← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Danazol side effects: what 2,802 FDA adverse event reports show

Danazol · 164 reaction terms · 6,020 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Androgen

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

2,802 reports · 84% serious · 376 with death outcome · 56% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Endometriosis Danazol capsules are indicated for the treatment of endometriosis amenable to hormonal management. Hereditary Angioedema Danazol capsules are indicated for the prevention of attacks of angioedema of all types (cutaneous, abdominal, laryngeal) in males and females.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Danazol, USP is a synthetic steroid derived from ethisterone. It is a white to pale yellow crystalline powder, practically insoluble or insoluble in water, and sparingly soluble in alcohol.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Use of danazol in pregnancy is contraindicated. A sensitive test (e.g., beta subunit test if available) capable of determining early pregnancy is recommended immediately prior to start of therapy. Additionally a non-hormonal method of contraception should be used during therapy.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 7Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 124 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hereditary angioedema226164.5
144.9–186.7ROR 178.8 · χ² 35,781 / p <1e-300
158.8 EB05 142.2 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 118.4no trial data cached
Swollen tongue22854.9
48.5–62.2ROR 59.7 · χ² 11,948 / p <1e-300
54.3 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.6 · ♀ 99% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Angioedema (deep swelling of face/throat)24842.2
37.5–47.6ROR 46.3 · χ² 9,911 / p <1e-300
41.9 EB05 37.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 30.5 · ♀ 97% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Dysphonia23329.9
26.5–33.9ROR 32.6 · χ² 6,481 / p <1e-300
29.8 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication20427.5
24.1–31.4ROR 29.5 · χ² 5,171 / p <1e-300
27.3 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 41.6 · ♀ 91% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Swelling face23326.9
23.8–30.4ROR 29.2 · χ² 5,778 / p <1e-300
26.7 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.1 · ♀ 98% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Splenomegaly3824.3
17.7–33.4ROR 24.7 · χ² 825 / p 9e-182
24.0 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.3no trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome4020.7
15.2–28.2ROR 21.0 · χ² 730 / p 5e-161
20.5 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.4 · ♀ 18% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Platelet count increased3419.5
14.0–27.3ROR 19.7 · χ² 577 / p 7e-128
19.3 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 16.6no trial data cached
Drug intolerance23618.4
16.3–20.8ROR 20.0 · χ² 3,869 / p <1e-300
18.3 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.5 · ♀ 96% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Petechiae2115.1
9.9–23.2ROR 15.2 · χ² 263 / p 2e-59
14.6 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding2714.8
10.2–21.5ROR 14.9 · χ² 333 / p 1e-74
14.4 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.2no trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect decreased7612.8
10.3–16.0ROR 13.2 · χ² 817 / p 5e-180
12.7 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased2712.7
8.7–18.5ROR 12.8 · χ² 279 / p 7e-63
12.1 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.6no trial data cached
Hepatic enzyme increased11012.1
10.1–14.6ROR 12.6 · χ² 1,113 / p 2e-244
12.0 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 11.7 · ♀ 17% (drug 56%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Incorrect route of product administration2712.0
8.3–17.5ROR 12.1 · χ² 262 / p 3e-59
11.4 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.5 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Infusion related reaction (reaction during infusion)9811.1
9.1–13.5ROR 11.5 · χ² 893 / p 2e-196
10.9 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · ♀ 6% (drug 56%) · 97% clinicianno trial data cached
Body height decreased1611.1
6.8–18.1ROR 11.1 · χ² 137 / p 7e-32
9.8 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased14710.7
9.1–12.5ROR 11.2 · χ² 1,287 / p 4e-282
10.6 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Hepatomegaly1410.6
6.3–17.9ROR 10.7 · χ² 112 / p 1e-26
9.1 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown)5810.4
8.1–13.5ROR 10.6 · χ² 486 / p 7e-108
10.1 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.1 · ♀ 25% (drug 56%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Hypersensitivity (allergic reaction)24710.0
8.9–11.2ROR 10.8 · χ² 2,001 / p <1e-300
9.9 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7 · ♀ 97% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Acute myeloid leukaemia209.6
6.2–14.9ROR 9.7 · χ² 146 / p 7e-34
8.6 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Nephropathy toxic128.1
4.6–14.2ROR 8.1 · χ² 67 / p 1e-16
