← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Citric Acid and Aspirin and Bicarbonate side effects: what 329 FDA adverse event reports show

Anhydrous Citric Acid, Aspirin, And Sodium Bicarbonate · 9 reaction terms · 123 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Citric Acid (Soothe Chewable)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

329 reports · 76% serious · 29 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

For the relief of Heartburn, acid indigestion, and upset stomach associated with these symptoms.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 7 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 5No label text to screen 2
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Gastric haemorrhage949.4
25.9–94.1ROR 50.8 · χ² 380 / p 8e-85
45.0 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 38.8no trial data cached
Choking1445.8
27.4–76.5ROR 47.8 · χ² 570 / p 3e-126
43.3 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 40.8no trial data cached
Incorrect drug administration duration1737.9
23.8–60.2ROR 39.9 · χ² 575 / p 3e-127
36.5 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 71.3no trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected2332.5
21.9–48.2ROR 34.8 · χ² 672 / p 2e-148
31.7 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 29.3 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug dependence3915.2
11.3–20.5ROR 17.1 · χ² 508 / p 7e-113
15.0 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.8 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Drug administration error612.3
5.5–27.1ROR 12.5 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
8.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 27.3no trial data cached
Wrong technique in drug usage process712.1
5.8–25.1ROR 12.3 · χ² 61 / p 4e-15
9.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug dependence3915.2
11.3–20.5ROR 17.1 · χ² 508 / p 7e-113
15.0 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.8 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected2332.5
21.9–48.2ROR 34.8 · χ² 672 / p 2e-148
31.7 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 29.3 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect drug administration duration1737.9
23.8–60.2ROR 39.9 · χ² 575 / p 3e-127
36.5 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 71.3no trial data cached
Choking1445.8
27.4–76.5ROR 47.8 · χ² 570 / p 3e-126
43.3 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 40.8no trial data cached
Gastric haemorrhage949.4
25.9–94.1ROR 50.8 · χ² 380 / p 8e-85
45.0 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 38.8no trial data cached
Wrong technique in drug usage process712.1
5.8–25.1ROR 12.3 · χ² 61 / p 4e-15
9.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.3no trial data cached
Drug administration error612.3
5.5–27.1ROR 12.5 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
8.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 27.3no trial data cached
Dependence44.6
1.7–12.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 8 / p 0.002
3.3 EB05 1.4 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal418.9
7.1–50.1ROR 19.1 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
12.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Zoledronic acid (bisphosphonates) ↔ Osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Citric Acid and Aspirin and Bicarbonate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Citric Acid and Aspirin and Bicarbonate are choking, gastric haemorrhage, dependence. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Citric Acid and Aspirin and Bicarbonate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Citric Acid and Aspirin and Bicarbonate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Citric Acid and Aspirin and Bicarbonate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.