← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride side effects: what 943 FDA adverse event reports show

Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride · 71 reaction terms · 1,119 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

943 reports · 89% serious · 138 with death outcome · 46% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

For the management of manifestations of psychotic disorders. For the treatment of schizophrenia. To control nausea and vomiting. For relief of restlessness and apprehension before surgery. For acute intermittent porphyria. As an adjunct in the treatment of tetanus. To control the manifestations of the manic type of manic-depressive illness. For relief of intractable hiccups.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Chlorpromazine hydrochloride, USP, a dimethylamine derivative of phenothiazine, has a chemical formula of 2-chloro-10-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl] phenothiazine monohydrochloride. It is available in tablets for oral administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen place.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 25
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 31 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome3769.3
50.5–95.1ROR 72.1 · χ² 2,417 / p <1e-300
66.8 EB05 50.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 44.9 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Myocarditis2753.1
36.6–77.0ROR 54.6 · χ² 1,326 / p 2e-290
51.2 EB05 36.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 34.3 · ♀ 17% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Delusion2738.8
26.7–56.3ROR 39.9 · χ² 956 / p 4e-210
37.8 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.2no trial data cached
Schizophrenia1832.9
20.8–52.0ROR 33.5 · χ² 525 / p 2e-116
31.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 22.0no trial data cached
Brain injury1328.8
16.8–49.4ROR 29.2 · χ² 321 / p 4e-72
27.7 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.9no trial data cached
Hallucination, auditory1926.5
17.0–41.4ROR 27.1 · χ² 442 / p 2e-98
25.9 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.8no trial data cached
Sopor1423.3
13.8–39.2ROR 23.6 · χ² 277 / p 2e-62
22.5 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.1no trial data cached
Intentional self-injury2022.0
14.3–34.0ROR 22.5 · χ² 381 / p 4e-85
21.6 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 14.4no trial data cached
Hypothermia1021.9
11.8–40.6ROR 22.1 · χ² 179 / p 4e-41
20.7 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.4no trial data cached
Psychotic disorder2921.8
15.3–31.2ROR 22.5 · χ² 556 / p 3e-123
21.5 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Altered state of consciousness2020.6
13.4–31.8ROR 21.1 · χ² 354 / p 3e-79
20.2 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.5 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Premature baby2719.9
13.7–28.8ROR 20.4 · χ² 466 / p 1e-103
19.6 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached
Orthostatic hypotension (dizziness on standing)1417.8
10.6–30.0ROR 18.1 · χ² 206 / p 5e-47
17.1 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached
Sinus tachycardia1117.3
9.6–31.1ROR 17.4 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
16.0 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.4no trial data cached
Drug resistance1916.4
10.5–25.7ROR 16.8 · χ² 260 / p 7e-59
15.9 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke1214.9
8.5–26.2ROR 15.1 · χ² 142 / p 4e-33
13.6 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6no trial data cached
Mania1114.9
8.3–26.8ROR 15.0 · χ² 129 / p 4e-30
13.4 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.9no trial data cached
Paranoia1114.1
7.8–25.4ROR 14.3 · χ² 121 / p 2e-28
12.5 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5no trial data cached
Premature delivery1013.9
7.5–25.7ROR 14.0 · χ² 107 / p 2e-25
12.0 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt prolonged2213.6
9.0–20.5ROR 13.9 · χ² 244 / p 2e-55
13.0 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5 · ♀ 81% (drug 46%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Peritonitis1212.9
7.3–22.6ROR 13.0 · χ² 120 / p 3e-28
11.3 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Cerebral infarction1412.7
7.6–21.4ROR 12.9 · χ² 140 / p 1e-32
11.4 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Toxicity to various agents9512.6
10.4–15.2ROR 13.9 · χ² 1,009 / p 1e-221
12.5 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0 · ♀ 68% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc protrusion1212.2
6.9–21.3ROR 12.3 · χ² 112 / p 2e-26
10.5 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Hallucination, visual1111.6
6.5–21.0ROR 11.8 · χ² 97 / p 4e-23
9.8 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.6no trial data cached
Rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown)2111.2
7.3–17.1ROR 11.4 · χ² 186 / p 2e-42
10.3 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Sedation1311.1
