← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Chlordiazepoxide and Clidinium side effects: what 1,919 FDA adverse event reports show

Chlordiazepoxide Hydrochloride And Clidinium Bromide · 126 reaction terms · 1,207 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Chlordiazepoxide Hydrochloride And Clidinium Bromide (Chlordiazepoxide Hydrochloride And Clidinium Bromide)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

1,919 reports · 57% serious · 68 with death outcome · 81% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride and clidinium bromide capsules is indicated to control emotional and somatic factors in gastrointestinal disorders. Chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride and clidinium bromide capsules may also be used as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of peptic ulcer and in the treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome (irritable colon, spastic colon, mucous colitis) and acute enterocolitis.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION: Chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride and clidinium bromide capsules, USP is a fixed-combination of chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride, a benzodiazepine, and clidinium bromide, an anticholinergic.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

RISKS FROM CONCOMITANT USE WITH OPIOIDS; ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION; and DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL REACTIONS Concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death. Reserve concomitant prescribing of these drugs in patients for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 38 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 5Not in label — unassessed 31
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 88 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Irritable bowel syndrome3819.5
14.2–26.7ROR 19.8 · χ² 646 / p 7e-143
19.2 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 16.5 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Gallbladder disorder2414.7
9.8–21.8ROR 14.8 · χ² 292 / p 1e-65
14.2 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.4no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal pain1212.0
6.8–21.1ROR 12.0 · χ² 110 / p 5e-26
10.3 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc degeneration1011.7
6.3–21.8ROR 11.8 · χ² 88 / p 4e-21
9.7 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.3no trial data cached
Diverticulitis2610.3
7.0–15.1ROR 10.4 · χ² 209 / p 1e-47
9.5 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1no trial data cached
Bursitis1110.0
5.5–18.0ROR 10.0 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
8.1 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.9no trial data cached
Cholecystectomy109.6
5.2–17.9ROR 9.7 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
7.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.1no trial data cached
Hiatus hernia119.3
5.1–16.7ROR 9.3 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18
7.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Oral candidiasis (oral thrush)119.2
5.1–16.7ROR 9.3 · χ² 73 / p 7e-18
7.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.8no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc protrusion168.0
4.9–13.0ROR 8.0 · χ² 91 / p 8e-22
6.8 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Haemorrhoids147.8
4.6–13.2ROR 7.9 · χ² 77 / p 1e-18
6.5 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Fibromyalgia177.6
4.8–12.3ROR 7.7 · χ² 92 / p 5e-22
6.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4no trial data cached
Pharmaceutical product complaint187.5
4.7–11.8ROR 7.5 · χ² 95 / p 1e-22
6.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Restless legs syndrome127.2
4.1–12.7ROR 7.2 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
5.9 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.0no trial data cached
Economic problem107.1
3.8–13.2ROR 7.1 · χ² 46 / p 5e-12
5.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Gastritis166.6
4.1–10.8ROR 6.7 · χ² 71 / p 2e-17
5.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Activities of daily living impaired126.5
3.7–11.5ROR 6.6 · χ² 51 / p 5e-13
5.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Cholelithiasis196.3
4.0–9.9ROR 6.4 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
5.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Dysuria (painful urination)216.2
4.1–9.5ROR 6.3 · χ² 87 / p 5e-21
5.5 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Rectal haemorrhage235.8
3.9–8.8ROR 5.9 · χ² 87 / p 5e-21
5.3 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Kidney infection105.6
3.0–10.3ROR 5.6 · χ² 33 / p 4e-9
4.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Flatulence (gas)265.0
3.4–7.4ROR 5.1 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
4.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Pain in jaw135.0
2.9–8.6ROR 5.0 · χ² 38 / p 4e-10
4.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0no trial data cached
Injury324.9
3.5–7.0ROR 5.0 · χ² 97 / p 3e-23
4.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached
Anhedonia114.5
2.5–8.2ROR 4.6 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements114.5
2.5–8.1ROR 4.5 · χ² 26 / p 1e-7
3.8 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Abasia104.4
2.3–8.1ROR 4.4 · χ² 23 / p 1e-6
3.7 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Abnormal dreams103.9
2.1–7.3ROR 3.9 · χ² 19 / p 6e-6
3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Nervousness183.7
2.4–5.9ROR 3.8 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
3.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Injection site haemorrhage273.7
2.6–5.4ROR 3.8 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
3.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Abnormal behaviour133.6
2.1–6.1ROR 3.6 · χ² 21 / p 2e-6
3.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Drug effect incomplete103.0
1.6–5.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Wrong technique in drug usage process103.0
1.6–5.5ROR 3.0 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Emotional distress272.4
1.7–3.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 21 / p 2e-6
2.4 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Drug effect decreased122.4
1.4–4.2ROR 2.4 · χ² 8 / p 0.002
2.3 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus142.3
1.4–3.9ROR 2.3 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.2 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Product substitution issue122.3
1.3–4.0ROR 2.3 · χ² 7 / p 0.003
2.2 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)232.0
1.4–3.1ROR 2.0 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.0 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Injection site pain (pain where injected)531.9
1.5–2.5ROR 1.9 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
1.9 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Irritable bowel syndrome3819.5
14.2–26.7ROR 19.8 · χ² 646 / p 7e-143
19.2 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 16.5 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Injury324.9
3.5–7.0ROR 5.0 · χ² 97 / p 3e-23
4.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached
Emotional distress272.4
1.7–3.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 21 / p 2e-6
2.4 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.6Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 2.5no trial data cached
Injection site haemorrhage273.7
2.6–5.4ROR 3.8 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
3.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Flatulence (gas)265.0
3.4–7.4ROR 5.1 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
4.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Diverticulitis2610.3
7.0–15.1ROR 10.4 · χ² 209 / p 1e-47
9.5 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.1no trial data cached
Drug dose omission251.6
1.1–2.4ROR 1.6 · χ² 5 / p 0.010
1.6 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.0Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Gallbladder disorder2414.7
9.8–21.8ROR 14.8 · χ² 292 / p 1e-65
14.2 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.4no trial data cached
Injection site erythema (redness where injected)232.0
1.4–3.1ROR 2.0 · χ² 11 / p 4e-4
2.0 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Rectal haemorrhage235.8
3.9–8.8ROR 5.9 · χ² 87 / p 5e-21
5.3 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Dysuria (painful urination)216.2
4.1–9.5ROR 6.3 · χ² 87 / p 5e-21
5.5 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.7no trial data cached
Cholelithiasis196.3
4.0–9.9ROR 6.4 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
5.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Nervousness183.7
2.4–5.9ROR 3.8 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
3.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Pharmaceutical product complaint187.5
4.7–11.8ROR 7.5 · χ² 95 / p 1e-22
6.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Chlordiazepoxide and Clidinium?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Chlordiazepoxide and Clidinium are injection site pain, irritable bowel syndrome, injury, emotional distress, injection site haemorrhage, flatulence. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Chlordiazepoxide and Clidinium have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISKS FROM CONCOMITANT USE WITH OPIOIDS; ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION; and DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL REACTIONS Concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death. Reserve concomitant prescribing of these drugs in patients for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate.

Do FAERS signals prove that Chlordiazepoxide and Clidinium causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.