← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine side effects: what 6,074 FDA adverse event reports show

Cabotegravir And Rilpivirine · 95 reaction terms · 5,319 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Hiv-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor (insti)

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Cabotegravir (Apretude)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

6,074 reports · 20% serious · 113 with death outcome · 30% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

APRETUDE is indicated for pre‑exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection in adults and adolescents weighing at least 35 kg who are at risk for HIV-1 acquisition. Individuals must have a negative HIV-1 test prior.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

APRETUDE contains cabotegravir extended-release injectable suspension, an HIV INSTI.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

RISK OF DRUG RESISTANCE WITH USE OF APRETUDE FOR HIV-1 PRE‑EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PrEP) IN UNDIAGNOSED HIV-1 INFECTION Individuals must be tested for HIV-1 infection prior to initiating APRETUDE or oral cabotegravir, .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 38 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 12Reporting / coding artifact 15Not in label — unassessed 8
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 57 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product complaint20428.3
24.7–32.4ROR 29.2 · χ² 5,308 / p <1e-300
28.0 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact97% clinicianno trial data cached
Nodule7319.3
15.4–24.3ROR 19.5 · χ² 1,243 / p 1e-272
19.1 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Product administered at inappropriate site6011.4
8.8–14.6ROR 11.5 · χ² 557 / p 2e-123
11.1 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=6no trial data cached
Wrong technique in device usage process1299.7
8.2–11.5ROR 9.9 · χ² 999 / p 1e-219
9.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=18 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy1729.5
8.2–11.0ROR 9.8 · χ² 1,304 / p 7e-286
9.4 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 30%) · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Product administration error518.8
6.7–11.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 344 / p 4e-77
8.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.4 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue7038.5
7.9–9.1ROR 9.5 · χ² 4,697 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Product storage error1857.4
6.4–8.5ROR 7.6 · χ² 1,012 / p 2e-222
7.2 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Product preparation error335.5
3.9–7.7ROR 5.5 · χ² 116 / p 2e-27
5.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Sciatica224.8
3.1–7.2ROR 4.8 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15
4.4 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Product dispensing error304.7
3.3–6.8ROR 4.8 · χ² 85 / p 2e-20
4.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Treatment failure1064.4
3.7–5.4ROR 4.5 · χ² 280 / p 4e-63
4.4 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Abscess204.3
2.8–6.7ROR 4.3 · χ² 48 / p 3e-12
4.0 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Gait inability414.3
3.1–5.8ROR 4.3 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
4.1 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4no trial data cached
Incorrect route of product administration183.7
2.3–5.8ROR 3.7 · χ² 33 / p 6e-9
3.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Exposure via skin contact243.6
2.4–5.4ROR 3.7 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
3.4 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration1853.6
3.1–4.1ROR 3.7 · χ² 347 / p 1e-77
3.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.5no trial data cached
Presyncope (near-fainting)243.4
2.3–5.1ROR 3.4 · χ² 38 / p 3e-10
3.2 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Psychotic disorder293.4
2.3–4.9ROR 3.4 · χ² 46 / p 6e-12
3.2 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.8 · ♀ 0% (drug 30%)no trial data cached
Injection site reaction673.4
2.6–4.3ROR 3.4 · χ² 109 / p 9e-26
3.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Mass133.2
1.9–5.5ROR 3.2 · χ² 17 / p 2e-5
2.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Liver function test increased162.6
1.6–4.2ROR 2.6 · χ² 14 / p 1e-4
2.5 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Musculoskeletal pain372.4
1.7–3.3ROR 2.4 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8
2.4 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Muscle tightness112.3
1.3–4.2ROR 2.3 · χ² 7 / p 0.004
2.2 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Treatment noncompliance322.0
1.4–2.9ROR 2.0 · χ² 16 / p 4e-5
2.0 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Drug resistance152.0
1.2–3.3ROR 2.0 · χ² 7 / p 0.005
2.0 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product dose omission issue7038.5
7.9–9.1ROR 9.5 · χ² 4,697 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)4351.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 137 / p 7e-32
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.8 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Pain2871.6
1.4–1.8ROR 1.6 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Product complaint20428.3
24.7–32.4ROR 29.2 · χ² 5,308 / p <1e-300
28.0 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact97% clinicianno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration1853.6
3.1–4.1ROR 3.7 · χ² 347 / p 1e-77
3.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.5no trial data cached
Product storage error1857.4
6.4–8.5ROR 7.6 · χ² 1,012 / p 2e-222
7.2 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy1729.5
8.2–11.0ROR 9.8 · χ² 1,304 / p 7e-286
9.4 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 30%) · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Wrong technique in device usage process1299.7
8.2–11.5ROR 9.9 · χ² 999 / p 1e-219
9.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=18 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Incorrect dose administered1121.7
1.4–2.1ROR 1.7 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Treatment failure1064.4
3.7–5.4ROR 4.5 · χ² 280 / p 4e-63
4.4 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Product use issue1051.9
1.6–2.3ROR 1.9 · χ² 47 / p 5e-12
1.9 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Depression1031.5
1.3–1.9ROR 1.6 · χ² 20 / p 5e-6
1.5 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 2.7no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine are injection site pain, pain, injection site nodule, depression, injection site swelling. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF DRUG RESISTANCE WITH USE OF APRETUDE FOR HIV-1 PRE‑EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PrEP) IN UNDIAGNOSED HIV-1 INFECTION Individuals must be tested for HIV-1 infection prior to initiating APRETUDE or oral cabotegravir, .

Do FAERS signals prove that Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.