← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cetrorelix side effects: what 617 FDA adverse event reports show

Cetrorelix Acetate · 22 reaction terms · 238 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Cetrorelix Acetate (Cetrorelix Acetate)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

617 reports · 71% serious · 7 with death outcome · 99% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Cetrorelix acetate for injection is indicated for the inhibition of premature LH surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Cetrorelix acetate for injection is a synthetic decapeptide with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonistic activity. Cetrorelix acetate is an analog of native GnRH with substitutions of amino acids at positions 1, 2, 3, 6, and 10.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 17 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 2Not in label — unassessed 9
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 5 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug level decreased1756.6
35.4–90.4ROR 58.2 · χ² 872 / p 5e-192
53.3 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 57.0no trial data cached
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure1837.4
23.7–59.0ROR 38.5 · χ² 602 / p 3e-133
36.1 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.9no trial data cached
Ascites2832.4
22.5–46.5ROR 33.9 · χ² 821 / p 8e-181
31.7 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.8 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Caesarean section823.1
11.6–46.1ROR 23.4 · χ² 148 / p 2e-34
21.4 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.4no trial data cached
Pregnancy1016.8
9.1–31.1ROR 17.1 · χ² 133 / p 4e-31
15.3 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.1no trial data cached
Injection site urticaria1115.4
8.6–27.7ROR 15.7 · χ² 134 / p 2e-31
14.0 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Pelvic pain815.0
7.5–29.8ROR 15.1 · χ² 91 / p 8e-22
12.6 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Drug exposure during pregnancy1110.8
6.0–19.5ROR 11.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
8.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Mania510.3
4.3–24.8ROR 10.4 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9
6.6 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4no trial data cached
Injection site rash910.1
5.3–19.3ROR 10.2 · χ² 65 / p 4e-16
7.8 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Injury associated with device58.4
3.5–20.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
5.4 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Needle issue67.1
3.2–15.8ROR 7.2 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
5.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Premature baby66.8
3.0–15.0ROR 6.8 · χ² 24 / p 5e-7
4.7 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 5.6no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Ascites2832.4
22.5–46.5ROR 33.9 · χ² 821 / p 8e-181
31.7 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.8 · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure1837.4
23.7–59.0ROR 38.5 · χ² 602 / p 3e-133
36.1 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.9no trial data cached
Drug level decreased1756.6
35.4–90.4ROR 58.2 · χ² 872 / p 5e-192
53.3 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 57.0no trial data cached
Drug exposure during pregnancy1110.8
6.0–19.5ROR 11.0 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
8.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Injection site urticaria1115.4
8.6–27.7ROR 15.7 · χ² 134 / p 2e-31
14.0 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Pregnancy1016.8
9.1–31.1ROR 17.1 · χ² 133 / p 4e-31
15.3 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.1no trial data cached
Injection site rash910.1
5.3–19.3ROR 10.2 · χ² 65 / p 4e-16
7.8 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Pelvic pain815.0
7.5–29.8ROR 15.1 · χ² 91 / p 8e-22
12.6 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.7no trial data cached
Caesarean section823.1
11.6–46.1ROR 23.4 · χ² 148 / p 2e-34
21.4 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.4no trial data cached
Premature baby66.8
3.0–15.0ROR 6.8 · χ² 24 / p 5e-7
4.7 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Needle issue67.1
3.2–15.8ROR 7.2 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
5.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Medroxyprogesterone acetate ↔ Meningioma.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cetrorelix?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cetrorelix are abortion spontaneous, ascites, generalised tonic-clonic seizure, injection site erythema, injection site pruritus, injection site urticaria. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cetrorelix have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Cetrorelix has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Cetrorelix causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.