Clascoterone side effects: what 1,418 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Brand names
Winlevi
Who reports
1,418 reports · 5% serious · 0 with death outcome · 90% female
Used for
WINLEVI (clascoterone) cream is an androgen receptor inhibitor indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years of age and older. WINLEVI (clascoterone) cream is an androgen receptor inhibitor indicated for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years of age and older. ( 1 )
What it is
WINLEVI (clascoterone) cream contains clascoterone, an androgen receptor inhibitor, in a cream base for topical dermatologic use. WINLEVI cream is a white to almost white cream.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 15 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 6 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product use complaint | 286 | 278.0 250.4–308.7ROR 348.0 · χ² 77,251 / p <1e-300 | 268.0 EB05 242.9 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1 · 88% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Poor quality product administered | 84 | 122.5 99.5–150.9ROR 130.2 · χ² 9,924 / p <1e-300 | 118.3 EB05 98.5 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1 · 93% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product physical issue | 78 | 58.1 46.8–72.1ROR 61.4 · χ² 4,307 / p <1e-300 | 57.1 EB05 47.2 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 91% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product storage error | 333 | 57.1 52.0–62.8ROR 74.4 · χ² 18,311 / p <1e-300 | 56.7 EB05 51.8 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 20.0 | no trial data cached |
| Therapy cessation | 86 | 24.9 20.3–30.6ROR 26.5 · χ² 1,953 / p <1e-300 | 24.8 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 85% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product use issue | 153 | 12.1 10.4–14.1ROR 13.5 · χ² 1,561 / p <1e-300 | 12.0 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 99% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Expired product administered | 22 | 9.8 6.5–14.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 166 / p 4e-38 | 8.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 86% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Amenorrhoea (missed periods) | 11 | 9.7 5.4–17.6ROR 9.8 · χ² 78 / p 6e-19 | 7.9 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 22.1 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission issue | 184 | 9.6 8.4–10.9ROR 10.8 · χ² 1,420 / p <1e-300 | 9.4 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 17.1 · 95% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Acne | 46 | 8.9 6.7–11.9ROR 9.2 · χ² 317 / p 3e-71 | 8.5 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 41.6 · 74% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Skin irritation | 23 | 7.4 4.9–11.1ROR 7.5 · χ² 121 / p 1e-28 | 6.6 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | 78% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product quality issue | 67 | 7.4 5.8–9.3ROR 7.7 · χ² 364 / p 2e-81 | 7.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 88% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Therapy interrupted | 21 | 4.5 2.9–6.9ROR 4.6 · χ² 54 / p 1e-13 | 4.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.3 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error | 10 | 4.4 2.4–8.2ROR 4.4 · χ² 23 / p 8e-7 | 3.7 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +0.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Skin burning sensation | 19 | 4.0 2.5–6.2ROR 4.0 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10 | 3.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 35.0 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product storage error | 333 | 57.1 52.0–62.8ROR 74.4 · χ² 18,311 / p <1e-300 | 56.7 EB05 51.8 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 20.0 | no trial data cached |
| Product use complaint | 286 | 278.0 250.4–308.7ROR 348.0 · χ² 77,251 / p <1e-300 | 268.0 EB05 242.9 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1 · 88% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission issue | 184 | 9.6 8.4–10.9ROR 10.8 · χ² 1,420 / p <1e-300 | 9.4 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 17.1 · 95% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product use issue | 153 | 12.1 10.4–14.1ROR 13.5 · χ² 1,561 / p <1e-300 | 12.0 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 99% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Therapy cessation | 86 | 24.9 20.3–30.6ROR 26.5 · χ² 1,953 / p <1e-300 | 24.8 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 85% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Poor quality product administered | 84 | 122.5 99.5–150.9ROR 130.2 · χ² 9,924 / p <1e-300 | 118.3 EB05 98.5 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1 · 93% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product physical issue | 78 | 58.1 46.8–72.1ROR 61.4 · χ² 4,307 / p <1e-300 | 57.1 EB05 47.2 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 91% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Product quality issue | 67 | 7.4 5.8–9.3ROR 7.7 · χ² 364 / p 2e-81 | 7.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 88% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Acne | 46 | 8.9 6.7–11.9ROR 9.2 · χ² 317 / p 3e-71 | 8.5 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 41.6 · 74% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Skin irritation | 23 | 7.4 4.9–11.1ROR 7.5 · χ² 121 / p 1e-28 | 6.6 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | 78% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Expired product administered | 22 | 9.8 6.5–14.9ROR 9.9 · χ² 166 / p 4e-38 | 8.9 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 86% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Therapy interrupted | 21 | 4.5 2.9–6.9ROR 4.6 · χ² 54 / p 1e-13 | 4.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.3 · 81% consumer | no trial data cached |
| Skin burning sensation | 19 | 4.0 2.5–6.2ROR 4.0 · χ² 39 / p 2e-10 | 3.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 35.0 | no trial data cached |
| Accidental exposure to product | 11 | 1.6 0.9–2.9ROR 1.6 · χ² 2 / p 0.074 | 1.6 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.4 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Reporting / coding artifact | – | no trial data cached |
| Amenorrhoea (missed periods) | 11 | 9.7 5.4–17.6ROR 9.8 · χ² 78 / p 6e-19 | 7.9 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 22.1 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Poor quality product administered — n=84, PRR 122.5
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Clascoterone?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Clascoterone are poor quality product administered, acne, skin irritation, skin burning sensation, amenorrhoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Clascoterone have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Clascoterone has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Clascoterone causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 1673a84b-7f5c-47ab-a99c-1e3db21a6a09, effective 20250102; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"CLASCOTERONE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 21 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.