← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Betaine side effects: what 1,034 FDA adverse event reports show

Betaine · 22 reaction terms · 396 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Methylating Agent

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

1,034 reports · 62% serious · 71 with death outcome · 50% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Betaine Anhydrous for Oral Solution is indicated for the treatment of homocystinuria to decrease elevated homocysteine blood concentrations in pediatric and adult patients. Included within the category of homocystinuria are Cystathionine beta-synthase .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Betaine Anhydrous for Oral Solution is an agent for the treatment of homocystinuria. It contains no ingredients other than anhydrous betaine. Betaine Anhydrous for Oral Solution is a white to off-white, crystalline, hygroscopic powder, which is diluted in water and administered orally.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 19 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 9Not in label — unassessed 10
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 3 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Gastroenteritis viral2932.5
22.7–46.6ROR 33.4 · χ² 854 / p 4e-188
31.9 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Brain oedema1828.9
18.3–45.8ROR 29.4 · χ² 458 / p 8e-102
28.1 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.9no trial data cached
Product odour abnormal1019.5
10.5–36.2ROR 19.7 · χ² 158 / p 2e-36
18.3 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3no trial data cached
Pharyngitis streptococcal1018.7
10.1–34.7ROR 18.9 · χ² 151 / p 6e-35
17.4 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Prescribed overdose1717.8
11.1–28.6ROR 18.1 · χ² 253 / p 2e-57
17.3 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.5no trial data cached
Product dose omission5516.9
13.0–21.8ROR 17.7 · χ² 806 / p 1e-177
16.7 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.8 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Therapy change714.7
7.0–30.8ROR 14.8 · χ² 76 / p 1e-18
11.8 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=5no trial data cached
Gastroenteritis1013.9
7.5–25.8ROR 14.1 · χ² 107 / p 2e-25
12.1 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Treatment noncompliance3011.2
7.9–15.9ROR 11.5 · χ² 269 / p 9e-61
10.6 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.3no trial data cached
Disseminated intravascular coagulation710.1
4.8–21.0ROR 10.1 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
7.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Poor quality product administered59.9
4.1–23.8ROR 10.0 · χ² 32 / p 9e-9
6.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Cholestasis (bile flow blockage)99.6
5.0–18.3ROR 9.6 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
7.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal69.1
4.1–20.1ROR 9.1 · χ² 35 / p 1e-9
6.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Hepatocellular injury68.6
3.9–19.0ROR 8.6 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
5.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Overdose868.1
6.6–9.9ROR 8.7 · χ² 530 / p 2e-117
7.8 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of drug administration267.3
5.0–10.7ROR 7.5 · χ² 136 / p 1e-31
6.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Underdose226.1
4.0–9.2ROR 6.2 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
5.5 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.6no trial data cached
Abortion spontaneous84.0
2.0–8.0ROR 4.1 · χ² 15 / p 4e-5
3.4 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Drug dose omission232.8
1.9–4.2ROR 2.8 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
2.7 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 50%) · 83% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Overdose868.1
6.6–9.9ROR 8.7 · χ² 530 / p 2e-117
7.8 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Product dose omission5516.9
13.0–21.8ROR 17.7 · χ² 806 / p 1e-177
16.7 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.8 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Treatment noncompliance3011.2
7.9–15.9ROR 11.5 · χ² 269 / p 9e-61
10.6 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.3no trial data cached
Gastroenteritis viral2932.5
22.7–46.6ROR 33.4 · χ² 854 / p 4e-188
31.9 EB05 23.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of drug administration267.3
5.0–10.7ROR 7.5 · χ² 136 / p 1e-31
6.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Drug dose omission232.8
1.9–4.2ROR 2.8 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
2.7 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.2 · ♀ 22% (drug 50%) · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Underdose226.1
4.0–9.2ROR 6.2 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
5.5 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 13.6no trial data cached
Brain oedema1828.9
18.3–45.8ROR 29.4 · χ² 458 / p 8e-102
28.1 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.9no trial data cached
Prescribed overdose1717.8
11.1–28.6ROR 18.1 · χ² 253 / p 2e-57
17.3 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.5no trial data cached
Gastroenteritis1013.9
7.5–25.8ROR 14.1 · χ² 107 / p 2e-25
12.1 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Pharyngitis streptococcal1018.7
10.1–34.7ROR 18.9 · χ² 151 / p 6e-35
17.4 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Product odour abnormal1019.5
10.5–36.2ROR 19.7 · χ² 158 / p 2e-36
18.3 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3no trial data cached
Cholestasis (bile flow blockage)99.6
5.0–18.3ROR 9.6 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
7.3 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Abortion spontaneous84.0
2.0–8.0ROR 4.1 · χ² 15 / p 4e-5
3.4 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Disseminated intravascular coagulation710.1
4.8–21.0ROR 10.1 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
7.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Betaine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Betaine are gastroenteritis viral, brain oedema, prescribed overdose, gastroenteritis, pharyngitis streptococcal, cholestasis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Betaine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Betaine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Betaine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.