6.5 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)1208.1
6.8–9.6ROR 8.4 · χ² 738 / p 1e-162
7.9 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.7 · ♀ 35% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Bone marrow failure228.0
5.3–12.2ROR 8.1 · χ² 129 / p 4e-30
7.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Transfusion117.8
4.3–14.1ROR 7.9 · χ² 59 / p 9e-15
6.2 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Migraine947.4
6.1–9.0ROR 7.6 · χ² 517 / p 9e-115
7.2 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9 · ♀ 15% (drug 56%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood count abnormal157.3
4.4–12.1ROR 7.3 · χ² 75 / p 2e-18
6.2 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Hypercalcaemia116.7
3.7–12.0ROR 6.7 · χ² 48 / p 3e-12
5.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9no trial data cached
Therapy non-responder396.5
4.8–8.9ROR 6.6 · χ² 178 / p 7e-41
6.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.2 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome246.4
4.3–9.6ROR 6.5 · χ² 105 / p 7e-25
5.8 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4 · ♀ 0% (drug 56%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Product availability issue196.3
4.1–9.9ROR 6.4 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
5.6 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Full blood count decreased176.3
3.9–10.1ROR 6.3 · χ² 71 / p 2e-17
5.5 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Insurance issue126.0
3.4–10.6ROR 6.1 · χ² 46 / p 7e-12
5.0 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
White blood cell count increased316.0
4.2–8.6ROR 6.1 · χ² 125 / p 2e-29
5.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Dermatitis allergic106.0
3.2–11.1ROR 6.0 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
4.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Chromaturia186.0
3.8–9.5ROR 6.0 · χ² 69 / p 4e-17
5.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.4no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)4423.8
3.5–4.2ROR 4.3 · χ² 952 / p 2e-209
3.8 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · ♀ 79% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Headache3404.1
3.7–4.5ROR 4.5 · χ² 806 / p 2e-177
4.0 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 5.5 · ♀ 89% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Angioedema (deep swelling of face/throat)24842.2
37.5–47.6ROR 46.3 · χ² 9,911 / p <1e-300
41.9 EB05 37.7 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 30.5 · ♀ 97% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Hypersensitivity (allergic reaction)24710.0
8.9–11.2ROR 10.8 · χ² 2,001 / p <1e-300
9.9 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7 · ♀ 97% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Drug intolerance23618.4
16.3–20.8ROR 20.0 · χ² 3,869 / p <1e-300
18.3 EB05 16.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.5 · ♀ 96% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Swelling face23326.9
23.8–30.4ROR 29.2 · χ² 5,778 / p <1e-300
26.7 EB05 24.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 30.1 · ♀ 98% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Dysphonia23329.9
26.5–33.9ROR 32.6 · χ² 6,481 / p <1e-300
29.8 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Swollen tongue22854.9
48.5–62.2ROR 59.7 · χ² 11,948 / p <1e-300
54.3 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.6 · ♀ 99% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Hereditary angioedema226164.5
144.9–186.7ROR 178.8 · χ² 35,781 / p <1e-300
158.8 EB05 142.2 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 118.4no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication20427.5
24.1–31.4ROR 29.5 · χ² 5,171 / p <1e-300
27.3 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 41.6 · ♀ 91% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1564.8
4.1–5.6ROR 5.0 · χ² 467 / p 6e-104
4.7 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.0 · ♀ 80% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased14710.7
9.1–12.5ROR 11.2 · χ² 1,287 / p 4e-282
10.6 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Constipation1294.5
3.8–5.3ROR 4.6 · χ² 346 / p 1e-77
4.4 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.1 · ♀ 23% (drug 56%)no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)1208.1
6.8–9.6ROR 8.4 · χ² 738 / p 1e-162
7.9 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.7 · ♀ 35% (drug 56%)no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Danazol?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Danazol are headache, angioedema, hypersensitivity, swelling face, dysphonia, swollen tongue. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Danazol have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Use of danazol in pregnancy is contraindicated. A sensitive test (e.g., beta subunit test if available) capable of determining early pregnancy is recommended immediately prior to start of therapy. Additionally a non-hormonal method of contraception should be used during therapy.

Do FAERS signals prove that Danazol causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.