · χ² 290 / p 2e-65
7.4 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.1 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Hiatus hernia177.5
4.7–12.1ROR 7.6 · χ² 90 / p 1e-21
6.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Retinal detachment116.9
3.8–12.4ROR 6.9 · χ² 50 / p 1e-12
5.5 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Arteriosclerosis116.7
3.7–12.1ROR 6.7 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
5.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Blindness466.5
4.9–8.7ROR 6.6 · χ² 209 / p 1e-47
6.1 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Cataract676.5
5.1–8.2ROR 6.6 · χ² 307 / p 6e-69
6.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Eye haemorrhage156.5
3.9–10.7ROR 6.5 · χ² 64 / p 7e-16
5.5 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process2266.4
5.7–7.3ROR 6.8 · χ² 1,041 / p 1e-228
6.4 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 23.0 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Cerebral infarction276.3
4.4–9.2ROR 6.4 · χ² 116 / p 2e-27
5.8 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 3.9 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Hypertension (high blood pressure)2306.2
5.5–7.1ROR 6.6 · χ² 1,016 / p 3e-223
6.2 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.8 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Eating disorder236.2
4.1–9.3ROR 6.2 · χ² 95 / p 1e-22
5.6 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Kidney infection216.2
4.0–9.4ROR 6.2 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20
5.5 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Hypoacusis445.9
4.4–7.9ROR 6.0 · χ² 174 / p 5e-40
5.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Angina pectoris295.8
4.0–8.3ROR 5.8 · χ² 110 / p 5e-26
5.3 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Glaucoma195.7
3.6–8.9ROR 5.7 · χ² 68 / p 6e-17
5.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Fluid retention495.5
4.2–7.3ROR 5.6 · χ² 178 / p 6e-41
5.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Fear265.5
3.8–8.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 92 / p 5e-22
5.1 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Gastritis255.5
3.7–8.1ROR 5.5 · χ² 87 / p 6e-21
5.0 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5 · ♀ 84% (drug 58%)no trial data cached
Visual impairment1145.3
4.4–6.4ROR 5.5 · χ² 399 / p 6e-89
5.2 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.3 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Ankle fracture145.2
3.1–8.8ROR 5.2 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11
4.5 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Hypokinesia135.1
3.0–8.9ROR 5.2 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10
4.4 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Renal disorder415.0
3.7–6.8ROR 5.1 · χ² 129 / p 3e-30
4.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.8 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased225.0
3.3–7.6ROR 5.0 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
4.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.0no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Blood pressure increased37814.2
12.9–15.6ROR 15.7 · χ² 4,651 / p <1e-300
14.2 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 12.3 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Death2561.7
1.5–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 78 / p 6e-19
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 1.1 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Hypertension (high blood pressure)2306.2
5.5–7.1ROR 6.6 · χ² 1,016 / p 3e-223
6.2 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.8 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process2266.4
5.7–7.3ROR 6.8 · χ² 1,041 / p 1e-228
6.4 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 23.0 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)2072.7
2.4–3.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 226 / p 3e-51
2.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.7 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure decreased17014.8
12.7–17.1ROR 15.4 · χ² 2,169 / p <1e-300
14.7 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 11.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling abnormal1383.3
2.8–3.9ROR 3.4 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
3.3 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Cerebrovascular accident (stroke)1254.2
3.6–5.0ROR 4.3 · χ² 307 / p 5e-69
4.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Peripheral swelling1254.7
3.9–5.6ROR 4.8 · χ² 361 / p 9e-81
4.6 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Hypotension (low blood pressure)1173.4
2.8–4.0ROR 3.4 · χ² 193 / p 3e-44
3.3 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Visual impairment1145.3
4.4–6.4ROR 5.5 · χ² 399 / p 6e-89
5.2 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.3 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Gait disturbance1093.3
2.7–3.9ROR 3.3 · χ² 170 / p 3e-39
3.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Deafness9921.8
17.9–26.5ROR 22.4 · χ² 1,939 / p <1e-300
21.6 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.0 · 83% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Amlodipine (dihydropyridine CCBs) ↔ Peripheral oedema.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amlodipine Valsartan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amlodipine Valsartan are blood pressure increased, hypertension, malaise, diabetes mellitus, blood pressure decreased, feeling abnormal. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amlodipine Valsartan have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: FETAL TOXICITY When pregnancy is detected, discontinue Exforge HCT as soon as possible. (5.1) Drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus. (5.1) WARNING: FETAL TOXICITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.

Do FAERS signals prove that Amlodipine Valsartan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.