← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Bacteriostatic Water side effects: what 388 FDA adverse event reports show

Bacteriostatic Water · 10 reaction terms · 89 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

388 reports · 40% serious · 12 with death outcome · 74% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

This parenteral preparation is indicated only for diluting or dissolving drugs for intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, according to instructions of the manufacturer of the drug to be administered.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION The following preparation is designed solely for parenteral use only after addition of drugs that require dilution or must be dissolved in an aqueous vehicle prior to injection. Ba.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 5 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 1
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 5 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Therapy interrupted3325.9
18.7–35.8ROR 28.2 · χ² 766 / p 6e-169
25.5 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 58.5 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Blood triglycerides increased824.4
12.3–48.4ROR 24.9 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36
22.6 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 27.3no trial data cached
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased919.3
10.1–36.8ROR 19.7 · χ² 139 / p 3e-32
17.8 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 27.7no trial data cached
Needle issue917.0
8.9–32.4ROR 17.4 · χ² 120 / p 3e-28
15.3 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Blood glucose decreased1011.2
6.1–20.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
9.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Therapy interrupted3325.9
18.7–35.8ROR 28.2 · χ² 766 / p 6e-169
25.5 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 58.5 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Blood glucose decreased1011.2
6.1–20.7ROR 11.5 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
9.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached
Needle issue917.0
8.9–32.4ROR 17.4 · χ² 120 / p 3e-28
15.3 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased919.3
10.1–36.8ROR 19.7 · χ² 139 / p 3e-32
17.8 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 27.7no trial data cached
Blood triglycerides increased824.4
12.3–48.4ROR 24.9 · χ² 157 / p 3e-36
22.6 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 27.3no trial data cached
Injection site mass45.9
2.2–15.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 12 / p 3e-4
3.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1no trial data cached
Diabetic ketoacidosis49.0
3.4–23.9ROR 9.1 · χ² 21 / p 2e-6
5.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.9no trial data cached
Product preparation error410.4
3.9–27.7ROR 10.5 · χ² 25 / p 2e-7
6.1 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Syringe issue412.3
4.7–32.7ROR 12.5 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
7.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Poor venous access420.9
7.9–55.5ROR 21.2 · χ² 57 / p 2e-14
14.9 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Bacteriostatic Water?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Bacteriostatic Water are blood glucose decreased, needle issue, glycosylated haemoglobin increased, blood triglycerides increased, injection site mass, diabetic ketoacidosis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Bacteriostatic Water have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Bacteriostatic Water has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Bacteriostatic Water causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.