Cangrelor side effects: what 399 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
P2Y12 Platelet Inhibitor
Brand names
Kengreal
Who reports
399 reports · 72% serious · 84 with death outcome · 35% female
Used for
KENGREAL is indicated as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), repeat coronary revascularization, and stent thrombosis (ST) in patients who have not been treated with a P2Y 12 platelet inhibitor and are not being given a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor .
What it is
KENGREAL is a direct-acting P2Y 12 platelet receptor inhibitor that blocks adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet activation and aggregation.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 6 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic shock | 15 | 55.3 33.6–90.9ROR 57.4 · χ² 746 / p 1e-164 | 51.8 EB05 33.3 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 44.3 | no trial data cached |
| Haemorrhage intracranial | 10 | 35.0 19.0–64.6ROR 35.9 · χ² 298 / p 6e-67 | 33.0 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 28.2 | no trial data cached |
| Ventricular fibrillation | 7 | 33.0 15.9–68.9ROR 33.6 · χ² 187 / p 9e-43 | 30.3 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 26.6 | no trial data cached |
| Eosinophilia | 8 | 24.1 12.1–47.8ROR 24.5 · χ² 155 / p 8e-36 | 22.3 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 20.2 | no trial data cached |
| Incorrect product administration duration | 6 | 15.5 7.0–34.4ROR 15.8 · χ² 68 / p 9e-17 | 12.0 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=3 | no trial data cached |
| Product preparation error | 5 | 12.7 5.3–30.3ROR 12.8 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11 | 8.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic shock | 15 | 55.3 33.6–90.9ROR 57.4 · χ² 746 / p 1e-164 | 51.8 EB05 33.3 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 44.3 | no trial data cached |
| Haemorrhage intracranial | 10 | 35.0 19.0–64.6ROR 35.9 · χ² 298 / p 6e-67 | 33.0 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 28.2 | no trial data cached |
| Eosinophilia | 8 | 24.1 12.1–47.8ROR 24.5 · χ² 155 / p 8e-36 | 22.3 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 20.2 | no trial data cached |
| Ventricular fibrillation | 7 | 33.0 15.9–68.9ROR 33.6 · χ² 187 / p 9e-43 | 30.3 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 26.6 | no trial data cached |
| Incorrect product administration duration | 6 | 15.5 7.0–34.4ROR 15.8 · χ² 68 / p 9e-17 | 12.0 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=3 | no trial data cached |
| Product preparation error | 5 | 12.7 5.3–30.3ROR 12.8 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11 | 8.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
| Product complaint | 3 | 6.3 2.0–19.5ROR 6.4 · χ² 9 / p 0.002 | 3.7 EB05 1.4 · IC025 -0.2 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=3 | no trial data cached |
| Drug level decreased | 3 | 15.4 5.0–47.6ROR 15.5 · χ² 27 / p 9e-8 | 8.1 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 15.3 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Cangrelor?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cangrelor are cardiogenic shock, haemorrhage intracranial, eosinophilia, ventricular fibrillation. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Cangrelor have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Cangrelor has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Cangrelor causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 88b434fa-8891-4fd5-9d86-7ea64667c08f, effective 20251021; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"CANGRELOR") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 8 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.