← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cedazuridine and Decitabine side effects: what 875 FDA adverse event reports show

Cedazuridine And Decitabine · Inqovi · 22 reaction terms · 789 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nucleoside Metabolic Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Inqovi

openFDA label

Who reports

875 reports · 82% serious · 176 with death outcome · 42% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

INQOVI is a combination of decitabine, a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor, and cedazuridine, a cytidine deaminase inhibitor, indicated: For treatment of adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), including previously treated and untreated, de n.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Decitabine Decitabine is a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor. Decitabine is a white to off-white solid with the molecular formula of C 8 H 12 N 4 O 4 and a molecular weight of 228.21 daltons. Its.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 15 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 8Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 1
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 7 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cytopenia105212.4
177.4–254.4ROR 241.3 · χ² 21,702 / p <1e-300
202.8 EB05 172.3 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 141.6 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Transfusion69158.3
126.1–198.7ROR 171.7 · χ² 10,562 / p <1e-300
150.7 EB05 123.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 116.3 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Full blood count abnormal1534.1
20.7–56.4ROR 34.7 · χ² 450 / p 5e-100
32.8 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 27.6no trial data cached
Platelet count decreased10323.2
19.3–27.8ROR 26.2 · χ² 2,174 / p <1e-300
23.1 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.9 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Blood count abnormal1320.3
11.8–34.8ROR 20.6 · χ² 219 / p 6e-50
19.5 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 20.0no trial data cached
White blood cell count decreased8218.1
14.7–22.3ROR 19.9 · χ² 1,315 / p 3e-288
18.0 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.0 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Red blood cell count decreased2016.8
10.9–25.8ROR 17.1 · χ² 281 / p 2e-63
16.3 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 15.6 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration11916.1
13.7–19.1ROR 18.5 · χ² 1,688 / p <1e-300
16.1 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 22.5 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Full blood count decreased1214.3
8.1–25.0ROR 14.5 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
12.9 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Neutrophil count decreased2313.6
9.1–20.4ROR 14.0 · χ² 257 / p 5e-58
13.0 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.2 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia3713.4
9.8–18.4ROR 13.9 · χ² 413 / p 4e-92
13.1 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased5111.9
9.1–15.5ROR 12.6 · χ² 500 / p 6e-111
11.6 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.7 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Myelosuppression117.8
4.3–13.9ROR 7.8 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
6.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))437.6
5.7–10.2ROR 7.9 · χ² 242 / p 8e-55
7.1 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.7no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Inappropriate schedule of product administration11916.1
13.7–19.1ROR 18.5 · χ² 1,688 / p <1e-300
16.1 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 22.5 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Cytopenia105212.4
177.4–254.4ROR 241.3 · χ² 21,702 / p <1e-300
202.8 EB05 172.3 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 141.6 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Platelet count decreased10323.2
19.3–27.8ROR 26.2 · χ² 2,174 / p <1e-300
23.1 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.9 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
White blood cell count decreased8218.1
14.7–22.3ROR 19.9 · χ² 1,315 / p 3e-288
18.0 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.0 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Transfusion69158.3
126.1–198.7ROR 171.7 · χ² 10,562 / p <1e-300
150.7 EB05 123.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 116.3 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased5111.9
9.1–15.5ROR 12.6 · χ² 500 / p 6e-111
11.6 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.7 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))437.6
5.7–10.2ROR 7.9 · χ² 242 / p 8e-55
7.1 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia3713.4
9.8–18.4ROR 13.9 · χ² 413 / p 4e-92
13.1 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Neutrophil count decreased2313.6
9.1–20.4ROR 14.0 · χ² 257 / p 5e-58
13.0 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.2 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Red blood cell count decreased2016.8
10.9–25.8ROR 17.1 · χ² 281 / p 2e-63
16.3 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 15.6 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Full blood count abnormal1534.1
20.7–56.4ROR 34.7 · χ² 450 / p 5e-100
32.8 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 27.6no trial data cached
Blood count abnormal1320.3
11.8–34.8ROR 20.6 · χ² 219 / p 6e-50
19.5 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 20.0no trial data cached
Full blood count decreased1214.3
8.1–25.0ROR 14.5 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
12.9 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 9.7no trial data cached
Myelosuppression117.8
4.3–13.9ROR 7.8 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
6.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.0no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cedazuridine and Decitabine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cedazuridine and Decitabine are cytopenia, platelet count decreased, white blood cell count decreased, transfusion, haemoglobin decreased, pancytopenia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cedazuridine and Decitabine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Cedazuridine and Decitabine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Cedazuridine and Decitabine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.