← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cerliponase Alfa side effects: what 526 FDA adverse event reports show

Cerliponase Alfa · Brineura · 15 reaction terms · 239 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Hydrolytic lysosomal n-terminal tripeptidyl peptidase

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Brineura

openFDA label

Who reports

526 reports · 72% serious · 24 with death outcome · 45% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

BRINEURA is indicated to slow the loss of ambulation in pediatric patients with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2 disease), also known as tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1) deficiency. BRINEURA is a hydrolytic lysosomal N-terminal tripeptidyl pep.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Cerliponase alfa is a purified human enzyme produced by recombinant DNA technology in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line. The active substance is a recombinant human tripeptidyl peptidase-1 (rhTPP1), a lysosomal exopeptidase.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS INCLUDING ANAPHYLAXIS Patients treated with enzyme replacement therapies have experienced life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis has occurred during the early course of enzyme replacement therapy and after extended duration of therapy.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 13 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 1Reporting / coding artifact 6Not in label — unassessed 2
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device related infection3077.6
54.8–110.0ROR 82.3 · χ² 2,191 / p <1e-300
74.0 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 63.4no trial data cached
Device occlusion1645.9
28.3–74.4ROR 47.3 · χ² 658 / p 2e-145
43.6 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=13no trial data cached
Myoclonus1343.5
25.4–74.4ROR 44.6 · χ² 498 / p 1e-110
41.1 EB05 25.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.6no trial data cached
Dystonia1530.7
18.7–50.6ROR 31.6 · χ² 402 / p 8e-90
29.7 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.2no trial data cached
Device leakage2826.4
18.4–37.8ROR 27.8 · χ² 660 / p 1e-145
26.0 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Seizure7526.1
21.1–32.1ROR 30.2 · χ² 1,792 / p <1e-300
25.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.7 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Status epilepticus724.7
11.8–51.5ROR 25.0 · χ² 136 / p 9e-32
22.5 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.7no trial data cached
Cyanosis (blue skin from low oxygen)717.7
8.5–37.0ROR 17.9 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
15.1 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.0no trial data cached
Needle issue811.2
5.6–22.2ROR 11.3 · χ² 64 / p 6e-16
8.5 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=1no trial data cached
Device dislocation87.3
3.7–14.6ROR 7.4 · χ² 38 / p 4e-10
5.5 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Device breakage66.1
2.7–13.5ROR 6.1 · χ² 21 / p 3e-6
4.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.2no trial data cached
Device issue115.0
2.8–9.0ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 9e-9
4.2 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Seizure7526.1
21.1–32.1ROR 30.2 · χ² 1,792 / p <1e-300
25.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.7 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Device related infection3077.6
54.8–110.0ROR 82.3 · χ² 2,191 / p <1e-300
74.0 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 63.4no trial data cached
Device leakage2826.4
18.4–37.8ROR 27.8 · χ² 660 / p 1e-145
26.0 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Device occlusion1645.9
28.3–74.4ROR 47.3 · χ² 658 / p 2e-145
43.6 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=13no trial data cached
Dystonia1530.7
18.7–50.6ROR 31.6 · χ² 402 / p 8e-90
29.7 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.2no trial data cached
Myoclonus1343.5
25.4–74.4ROR 44.6 · χ² 498 / p 1e-110
41.1 EB05 25.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.6no trial data cached
Device issue115.0
2.8–9.0ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 9e-9
4.2 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.1no trial data cached
Device dislocation87.3
3.7–14.6ROR 7.4 · χ² 38 / p 4e-10
5.5 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Needle issue811.2
5.6–22.2ROR 11.3 · χ² 64 / p 6e-16
8.5 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=1no trial data cached
Cyanosis (blue skin from low oxygen)717.7
8.5–37.0ROR 17.9 · χ² 94 / p 1e-22
15.1 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.0no trial data cached
Status epilepticus724.7
11.8–51.5ROR 25.0 · χ² 136 / p 9e-32
22.5 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 19.7no trial data cached
Device breakage66.1
2.7–13.5ROR 6.1 · χ² 21 / p 3e-6
4.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.2no trial data cached
Hypotonia415.9
6.0–42.2ROR 16.0 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
10.1 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (darbepoetin alfa) ↔ Mortality / cardiovascular risk.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cerliponase Alfa?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cerliponase Alfa are seizure, dystonia, myoclonus, needle issue, generalised tonic-clonic seizure, cyanosis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cerliponase Alfa have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS INCLUDING ANAPHYLAXIS Patients treated with enzyme replacement therapies have experienced life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis has occurred during the early course of enzyme replacement therapy and after extended duration of therapy.

Do FAERS signals prove that Cerliponase Alfa causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.