← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cidofovir side effects: what 1,405 FDA adverse event reports show

Cidofovir Anhydrous · 55 reaction terms · 1,430 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Cidofovir Anhydrous (Cidofovir)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

1,405 reports · 94% serious · 394 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Cidofovir is indicated for the treatment of CMV retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CIDOFOVIR INJECTION HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR TREATMENT OF OTHER CMV INFECTIONS (SUCH AS PNEUMONITIS OR GASTROENTERITIS), CONGENITAL OR NEONATAL CMV DISEASE, OR CMV DISEASE IN NON-HIV-INFECTED INDIVIDUALS.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

RENAL IMPAIRMENT IS THE MAJOR TOXICITY OF CIDOFOVIR INJECTION. CASES OF ACUTE RENAL FAILURE RESULTING IN DIALYSIS AND/OR CONTRIBUTING TO DEATH HAVE OCCURRED WITH AS FEW AS ONE OR TWO DOSES OF CIDOFOVIR INJECTION. TO .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 39 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 3Labeled adverse reaction 8Labeled (related wording) 7Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 3Not in label — unassessed 16
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 16 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug resistance15087.7
75.3–102.0ROR 98.0 · χ² 12,705 / p <1e-300
86.2 EB05 75.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 56.3 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Nephropathy toxic6587.6
69.0–111.2ROR 91.8 · χ² 5,449 / p <1e-300
85.0 EB05 69.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 54.5 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus infection8980.3
65.6–98.2ROR 85.6 · χ² 6,857 / p <1e-300
78.5 EB05 65.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 49.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Thrombotic microangiopathy2538.6
26.2–57.0ROR 39.3 · χ² 877 / p 5e-193
37.5 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.6 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Bacteraemia2936.9
25.7–52.9ROR 37.6 · χ² 974 / p 4e-214
36.0 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.7no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication7921.2
17.1–26.2ROR 22.4 · χ² 1,501 / p <1e-300
21.1 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 28.2 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome1320.4
11.9–35.1ROR 20.6 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
19.6 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.5no trial data cached
Nephropathy1219.1
10.9–33.6ROR 19.3 · χ² 188 / p 4e-43
18.2 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.4no trial data cached
Lymphopenia1718.1
11.3–29.0ROR 18.3 · χ² 257 / p 4e-58
17.5 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.9no trial data cached
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia1217.9
10.2–31.5ROR 18.1 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40
16.9 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Renal impairment9517.0
14.0–20.6ROR 18.1 · χ² 1,415 / p <1e-300
16.9 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 10.7 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Uveitis1415.5
9.2–26.1ROR 15.6 · χ² 175 / p 2e-40
14.5 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.1no trial data cached
Acute hepatic failure1415.4
9.1–25.9ROR 15.5 · χ² 174 / p 5e-40
14.4 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4no trial data cached
Metabolic acidosis3014.2
9.9–20.2ROR 14.4 · χ² 354 / p 3e-79
13.8 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.7 · ♀ 87% (drug 47%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)14013.7
11.7–16.1ROR 15.1 · χ² 1,650 / p <1e-300
13.7 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 8.4 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Haematuria (blood in urine)3113.5
9.5–19.1ROR 13.8 · χ² 347 / p 1e-77
13.1 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Electrolyte imbalance1013.0
7.0–24.1ROR 13.1 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
11.0 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Encephalopathy2112.8
8.4–19.6ROR 13.0 · χ² 217 / p 2e-49
12.1 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9 · ♀ 19% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Cytopenia1012.5
6.7–23.2ROR 12.6 · χ² 95 / p 1e-22
10.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)4411.8
8.8–15.8ROR 12.1 · χ² 425 / p 1e-94
11.4 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Coagulopathy1210.8
6.1–18.9ROR 10.9 · χ² 97 / p 4e-23
9.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Hemiparesis1210.5
6.0–18.5ROR 10.6 · χ² 94 / p 2e-22
8.8 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Hepatic failure209.9
6.4–15.3ROR 10.0 · χ² 151 / p 5e-35
8.8 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Septic shock258.6
5.9–12.7ROR 8.8 · χ² 162 / p 3e-37
7.8 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Multi-organ failure108.5
4.6–15.8ROR 8.6 · χ² 59 / p 8e-15
6.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.2no trial data cached
Pneumonitis158.3
5.0–13.7ROR 8.4 · χ² 89 / p 2e-21
7.0 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Hepatitis (liver inflammation)148.2
4.8–13.8ROR 8.2 · χ² 81 / p 1e-19
6.8 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Myelosuppression167.0
4.3–11.4ROR 7.1 · χ² 77 / p 9e-19
6.0 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia317.0
4.9–9.9ROR 7.1 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
6.4 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 4.3 · ♀ 70% (drug 47%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Treatment failure356.4
4.6–8.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
5.9 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Hepatic function abnormal145.6
3.3–9.5ROR 5.7 · χ² 49 / p 1e-12
4.8 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage315.5
3.9–7.8ROR 5.6 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26
5.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.4 · ♀ 72% (drug 47%)no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug resistance15087.7
75.3–102.0ROR 98.0 · χ² 12,705 / p <1e-300
86.2 EB05 75.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 56.3 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)14013.7
11.7–16.1ROR 15.1 · χ² 1,650 / p <1e-300
13.7 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 8.4 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Renal impairment9517.0
14.0–20.6ROR 18.1 · χ² 1,415 / p <1e-300
16.9 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 10.7 · 99% clinicianno trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus infection8980.3
65.6–98.2ROR 85.6 · χ² 6,857 / p <1e-300
78.5 EB05 65.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 49.4 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication7921.2
17.1–26.2ROR 22.4 · χ² 1,501 / p <1e-300
21.1 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 28.2 · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Nephropathy toxic6587.6
69.0–111.2ROR 91.8 · χ² 5,449 / p <1e-300
85.0 EB05 69.0 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 54.5 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)4411.8
8.8–15.8ROR 12.1 · χ² 425 / p 1e-94
11.4 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Treatment failure356.4
4.6–8.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
5.9 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.5no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage315.5
3.9–7.8ROR 5.6 · χ² 110 / p 4e-26
5.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.4 · ♀ 72% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia317.0
4.9–9.9ROR 7.1 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
6.4 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 4.3 · ♀ 70% (drug 47%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Haematuria (blood in urine)3113.5
9.5–19.1ROR 13.8 · χ² 347 / p 1e-77
13.1 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Metabolic acidosis3014.2
9.9–20.2ROR 14.4 · χ² 354 / p 3e-79
13.8 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.7 · ♀ 87% (drug 47%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cidofovir?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cidofovir are acute kidney injury, renal impairment, cytomegalovirus infection, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, nephropathy toxic, respiratory failure. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cidofovir have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RENAL IMPAIRMENT IS THE MAJOR TOXICITY OF CIDOFOVIR INJECTION. CASES OF ACUTE RENAL FAILURE RESULTING IN DIALYSIS AND/OR CONTRIBUTING TO DEATH HAVE OCCURRED WITH AS FEW AS ONE OR TWO DOSES OF CIDOFOVIR INJECTION. TO .

Do FAERS signals prove that Cidofovir causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.