Cetirizine side effects: what 441 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Not stated in label
Brand names
Cetirizine Hydrochloride
Who reports
441 reports · 46% serious · 25 with death outcome · 72% female
Used for
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: Cetirizine hydrochloride is indicated for the relief of symptoms associated with perennial allergic rhinitis due to allergens such as dust mites, animal dander and molds in children 6 to 23 months of age. Symptoms treated effectively include sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal discharge, nasal pruritus, ocular pruritus, and tearing.
What it is
DESCRIPTION Cetirizine hydrochloride is an orally active and selective H 1 -receptor antagonist.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 7 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 0 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal allergy | 13 | 43.6 25.5–74.5ROR 44.9 · χ² 500 / p 6e-111 | 41.2 EB05 25.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis contact | 8 | 33.4 16.8–66.3ROR 34.0 · χ² 220 / p 5e-50 | 31.0 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=7 | no trial data cached |
| Infusion site pain | 7 | 26.0 12.4–54.1ROR 26.4 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33 | 23.7 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=4 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 6 | 19.1 8.6–42.3ROR 19.4 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20 | 15.9 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 41.1 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission in error | 7 | 12.3 5.9–25.7ROR 12.5 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15 | 9.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 17.4 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | 9 | 6.2 3.2–11.8ROR 6.3 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9 | 4.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.1 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis atopic | 5 | 4.7 2.0–11.3ROR 4.8 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4 | 3.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.3 | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seasonal allergy | 13 | 43.6 25.5–74.5ROR 44.9 · χ² 500 / p 6e-111 | 41.2 EB05 25.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=10 | no trial data cached |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | 9 | 6.2 3.2–11.8ROR 6.3 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9 | 4.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.1 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis contact | 8 | 33.4 16.8–66.3ROR 34.0 · χ² 220 / p 5e-50 | 31.0 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=7 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission in error | 7 | 12.3 5.9–25.7ROR 12.5 · χ² 62 / p 2e-15 | 9.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 17.4 | no trial data cached |
| Infusion site pain | 7 | 26.0 12.4–54.1ROR 26.4 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33 | 23.7 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=4 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 6 | 19.1 8.6–42.3ROR 19.4 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20 | 15.9 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 41.1 | no trial data cached |
| Dermatitis atopic | 5 | 4.7 2.0–11.3ROR 4.8 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4 | 3.5 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.3 | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Cetirizine?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cetirizine are seasonal allergy, multiple sclerosis relapse, dermatitis contact, infusion site pain, insurance issue, dermatitis atopic. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Cetirizine have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Cetirizine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Cetirizine causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 365cbabe-535b-4c34-852b-6cd63782e3e5, effective 20250501; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"CETIRIZINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 7 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.