6.5–19.0ROR 11.2 · χ² 109 / p 7e-26
9.5 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9no trial data cached
Aggression2310.2
6.8–15.3ROR 10.4 · χ² 182 / p 9e-42
9.3 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 7.5 · ♀ 70% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Cardio-respiratory arrest1910.0
6.4–15.7ROR 10.2 · χ² 146 / p 7e-34
8.9 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.5no trial data cached
Drug abuse369.6
6.9–13.2ROR 9.9 · χ² 268 / p 1e-60
9.0 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.3 · ♀ 74% (drug 46%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Cognitive disorder209.6
6.2–14.7ROR 9.7 · χ² 145 / p 1e-33
8.5 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Tardive dyskinesia (persistent involuntary movements)129.4
5.3–16.4ROR 9.5 · χ² 82 / p 9e-20
7.7 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Maternal exposure during pregnancy348.6
6.2–11.9ROR 8.8 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
7.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.6 · ♀ 85% (drug 46%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased118.4
4.6–15.0ROR 8.4 · χ² 64 / p 6e-16
6.7 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy308.2
5.8–11.7ROR 8.4 · χ² 183 / p 5e-42
7.5 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4 · ♀ 19% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Suicide attempt217.7
5.0–11.7ROR 7.8 · χ² 116 / p 3e-27
6.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Intentional overdose217.3
4.8–11.2ROR 7.5 · χ² 109 / p 1e-25
6.5 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.9 · ♀ 90% (drug 46%)no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Toxicity to various agents9512.6
10.4–15.2ROR 13.9 · χ² 1,009 / p 1e-221
12.5 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0 · ♀ 68% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Overdose515.2
4.0–6.8ROR 5.5 · χ² 172 / p 1e-39
5.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.2 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome3769.3
50.5–95.1ROR 72.1 · χ² 2,417 / p <1e-300
66.8 EB05 50.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 44.9 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug abuse369.6
6.9–13.2ROR 9.9 · χ² 268 / p 1e-60
9.0 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.3 · ♀ 74% (drug 46%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Maternal exposure during pregnancy348.6
6.2–11.9ROR 8.8 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
7.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.6 · ♀ 85% (drug 46%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Foetal exposure during pregnancy308.2
5.8–11.7ROR 8.4 · χ² 183 / p 5e-42
7.5 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.4 · ♀ 19% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Psychotic disorder2921.8
15.3–31.2ROR 22.5 · χ² 556 / p 3e-123
21.5 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.8no trial data cached
Premature baby2719.9
13.7–28.8ROR 20.4 · χ² 466 / p 1e-103
19.6 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.1no trial data cached
Delusion2738.8
26.7–56.3ROR 39.9 · χ² 956 / p 4e-210
37.8 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.2no trial data cached
Myocarditis2753.1
36.6–77.0ROR 54.6 · χ² 1,326 / p 2e-290
51.2 EB05 36.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 34.3 · ♀ 17% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Completed suicide (death by suicide)236.1
4.1–9.1ROR 6.2 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
5.5 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 3.9 · ♀ 70% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Aggression2310.2
6.8–15.3ROR 10.4 · χ² 182 / p 9e-42
9.3 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 7.5 · ♀ 70% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Suicidal ideation (thoughts of suicide)225.3
3.5–8.1ROR 5.4 · χ² 73 / p 5e-18
4.8 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6no trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt prolonged2213.6
9.0–20.5ROR 13.9 · χ² 244 / p 2e-55
13.0 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5 · ♀ 81% (drug 46%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional overdose217.3
4.8–11.2ROR 7.5 · χ² 109 / p 1e-25
6.5 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.9 · ♀ 90% (drug 46%)no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Chlorpromazine ↔ Neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Chlorpromazine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Chlorpromazine are toxicity to various agents, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, psychotic disorder, premature baby, delusion, myocarditis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Chlorpromazine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia-Related Psychosis Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of seventeen place.

Do FAERS signals prove that Chlorpromazine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.