← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Cyclosporine Ophthalmic side effects: what 4,969 FDA adverse event reports show

Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution · 38 reaction terms · 6,757 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Calcineurin Inhibitor Immunosuppressant

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) of the closest related product

Label matched

Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution (Vevye)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

4,969 reports · 1% serious · 4 with death outcome · 89% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

VEVYE indicated for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. VEVYE (cyclosporine ophthalmic solution) 0.1% is a calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppressant indicated for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease. ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

VEVYE (cyclosporine ophthalmic solution) 0.1% contains the immunomodulatory agent cyclosporine. Cyclosporine's chemical name is Cyclo[[€-(2S,3R,4R)-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-(methylamino)-6-octenoy.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 22 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 4No label text to screen 18
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 16 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Eye irritation2,027159.2
153.8–164.8ROR 268.2 · χ² 307,635 / p <1e-300
153.2 EB05 147.7 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 51.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular discomfort20280.0
69.8–91.6ROR 83.3 · χ² 15,384 / p <1e-300
77.9 EB05 69.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=2 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pain74257.5
53.7–61.4ROR 67.4 · χ² 40,650 / p <1e-300
56.6 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 64.2 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pruritus33843.7
39.4–48.5ROR 46.8 · χ² 13,934 / p <1e-300
43.2 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 43.2 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia44840.8
37.4–44.6ROR 44.8 · χ² 17,243 / p <1e-300
40.4 EB05 37.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 36.2 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Lacrimation increased21931.1
27.4–35.5ROR 32.5 · χ² 6,322 / p <1e-300
30.8 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
96% consumerno trial data cached
Eye discharge6426.6
20.8–33.9ROR 26.9 · χ² 1,542 / p <1e-300
26.2 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Dry eye24821.7
19.2–24.5ROR 22.8 · χ² 4,863 / p <1e-300
21.6 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 10.8 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Eye swelling12714.5
12.2–17.3ROR 14.9 · χ² 1,585 / p <1e-300
14.4 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 32.9 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Eye inflammation2812.6
8.7–18.2ROR 12.6 · χ² 286 / p 2e-64
12.0 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
96% consumerno trial data cached
Vision blurred (blurred vision)37211.5
10.4–12.7ROR 12.4 · χ² 3,576 / p <1e-300
11.5 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 13.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)439.7
7.2–13.1ROR 9.8 · χ² 328 / p 1e-73
9.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 33.3 · 98% consumerno trial data cached
Product odour abnormal239.4
6.2–14.1ROR 9.4 · χ² 163 / p 1e-37
8.4 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact91% consumerno trial data cached
Vitreous floaters156.5
3.9–10.8ROR 6.5 · χ² 64 / p 5e-16
5.5 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
–no trial data cached
Eye infection124.5
2.6–8.0ROR 4.5 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8
3.9 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
–no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,2964.2
4.0–4.4ROR 5.3 · χ² 3,308 / p <1e-300
4.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Eye disorder273.5
2.4–5.1ROR 3.5 · χ² 45 / p 9e-12
3.3 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 19.9 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Drug hypersensitivity1563.4
2.9–4.0ROR 3.5 · χ² 263 / p 2e-59
3.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 8.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Product use complaint102.7
1.5–5.1ROR 2.7 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
2.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.3Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Product quality issue842.6
2.1–3.3ROR 2.7 · χ² 84 / p 3e-20
2.6 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact95% consumerno trial data cached
Hypersensitivity (allergic reaction)1082.5
2.0–3.0ROR 2.5 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
2.4 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.0 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Diplopia (double vision)132.1
1.2–3.6ROR 2.1 · χ² 7 / p 0.005
2.0 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.1No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
–no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Eye irritation2,027159.2
153.8–164.8ROR 268.2 · χ² 307,635 / p <1e-300
153.2 EB05 147.7 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 51.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,2964.2
4.0–4.4ROR 5.3 · χ² 3,308 / p <1e-300
4.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pain74257.5
53.7–61.4ROR 67.4 · χ² 40,650 / p <1e-300
56.6 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 64.2 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular hyperaemia44840.8
37.4–44.6ROR 44.8 · χ² 17,243 / p <1e-300
40.4 EB05 37.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 36.2 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Vision blurred (blurred vision)37211.5
10.4–12.7ROR 12.4 · χ² 3,576 / p <1e-300
11.5 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 13.4 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Eye pruritus33843.7
39.4–48.5ROR 46.8 · χ² 13,934 / p <1e-300
43.2 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 43.2 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Dry eye24821.7
19.2–24.5ROR 22.8 · χ² 4,863 / p <1e-300
21.6 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 10.8 · 94% consumerno trial data cached
Lacrimation increased21931.1
27.4–35.5ROR 32.5 · χ² 6,322 / p <1e-300
30.8 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
96% consumerno trial data cached
Ocular discomfort20280.0
69.8–91.6ROR 83.3 · χ² 15,384 / p <1e-300
77.9 EB05 69.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=2 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Drug hypersensitivity1563.4
2.9–4.0ROR 3.5 · χ² 263 / p 2e-59
3.4 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 8.2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Eye swelling12714.5
12.2–17.3ROR 14.9 · χ² 1,585 / p <1e-300
14.4 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 32.9 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Hypersensitivity (allergic reaction)1082.5
2.0–3.0ROR 2.5 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
2.4 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.0 · 97% consumerno trial data cached
Product quality issue842.6
2.1–3.3ROR 2.7 · χ² 84 / p 3e-20
2.6 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact95% consumerno trial data cached
Eye discharge6426.6
20.8–33.9ROR 26.9 · χ² 1,542 / p <1e-300
26.2 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=2 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Photophobia (light sensitivity)439.7
7.2–13.1ROR 9.8 · χ² 328 / p 1e-73
9.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 33.3 · 98% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Cyclosporine ↔ Nephrotoxicity.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Cyclosporine Ophthalmic are eye irritation, eye pain, ocular hyperaemia, vision blurred, eye pruritus, dry eye. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Cyclosporine Ophthalmic have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Cyclosporine Ophthalmic has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Cyclosporine Ophthalmic causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.