← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Bayer Genuine Aspirin side effects: what 833 FDA adverse event reports show

Bayer Genuine Aspirin · 27 reaction terms · 836 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

833 reports · 71% serious · 63 with death outcome · 63% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

temporarily relieves headache muscle pain toothache menstrual pain pain and fever of colds minor pain of arthritis

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 18 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 8Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 7
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 9 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Gastric haemorrhage2554.4
37.0–80.1ROR 56.1 · χ² 1,256 / p 2e-275
52.3 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 45.5 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect drug administration duration3732.7
23.9–44.8ROR 34.2 · χ² 1,105 / p 1e-242
32.2 EB05 24.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 40.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Product use issue22129.8
26.6–33.4ROR 40.2 · χ² 6,168 / p <1e-300
29.7 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric ulcer2229.1
19.3–44.0ROR 29.9 · χ² 570 / p 4e-126
28.5 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.8 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Drug hypersensitivity15119.6
17.0–22.6ROR 23.7 · χ² 2,667 / p <1e-300
19.5 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.5 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Expired product administered2519.0
12.9–27.9ROR 19.5 · χ² 408 / p 4e-91
18.7 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Ulcer1117.4
9.7–31.3ROR 17.6 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
16.2 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.7no trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected3117.3
12.3–24.5ROR 18.0 · χ² 462 / p 9e-103
17.1 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 40.7 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Medication error3716.8
12.3–23.0ROR 17.5 · χ² 535 / p 1e-118
16.6 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.1 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Haematemesis (vomiting blood)1413.9
8.2–23.3ROR 14.1 · χ² 155 / p 8e-36
12.7 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Blood urine present1013.2
7.1–24.5ROR 13.4 · χ² 101 / p 4e-24
11.3 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.7no trial data cached
Extra dose administered2012.6
8.2–19.5ROR 12.9 · χ² 203 / p 2e-46
11.8 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Melaena (black stool)1011.4
6.2–21.1ROR 11.5 · χ² 85 / p 2e-20
9.3 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4no trial data cached
Drug administration error1411.3
6.7–19.0ROR 11.5 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
9.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 26.9no trial data cached
Intentional product misuse3610.4
7.6–14.4ROR 10.9 · χ² 299 / p 3e-67
9.9 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in drug usage process138.9
5.2–15.2ROR 9.0 · χ² 83 / p 3e-20
7.3 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 16.5no trial data cached
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)517.3
5.6–9.5ROR 7.7 · χ² 273 / p 1e-61
6.9 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · ♀ 39% (drug 63%) · 96% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product use issue22129.8
26.6–33.4ROR 40.2 · χ² 6,168 / p <1e-300
29.7 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Drug hypersensitivity15119.6
17.0–22.6ROR 23.7 · χ² 2,667 / p <1e-300
19.5 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.5 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)517.3
5.6–9.5ROR 7.7 · χ² 273 / p 1e-61
6.9 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · ♀ 39% (drug 63%) · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Medication error3716.8
12.3–23.0ROR 17.5 · χ² 535 / p 1e-118
16.6 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.1 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Incorrect drug administration duration3732.7
23.9–44.8ROR 34.2 · χ² 1,105 / p 1e-242
32.2 EB05 24.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 40.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional product misuse3610.4
7.6–14.4ROR 10.9 · χ² 299 / p 3e-67
9.9 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected3117.3
12.3–24.5ROR 18.0 · χ² 462 / p 9e-103
17.1 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 40.7 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Expired product administered2519.0
12.9–27.9ROR 19.5 · χ² 408 / p 4e-91
18.7 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric haemorrhage2554.4
37.0–80.1ROR 56.1 · χ² 1,256 / p 2e-275
52.3 EB05 37.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 45.5 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Gastric ulcer2229.1
19.3–44.0ROR 29.9 · χ² 570 / p 4e-126
28.5 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.8 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Extra dose administered2012.6
8.2–19.5ROR 12.9 · χ² 203 / p 2e-46
11.8 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12 · 95% consumerno trial data cached
Drug administration error1411.3
6.7–19.0ROR 11.5 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
9.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 26.9no trial data cached
Haematemesis (vomiting blood)1413.9
8.2–23.3ROR 14.1 · χ² 155 / p 8e-36
12.7 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Wrong technique in drug usage process138.9
5.2–15.2ROR 9.0 · χ² 83 / p 3e-20
7.3 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 16.5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Bayer Genuine Aspirin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Bayer Genuine Aspirin are drug hypersensitivity, myocardial infarction, haemorrhage, gastric haemorrhage, gastric ulcer, extra dose administered. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Bayer Genuine Aspirin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Bayer Genuine Aspirin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Bayer Genuine Aspirin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.