← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Atenolol and Chlorthalidone side effects: what 753 FDA adverse event reports show

Atenolol And Chlorthalidone · 23 reaction terms · 570 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

beta-Adrenergic Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Atenolol (Atenolol)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

753 reports · 70% serious · 61 with death outcome · 66% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Hypertension Atenolol tablets are indicated for the treatment of hypertension, to lower blood pressure. Lowering blood pressure lowers the risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, primarily strokes and myocardial infarctions. These benefits have been seen in controlled trials of antihypertensive drugs from a wide variety of pharmacologic classes including atenolol.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Atenolol, USP, a synthetic, beta 1 -selective (cardioselective) adrenoreceptor blocking agent, may be chemically described as Benzeneacetamide, 4-[2-hydroxy-3-[(1-methylethyl)amino] propoxy]-. The molecular and structural formulas are: Atenolol (free base) has a molecular weight of 266.34.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 16 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Reporting / coding artifact 3Outcome field, not a reaction 1Not in label — unassessed 7
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 7 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hepatic steatosis4973.5
56.1–96.4ROR 78.6 · χ² 3,427 / p <1e-300
71.4 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 68.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Contraindicated product administered4743.5
32.9–57.3ROR 46.3 · χ² 1,907 / p <1e-300
42.7 EB05 33.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 44.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect decreased4729.5
22.4–38.9ROR 31.4 · χ² 1,268 / p 5e-278
29.2 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 47.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Drug intolerance7421.4
17.3–26.6ROR 23.7 · χ² 1,426 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 27.1 · ♀ 94% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Cardiac failure (heart failure)5017.3
13.3–22.7ROR 18.5 · χ² 756 / p 1e-166
17.2 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.3 · ♀ 98% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Multiple fractures915.1
7.9–29.0ROR 15.3 · χ² 105 / p 6e-25
13.1 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Sedation1415.0
8.9–25.1ROR 15.2 · χ² 169 / p 7e-39
14.0 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.9no trial data cached
Synovitis812.3
6.2–24.6ROR 12.5 · χ² 72 / p 8e-18
9.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached
Nightmare1310.4
6.1–17.9ROR 10.6 · χ² 102 / p 3e-24
8.8 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Femur fracture119.9
5.5–17.7ROR 10.0 · χ² 79 / p 3e-19
8.0 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Disability79.9
4.7–20.6ROR 9.9 · χ² 47 / p 3e-12
7.1 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Completed suicide (death by suicide)175.6
3.5–9.0ROR 5.7 · χ² 60 / p 4e-15
4.9 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug intolerance7421.4
17.3–26.6ROR 23.7 · χ² 1,426 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 27.1 · ♀ 94% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Cardiac failure (heart failure)5017.3
13.3–22.7ROR 18.5 · χ² 756 / p 1e-166
17.2 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.3 · ♀ 98% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Hepatic steatosis4973.5
56.1–96.4ROR 78.6 · χ² 3,427 / p <1e-300
71.4 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 68.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect decreased4729.5
22.4–38.9ROR 31.4 · χ² 1,268 / p 5e-278
29.2 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 47.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Contraindicated product administered4743.5
32.9–57.3ROR 46.3 · χ² 1,907 / p <1e-300
42.7 EB05 33.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 44.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)no trial data cached
Completed suicide (death by suicide)175.6
3.5–9.0ROR 5.7 · χ² 60 / p 4e-15
4.9 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Sedation1415.0
8.9–25.1ROR 15.2 · χ² 169 / p 7e-39
14.0 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.9no trial data cached
Nightmare1310.4
6.1–17.9ROR 10.6 · χ² 102 / p 3e-24
8.8 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4no trial data cached
Femur fracture119.9
5.5–17.7ROR 10.0 · χ² 79 / p 3e-19
8.0 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Multiple fractures915.1
7.9–29.0ROR 15.3 · χ² 105 / p 6e-25
13.1 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Synovitis812.3
6.2–24.6ROR 12.5 · χ² 72 / p 8e-18
9.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Atenolol and Chlorthalidone?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Atenolol and Chlorthalidone are liver disorder, cardiac failure congestive, cardiac failure, hepatic enzyme increased, hepatic steatosis, gastrointestinal disorder. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Atenolol and Chlorthalidone have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Atenolol and Chlorthalidone has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Atenolol and Chlorthalidone causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.