← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Atazanavir and Cobicistat side effects: what 245 FDA adverse event reports show

Atazanavir And Cobicistat · 16 reaction terms · 220 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Protease inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Atazanavir (Reyataz)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

245 reports · 75% serious · 16 with death outcome · 43% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

REYATAZ ® is indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and in pediatric patients 3 months and older weighing at least 5 kg. Limitations of Use: • REYATAZ is not recommended for use in pediatric patients below the age of 3 months due to the risk of kernicterus .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

The active ingredient in REYATAZ capsules and oral powder is atazanavir sulfate, which is an HIV-1 protease inhibitor.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 12 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 9
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 4 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Anhedonia36116.5
86.1–157.5ROR 136.4 · χ² 4,006 / p <1e-300
109.7 EB05 82.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 87.7no trial data cached
Osteopenia18101.1
64.8–157.7ROR 109.0 · χ² 1,684 / p <1e-300
91.4 EB05 61.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 66.0no trial data cached
Hyperbilirubinaemia1083.1
45.3–152.6ROR 86.6 · χ² 731 / p 3e-161
72.1 EB05 41.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.0no trial data cached
Economic problem1372.2
42.6–122.7ROR 76.2 · χ² 843 / p 1e-185
65.6 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 55.8no trial data cached
Abortion induced654.5
24.7–120.2ROR 55.9 · χ² 264 / p 1e-59
46.8 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 43.6no trial data cached
Osteoporosis2552.0
35.9–75.4ROR 57.8 · χ² 1,201 / p 2e-263
50.1 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 46.0no trial data cached
Bone density decreased1848.7
31.2–75.9ROR 52.4 · χ² 794 / p 6e-175
46.4 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 41.4no trial data cached
Decreased activity540.0
16.8–95.2ROR 40.8 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
34.3 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Multiple fractures631.0
14.1–68.3ROR 31.7 · χ² 146 / p 8e-34
27.8 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.3no trial data cached
Emotional distress4028.2
21.2–37.4ROR 33.5 · χ² 1,027 / p 1e-225
27.8 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.9no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy2122.1
14.7–33.3ROR 24.1 · χ² 404 / p 3e-90
21.7 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.7no trial data cached
Abortion spontaneous817.0
8.6–33.7ROR 17.6 · χ² 105 / p 5e-25
14.9 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Emotional distress4028.2
21.2–37.4ROR 33.5 · χ² 1,027 / p 1e-225
27.8 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.9no trial data cached
Anhedonia36116.5
86.1–157.5ROR 136.4 · χ² 4,006 / p <1e-300
109.7 EB05 82.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 87.7no trial data cached
Osteoporosis2552.0
35.9–75.4ROR 57.8 · χ² 1,201 / p 2e-263
50.1 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 46.0no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy2122.1
14.7–33.3ROR 24.1 · χ² 404 / p 3e-90
21.7 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.7no trial data cached
Bone density decreased1848.7
31.2–75.9ROR 52.4 · χ² 794 / p 6e-175
46.4 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 41.4no trial data cached
Osteopenia18101.1
64.8–157.7ROR 109.0 · χ² 1,684 / p <1e-300
91.4 EB05 61.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 66.0no trial data cached
Economic problem1372.2
42.6–122.7ROR 76.2 · χ² 843 / p 1e-185
65.6 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 55.8no trial data cached
Hyperbilirubinaemia1083.1
45.3–152.6ROR 86.6 · χ² 731 / p 3e-161
72.1 EB05 41.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.0no trial data cached
Abortion spontaneous817.0
8.6–33.7ROR 17.6 · χ² 105 / p 5e-25
14.9 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached
Multiple fractures631.0
14.1–68.3ROR 31.7 · χ² 146 / p 8e-34
27.8 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.3no trial data cached
Abortion induced654.5
24.7–120.2ROR 55.9 · χ² 264 / p 1e-59
46.8 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 43.6no trial data cached
Decreased activity540.0
16.8–95.2ROR 40.8 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
34.3 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.9no trial data cached
Menstruation irregular412.9
4.9–34.1ROR 13.1 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
7.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Bone loss422.6
8.5–59.6ROR 22.9 · χ² 62 / p 1e-15
16.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.9no trial data cached
Premature delivery316.1
5.2–49.4ROR 16.2 · χ² 29 / p 4e-8
8.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Atazanavir and Cobicistat?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Atazanavir and Cobicistat are emotional distress, anhedonia, osteoporosis, bone density decreased, osteopenia, hyperbilirubinaemia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Atazanavir and Cobicistat have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Atazanavir and Cobicistat has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Atazanavir and Cobicistat causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.