← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Busulfan side effects: what 15,644 FDA adverse event reports show

Busulfan · 1,024 reaction terms · 56,495 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Alkylating Drug

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

15,644 reports · 95% serious · 4,592 with death outcome · 43% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Busulfan Injection is indicated for use in combination with cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Busulfan Injection is an alkylating drug indicate.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Busulfan is a bifunctional alkylating agent known chemically as 1,4-butanediol, dimethanesulfonate.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

MYELOSUPPRESSION Busulfan Injection causes severe and prolonged myelosuppression at the recommended dosage. Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation is required to prevent potentially fatal complications of the prolonged myelosuppression [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 18Likely indication confounding 1Not in label — unassessed 20
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 984 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Rhizobium radiobacter bacteraemia138,591.8
1,939.0–38,070.8ROR 8,598.9 · χ² 13,765 / p <1e-300
425.7 EB05 264.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial arm names this drug
Actinomycotic sepsis183,398.9
1,419.8–8,136.6ROR 3,402.9 · χ² 16,182 / p <1e-300
472.2 EB05 316.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial arm names this drug
Ovarian atrophy27626.1
396.2–989.5ROR 627.2 · χ² 11,014 / p <1e-300
326.7 EB05 235.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Disseminated toxoplasmosis29451.0
295.9–687.2ROR 451.8 · χ² 9,375 / p <1e-300
275.4 EB05 201.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome15450.6
250.8–809.5ROR 451.0 · χ² 4,689 / p <1e-300
235.6 EB05 151.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial arm names this drug
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome39402.7
281.5–576.2ROR 403.7 · χ² 11,673 / p <1e-300
268.3 EB05 204.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 76% (drug 43%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Primary hypogonadism36399.9
275.5–580.4ROR 400.8 · χ² 10,693 / p <1e-300
264.2 EB05 199.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 83% (drug 43%) · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Venoocclusive disease525356.1
323.8–391.6ROR 368.4 · χ² 146,173 / p <1e-300
277.9 EB05 258.5 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=525no trial arm names this drug
Chimerism18339.9
202.5–570.4ROR 340.3 · χ² 4,572 / p <1e-300
210.4 EB05 140.8 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial arm names this drug
Retinopathy haemorrhagic13324.2
176.8–594.6ROR 324.5 · χ² 3,109 / p <1e-300
188.8 EB05 117.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial arm names this drug
Chronic graft versus host disease in intestine36321.5
223.4–462.6ROR 322.3 · χ² 8,996 / p <1e-300
227.6 EB05 171.8 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction10314.7
157.9–627.1ROR 314.9 · χ² 2,279 / p <1e-300
171.7 EB05 99.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial arm names this drug
Acute graft versus host disease in intestine255298.3
260.6–341.4ROR 303.2 · χ² 61,404 / p <1e-300
239.2 EB05 215.5 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=255 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Venoocclusive liver disease875290.7
270.6–312.2ROR 307.8 · χ² 206,869 / p <1e-300
237.2 EB05 224.3 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=873 · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Hyperfibrinogenaemia12288.4
154.5–538.4ROR 288.6 · χ² 2,590 / p <1e-300
172.4 EB05 105.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial arm names this drug
Viruria18276.7
166.5–459.7ROR 277.0 · χ² 3,863 / p <1e-300
184.4 EB05 123.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial arm names this drug
Retinitis viral20269.8
166.8–436.2ROR 270.1 · χ² 4,227 / p <1e-300
184.9 EB05 126.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Epstein-barr virus infection reactivation191238.6
204.7–278.2ROR 241.6 · χ² 38,086 / p <1e-300
198.3 EB05 175.8 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=190 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Bone marrow transplant rejection31216.8
148.3–316.9ROR 217.2 · χ² 5,537 / p <1e-300
167.3 EB05 123.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=31 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Short stature34200.6
139.9–287.7ROR 201.1 · χ² 5,692 / p <1e-300
158.9 EB05 118.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 43%) · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Graft versus host disease914194.0
181.4–207.6ROR 206.0 · χ² 152,949 / p <1e-300
168.7 EB05 159.8 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 103.1 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Herpes zoster infection neurological20190.2
119.0–303.8ROR 190.4 · χ² 3,127 / p <1e-300
143.8 EB05 98.3 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 90% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Busulfan only as a background or rescue medication (NCT00049517, NCT00416598); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,0193.1
3.0–3.3ROR 3.4 · χ² 3,031 / p <1e-300
3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4 · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Product use in unapproved indication1,7239.5
9.1–10.0ROR 10.6 · χ² 13,181 / p <1e-300
9.4 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.4 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,0761.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9 · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Graft versus host disease914194.0
181.4–207.6ROR 206.0 · χ² 152,949 / p <1e-300
168.7 EB05 159.8 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 103.1 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Venoocclusive liver disease875290.7
270.6–312.2ROR 307.8 · χ² 206,869 / p <1e-300
237.2 EB05 224.3 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=873 · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Febrile neutropenia86317.7
16.6–18.9ROR 18.7 · χ² 13,435 / p <1e-300
17.5 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.6 · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)5666.8
6.3–7.4ROR 7.1 · χ² 2,814 / p <1e-300
6.8 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.2 · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Infection5335.0
4.6–5.4ROR 5.1 · χ² 1,692 / p <1e-300
4.9 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.8 · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Busulfan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Busulfan are mucosal inflammation, graft versus host disease, venoocclusive liver disease, cytomegalovirus infection, febrile neutropenia, acute graft versus host disease. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Busulfan have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: MYELOSUPPRESSION Busulfan Injection causes severe and prolonged myelosuppression at the recommended dosage. Hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation is required to prevent potentially fatal complications of the prolonged myelosuppression [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Busulfan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.