← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Clonidine Transdermal System side effects: what 2,071 FDA adverse event reports show

Clonidine Transdermal System · 48 reaction terms · 2,218 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Central alpha-2 Adrenergic Agonist

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

2,071 reports · 27% serious · 61 with death outcome · 67% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Clonidine Transdermal System, USP is indicated in the treatment of hypertension. It may be employed alone or concomitantly with other antihypertensive agents.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Clonidine Transdermal System, USP provides continuous systemic delivery of clonidine for 7 days at an approximately constant rate. Clonidine is a centrally acting alpha‑agonist hypotensive agent.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 26 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 7Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 9
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 22 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Application site pruritus343155.4
140.9–171.3ROR 186.0 · χ² 51,703 / p <1e-300
151.7 EB05 138.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Application site rash195145.1
126.9–166.1ROR 160.1 · χ² 27,390 / p <1e-300
141.1 EB05 125.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Application site erythema301117.1
105.5–130.1ROR 136.9 · χ² 34,189 / p <1e-300
115.0 EB05 104.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Application site irritation12098.6
82.8–117.4ROR 104.6 · χ² 11,388 / p <1e-300
96.2 EB05 82.6 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Product adhesion issue16447.0
40.6–54.5ROR 51.0 · χ² 7,324 / p <1e-300
46.6 EB05 40.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=17 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Application site pain8137.4
30.2–46.3ROR 38.9 · χ² 2,824 / p <1e-300
37.0 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure fluctuation3012.6
8.9–18.0ROR 12.8 · χ² 310 / p 1e-69
12.2 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 10.2 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Product packaging quantity issue1110.2
5.7–18.4ROR 10.3 · χ² 82 / p 6e-20
8.3 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Blood pressure systolic increased189.3
5.9–14.7ROR 9.4 · χ² 125 / p 2e-29
8.1 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 15.6no trial data cached
Blood pressure abnormal178.7
5.4–14.0ROR 8.8 · χ² 108 / p 1e-25
7.5 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Scar148.3
4.9–13.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 82 / p 6e-20
6.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.6no trial data cached
Drug effect decreased376.9
5.0–9.4ROR 7.0 · χ² 180 / p 3e-41
6.4 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.8 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Hypertension (high blood pressure)1436.8
5.8–8.0ROR 7.3 · χ² 713 / p 2e-157
6.7 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Product quality issue826.2
5.0–7.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 351 / p 1e-78
6.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.4 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Pharmaceutical product complaint135.0
2.9–8.6ROR 5.0 · χ² 38 / p 4e-10
4.3 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process954.8
3.9–5.8ROR 4.9 · χ² 281 / p 2e-63
4.7 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.5 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Medication error264.7
3.2–7.0ROR 4.8 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18
4.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.4no trial data cached
Skin irritation204.4
2.9–6.8ROR 4.4 · χ² 50 / p 1e-12
4.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Renal failure acute184.2
2.7–6.7ROR 4.3 · χ² 41 / p 6e-11
3.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Sedation103.9
2.1–7.2ROR 3.9 · χ² 19 / p 8e-6
3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Product substitution issue173.0
1.9–4.8ROR 3.0 · χ² 21 / p 3e-6
2.8 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Withdrawal syndrome102.4
1.3–4.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 7 / p 0.004
2.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.1Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.2no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Application site pruritus343155.4
140.9–171.3ROR 186.0 · χ² 51,703 / p <1e-300
151.7 EB05 138.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Application site erythema301117.1
105.5–130.1ROR 136.9 · χ² 34,189 / p <1e-300
115.0 EB05 104.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Application site rash195145.1
126.9–166.1ROR 160.1 · χ² 27,390 / p <1e-300
141.1 EB05 125.3 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Product adhesion issue16447.0
40.6–54.5ROR 51.0 · χ² 7,324 / p <1e-300
46.6 EB05 40.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=17 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Hypertension (high blood pressure)1436.8
5.8–8.0ROR 7.3 · χ² 713 / p 2e-157
6.7 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 8.9no trial data cached
Application site irritation12098.6
82.8–117.4ROR 104.6 · χ² 11,388 / p <1e-300
96.2 EB05 82.6 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Wrong technique in product usage process954.8
3.9–5.8ROR 4.9 · χ² 281 / p 2e-63
4.7 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.5 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Product quality issue826.2
5.0–7.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 351 / p 1e-78
6.0 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.4 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Application site pain8137.4
30.2–46.3ROR 38.9 · χ² 2,824 / p <1e-300
37.0 EB05 30.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Drug effect decreased376.9
5.0–9.4ROR 7.0 · χ² 180 / p 3e-41
6.4 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.8 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure fluctuation3012.6
8.9–18.0ROR 12.8 · χ² 310 / p 1e-69
12.2 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 10.2 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Medication error264.7
3.2–7.0ROR 4.8 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18
4.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.4no trial data cached
Skin irritation204.4
2.9–6.8ROR 4.4 · χ² 50 / p 1e-12
4.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Clonidine ↔ Rebound hypertension / withdrawal syndrome.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Clonidine Transdermal System?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Clonidine Transdermal System are application site pruritus, application site erythema, blood pressure increased, application site rash, hypertension, application site irritation. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Clonidine Transdermal System have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Clonidine Transdermal System has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Clonidine Transdermal System causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.