← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Ceftolozane and Tazobactam side effects: what 965 FDA adverse event reports show

Ceftolozane And Tazobactam · Zerbaxa · 23 reaction terms · 459 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Zerbaxa

openFDA label

Who reports

965 reports · 68% serious · 228 with death outcome · 38% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) is a combination of ceftolozane, a cephalosporin antibacterial, and tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, indicated for the treatment of the following infections caused by designated susceptible microorganisms in adult and pediatric patients (at least 32 weeks gestational age): Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI), used in combination with metronidazole.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) is an antibacterial combination product consisting of the cephalosporin antibacterial drug ceftolozane sulfate and the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam sodium for intravenous administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 18 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 5Not in label — unassessed 11
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 5 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug resistance3025.4
17.9–36.1ROR 26.2 · χ² 679 / p 5e-150
25.0 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Encephalopathy2320.4
13.6–30.6ROR 20.9 · χ² 406 / p 2e-90
20.1 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.4 · ♀ 67% (drug 38%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia919.6
10.2–37.5ROR 19.8 · χ² 141 / p 1e-32
18.1 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 16.6no trial data cached
Status epilepticus917.3
9.0–33.1ROR 17.4 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
15.6 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.7no trial data cached
Hepatocellular injury1116.8
9.3–30.3ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 2e-34
15.6 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.3no trial data cached
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure1114.6
8.1–26.3ROR 14.8 · χ² 126 / p 1e-29
13.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular1413.7
8.2–23.1ROR 13.9 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
12.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Septic shock2512.6
8.5–18.5ROR 12.9 · χ² 255 / p 9e-58
12.0 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication12811.4
9.7–13.4ROR 13.0 · χ² 1,216 / p 8e-267
11.3 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
No adverse event8910.9
8.9–13.3ROR 11.9 · χ² 798 / p 9e-176
10.7 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4 · ♀ 60% (drug 38%)no trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)2610.1
6.9–14.8ROR 10.4 · χ² 206 / p 6e-47
9.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · ♀ 0% (drug 38%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Incorrect product administration duration88.6
4.3–17.1ROR 8.6 · χ² 46 / p 5e-12
6.3 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=5no trial data cached
Lymphopenia57.7
3.2–18.5ROR 7.8 · χ² 23 / p 8e-7
5.0 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Eosinophilia67.5
3.4–16.6ROR 7.5 · χ² 27 / p 8e-8
5.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error106.5
3.5–12.0ROR 6.5 · χ² 41 / p 7e-11
5.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Drug effective for unapproved indication86.0
3.0–11.9ROR 6.0 · χ² 28 / p 5e-8
4.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Product storage error153.8
2.3–6.2ROR 3.8 · χ² 28 / p 6e-8
3.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product use in unapproved indication12811.4
9.7–13.4ROR 13.0 · χ² 1,216 / p 8e-267
11.3 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
No adverse event8910.9
8.9–13.3ROR 11.9 · χ² 798 / p 9e-176
10.7 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4 · ♀ 60% (drug 38%)no trial data cached
Drug resistance3025.4
17.9–36.1ROR 26.2 · χ² 679 / p 5e-150
25.0 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.6no trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)2610.1
6.9–14.8ROR 10.4 · χ² 206 / p 6e-47
9.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · ♀ 0% (drug 38%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Septic shock2512.6
8.5–18.5ROR 12.9 · χ² 255 / p 9e-58
12.0 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Encephalopathy2320.4
13.6–30.6ROR 20.9 · χ² 406 / p 2e-90
20.1 EB05 14.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.4 · ♀ 67% (drug 38%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Product storage error153.8
2.3–6.2ROR 3.8 · χ² 28 / p 6e-8
3.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular1413.7
8.2–23.1ROR 13.9 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
12.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure1114.6
8.1–26.3ROR 14.8 · χ² 126 / p 1e-29
13.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Hepatocellular injury1116.8
9.3–30.3ROR 17.0 · χ² 148 / p 2e-34
15.6 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.3no trial data cached
Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error106.5
3.5–12.0ROR 6.5 · χ² 41 / p 7e-11
5.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Status epilepticus917.3
9.0–33.1ROR 17.4 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
15.6 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.7no trial data cached
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia919.6
10.2–37.5ROR 19.8 · χ² 141 / p 1e-32
18.1 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 16.6no trial data cached
Drug effective for unapproved indication86.0
3.0–11.9ROR 6.0 · χ² 28 / p 5e-8
4.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Ceftolozane and Tazobactam?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Ceftolozane and Tazobactam are pancytopenia, septic shock, encephalopathy, agranulocytosis, rash maculo-papular, generalised tonic-clonic seizure. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Ceftolozane and Tazobactam have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Ceftolozane and Tazobactam has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Ceftolozane and Tazobactam causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.