← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Avatrombopag Maleate side effects: what 2,215 FDA adverse event reports show

Avatrombopag Maleate · Doptelet, Doptelet Sprinkle · 32 reaction terms · 1,109 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Thrombopoietin receptor agonist

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Doptelet, Doptelet Sprinkle

openFDA label

Who reports

2,215 reports · 35% serious · 128 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

DOPTELET is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of: Thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure. ( 1.1 ) Thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an insufficient response to a previous treatment.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

The active ingredient in DOPTELET is avatrombopag maleate, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 15 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 3Reporting / coding artifact 8Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 1
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 17 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Platelet count increased201147.8
129.4–168.8ROR 162.4 · χ² 28,721 / p <1e-300
143.5 EB05 127.6 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 69.2 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Petechiae1614.6
8.9–23.7ROR 14.7 · χ² 189 / p 3e-43
13.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected1812.1
7.6–19.2ROR 12.2 · χ² 172 / p 1e-39
11.1 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=5no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding1510.4
6.3–17.2ROR 10.4 · χ² 118 / p 9e-28
9.0 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.3no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue115.1
2.8–9.2ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 6e-9
4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Laboratory test abnormal154.8
2.9–8.0ROR 4.8 · χ² 42 / p 6e-11
4.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission134.5
2.6–7.7ROR 4.5 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
3.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration814.3
3.5–5.4ROR 4.5 · χ² 206 / p 5e-47
4.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Adverse drug reaction394.1
3.0–5.6ROR 4.2 · χ² 90 / p 1e-21
3.9 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.0 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional product misuse363.9
2.8–5.4ROR 4.0 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
3.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue1113.7
3.1–4.4ROR 3.8 · χ² 218 / p 1e-49
3.6 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.1 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Emotional disorder103.0
1.6–5.7ROR 3.1 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
2.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Platelet count increased201147.8
129.4–168.8ROR 162.4 · χ² 28,721 / p <1e-300
143.5 EB05 127.6 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 69.2 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue1113.7
3.1–4.4ROR 3.8 · χ² 218 / p 1e-49
3.6 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.1 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration814.3
3.5–5.4ROR 4.5 · χ² 206 / p 5e-47
4.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Adverse drug reaction394.1
3.0–5.6ROR 4.2 · χ² 90 / p 1e-21
3.9 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.0 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional product misuse363.9
2.8–5.4ROR 4.0 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
3.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect less than expected1812.1
7.6–19.2ROR 12.2 · χ² 172 / p 1e-39
11.1 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=5no trial data cached
Petechiae1614.6
8.9–23.7ROR 14.7 · χ² 189 / p 3e-43
13.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Laboratory test abnormal154.8
2.9–8.0ROR 4.8 · χ² 42 / p 6e-11
4.2 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding1510.4
6.3–17.2ROR 10.4 · χ² 118 / p 9e-28
9.0 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.3no trial data cached
Intentional dose omission134.5
2.6–7.7ROR 4.5 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
3.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue115.1
2.8–9.2ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 6e-9
4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Emotional disorder103.0
1.6–5.7ROR 3.1 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
2.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Avatrombopag?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Avatrombopag are platelet count decreased, platelet count increased, haemorrhage, deep vein thrombosis, petechiae, gingival bleeding. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Avatrombopag have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Avatrombopag has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Avatrombopag causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.