← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cefdinir side effects: what 7,626 FDA adverse event reports show

Cefdinir · 678 reaction terms · 24,592 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Cephalosporin Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

7,626 reports · 63% serious · 579 with death outcome · 63% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of cefdinir and other antibacterial drugs, cefdinir should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Cefdinir for oral suspension, USP contains the active ingredient cefdinir USP, an extended-spectrum, semisynthetic cephalosporin, for oral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 8Likely indication confounding 8Reporting / coding artifact 1Not in label — unassessed 19
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 638 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
End stage renal disease14822.3
19.0–26.1ROR 22.7 · χ² 2,962 / p <1e-300
22.0 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.2no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease48517.5
16.1–19.1ROR 18.6 · χ² 7,507 / p <1e-300
17.4 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.2no trial data cached
Ear infection12312.8
10.7–15.3ROR 13.0 · χ² 1,321 / p 2e-289
12.7 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 13.5no trial data cached
Economic problem7012.5
9.9–15.8ROR 12.6 · χ² 729 / p 8e-161
12.3 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.2 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Sinusitis3619.7
8.8–10.7ROR 10.1 · χ² 2,807 / p <1e-300
9.6 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Renal injury1039.5
7.8–11.5ROR 9.6 · χ² 769 / p 1e-169
9.2 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached
Pharyngitis streptococcal358.9
6.4–12.4ROR 8.9 · χ² 237 / p 7e-54
8.3 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=21no trial data cached
Faeces discoloured708.9
7.0–11.2ROR 9.0 · χ² 482 / p 4e-107
8.6 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Seasonal allergy458.8
6.6–11.8ROR 8.8 · χ² 302 / p 6e-68
8.3 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Tubulointerstitial nephritis598.7
6.7–11.2ROR 8.7 · χ² 393 / p 1e-87
8.3 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.8no trial data cached
Renal tubular necrosis298.1
5.6–11.7ROR 8.2 · χ² 174 / p 6e-40
7.4 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Anhedonia778.0
6.4–10.0ROR 8.1 · χ² 465 / p 2e-103
7.7 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.8 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Renal failure (kidney failure)3627.5
6.7–8.2ROR 7.8 · χ² 2,025 / p <1e-300
7.4 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.8no trial data cached
Gastroenteritis viral436.5
4.9–8.8ROR 6.6 · χ² 196 / p 8e-45
6.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Nephropathy226.5
4.3–9.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 96 / p 6e-23
5.7 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Dermatitis contact245.8
3.9–8.7ROR 5.8 · χ² 91 / p 8e-22
5.3 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Eye infection235.6
3.8–8.5ROR 5.7 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
5.1 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=11 · ♀ 85% (drug 63%)no trial data cached
Osteopenia315.6
3.9–8.0ROR 5.6 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26
5.2 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Bronchitis1515.6
4.8–6.5ROR 5.7 · χ² 565 / p 3e-125
5.5 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Sinus disorder395.4
4.0–7.4ROR 5.4 · χ² 136 / p 1e-31
5.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 5.8 · ♀ 87% (drug 63%)no trial data cached
Atelectasis195.4
3.4–8.5ROR 5.4 · χ² 64 / p 8e-16
4.8 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Cystitis615.3
4.1–6.7ROR 5.3 · χ² 206 / p 6e-47
5.1 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Decreased activity205.1
3.3–8.0ROR 5.1 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
4.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Erythema multiforme175.0
3.1–8.1ROR 5.0 · χ² 51 / p 5e-13
4.5 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Respiratory tract congestion295.0
3.5–7.2ROR 5.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
4.7 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Impaired gastric emptying235.0
3.3–7.5ROR 5.0 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
4.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9 · ♀ 91% (drug 63%)no trial data cached
Stevens-johnson syndrome (severe blistering skin reaction)394.8
3.5–6.6ROR 4.8 · χ² 114 / p 6e-27
4.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Pharyngitis214.6
3.0–7.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 56 / p 3e-14
4.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Kidney infection324.5
3.2–6.3ROR 4.5 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
4.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3 · ♀ 84% (drug 63%)no trial data cached
Hospice care164.5
2.7–7.3ROR 4.5 · χ² 40 / p 2e-10
4.0 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Insurance issue244.4
3.0–6.6ROR 4.5 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
4.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Productive cough (cough with phlegm)764.4
3.5–5.5ROR 4.5 · χ² 198 / p 3e-45
4.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5302.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 385 / p 5e-86
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease48517.5
16.1–19.1ROR 18.6 · χ² 7,507 / p <1e-300
17.4 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.2no trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)4824.1
3.8–4.5ROR 4.3 · χ² 1,144 / p 4e-251
4.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Nausea4001.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 46 / p 6e-12
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Pain3741.7
1.5–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 103 / p 2e-24
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Renal failure (kidney failure)3627.5
6.7–8.2ROR 7.8 · χ² 2,025 / p <1e-300
7.4 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.8no trial data cached
Sinusitis3619.7
8.8–10.7ROR 10.1 · χ² 2,807 / p <1e-300
9.6 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Headache3321.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 49 / p 1e-12
1.5 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3271.6
1.4–1.8ROR 1.6 · χ² 73 / p 7e-18
1.6 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Death2900.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 2 / p 0.094
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.8no trial data cached
Rash2831.8
1.6–2.0ROR 1.8 · χ² 101 / p 5e-24
1.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cefdinir?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cefdinir are diarrhoea, chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, fatigue, nausea, pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cefdinir have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Cefdinir has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Cefdinir causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.