← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ampicillin and Sulbactam side effects: what 2,550 FDA adverse event reports show

Ampicillin Sodium And Sulbactam Sodium · 226 reaction terms · 3,949 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Ampicillin (Ampicillin)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

2,550 reports · 94% serious · 520 with death outcome · 48% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ampicillin capsules, ampicillin for oral suspension and other antibacterial drugs, ampicillin capsules and ampicillin for oral suspension should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Ampicillin trihydrate is a semisynthetic penicillin derived from the basic penicillin nucleus, 6- aminopenicillanic acid. Ampicillin is designated chemically as (2S, 5 R , 6 R )-6-[( R )-2-Amino-2-phenylacetamido]-3,3- dimethyl-7-oxo-4-thia-1-azabicyclo [3.2.0] heptane-2- carboxylic acid.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 7Likely indication confounding 2Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 186 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pneumonia aspiration5819.2
14.9–24.8ROR 19.6 · χ² 981 / p 1e-215
19.0 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 11.8 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (severe skin peeling reaction)3519.1
13.8–26.6ROR 19.4 · χ² 583 / p 5e-129
18.9 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Disseminated intravascular coagulation3218.7
13.2–26.4ROR 18.9 · χ² 517 / p 9e-115
18.4 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute respiratory distress syndrome3415.8
11.3–22.1ROR 16.0 · χ² 457 / p 9e-102
15.6 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Atelectasis1815.3
9.6–24.2ROR 15.4 · χ² 226 / p 2e-51
14.6 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased2713.9
9.6–20.3ROR 14.1 · χ² 311 / p 5e-70
13.5 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Deformity1513.2
8.0–21.8ROR 13.3 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36
12.1 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Osteonecrosis of jaw (jawbone death)3611.9
8.6–16.5ROR 12.1 · χ² 348 / p 5e-78
11.5 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Bacteraemia1711.9
7.4–19.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 159 / p 1e-36
10.8 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Sinus tachycardia2011.6
7.5–18.0ROR 11.7 · χ² 184 / p 4e-42
10.7 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Erythema multiforme1311.5
6.7–19.8ROR 11.5 · χ² 114 / p 6e-27
9.9 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Multi-organ failure2411.3
7.6–16.8ROR 11.4 · χ² 214 / p 8e-49
10.5 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased3011.1
7.8–15.9ROR 11.3 · χ² 267 / p 3e-60
10.5 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Osteomyelitis2410.9
7.3–16.3ROR 11.0 · χ² 206 / p 4e-47
10.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.8no trial data cached
Interstitial lung disease6410.9
8.6–13.9ROR 11.2 · χ² 567 / p 1e-125
10.6 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Septic shock5610.7
8.2–13.8ROR 10.9 · χ² 482 / p 5e-107
10.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.5 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
C-reactive protein increased4710.6
8.0–14.1ROR 10.8 · χ² 401 / p 1e-89
10.2 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc degeneration1210.6
6.0–18.7ROR 10.7 · χ² 95 / p 9e-23
8.9 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Cholecystitis1510.4
6.3–17.2ROR 10.5 · χ² 118 / p 8e-28
9.0 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Candida infection (yeast infection)2110.4
6.8–15.9ROR 10.4 · χ² 168 / p 8e-39
9.4 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Stevens-johnson syndrome (severe blistering skin reaction)2810.3
7.2–15.0ROR 10.5 · χ² 227 / p 1e-51
9.6 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Aspiration139.9
5.7–17.0ROR 9.9 · χ² 95 / p 9e-23
8.3 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.2no trial data cached
Anaphylactic shock309.6
6.8–13.8ROR 9.7 · χ² 224 / p 7e-51
8.9 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Malnutrition139.6
5.6–16.6ROR 9.7 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
8.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Blood urea increased199.3
5.9–14.5ROR 9.4 · χ² 132 / p 6e-31
8.2 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Renal failure acute489.2
6.9–12.2ROR 9.3 · χ² 342 / p 1e-76
8.7 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Leukocytosis209.1
5.9–14.1ROR 9.2 · χ² 136 / p 9e-32
8.1 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Iron deficiency anaemia109.0
4.8–16.6ROR 9.0 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
7.0 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Dental caries128.9
5.1–15.7ROR 9.0 · χ² 77 / p 9e-19
7.3 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5no trial data cached
Cellulitis (skin infection)548.8
6.8–11.5ROR 9.0 · χ² 367 / p 5e-82
8.4 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Arteriosclerosis108.7
4.7–16.2ROR 8.8 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
6.8 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Bone disorder198.5
5.4–13.3ROR 8.6 · χ² 119 / p 7e-28
7.4 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Renal tubular necrosis108.4
4.5–15.5ROR 8.4 · χ² 58 / p 2e-14
6.5 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.2no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Sepsis (blood infection)926.8
5.6–8.3ROR 7.0 · χ² 450 / p 3e-100
6.6 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Respiratory failure677.6
6.0–9.6ROR 7.7 · χ² 376 / p 5e-84
7.3 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Interstitial lung disease6410.9
8.6–13.9ROR 11.2 · χ² 567 / p 1e-125
10.6 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)604.4
3.4–5.7ROR 4.5 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36
4.3 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.8 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia aspiration5819.2
14.9–24.8ROR 19.6 · χ² 981 / p 1e-215
19.0 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 11.8 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Septic shock5610.7
8.2–13.8ROR 10.9 · χ² 482 / p 5e-107
10.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.5 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Cellulitis (skin infection)548.8
6.8–11.5ROR 9.0 · χ² 367 / p 5e-82
8.4 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Pleural effusion516.9
5.3–9.0ROR 7.0 · χ² 252 / p 6e-57
6.5 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Renal impairment484.7
3.6–6.2ROR 4.8 · χ² 138 / p 5e-32
4.5 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Renal failure acute489.2
6.9–12.2ROR 9.3 · χ² 342 / p 1e-76
8.7 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
C-reactive protein increased4710.6
8.0–14.1ROR 10.8 · χ² 401 / p 1e-89
10.2 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ampicillin and Sulbactam?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ampicillin and Sulbactam are sepsis, respiratory failure, interstitial lung disease, hepatic function abnormal, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ampicillin and Sulbactam have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Ampicillin and Sulbactam has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ampicillin and Sulbactam causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.