← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Dextromethorphan and Quinidine side effects: what 3,616 FDA adverse event reports show

Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide And Quinidine Sulfate · 112 reaction terms · 3,432 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide (Stona)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

3,616 reports · 34% serious · 278 with death outcome · 66% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

temporarily relieves cough due to minor throat and bronchial irritation associated with ■a cold ■inhaled irritants

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 6No label text to screen 34
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 72 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Inability to afford medication10160.2
49.6–73.0ROR 61.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
58.9 EB05 49.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=11 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Affect lability4527.1
20.3–36.3ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
26.7 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 30.0no trial data cached
Therapy interrupted16113.6
11.7–15.8ROR 14.1 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.5 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.8 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Crying8313.2
10.7–16.4ROR 13.5 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
13.1 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Drug effective for unapproved indication6613.1
10.3–16.7ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
12.9 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=4 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected8010.3
8.3–12.8ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
10.1 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
Insurance issue2610.2
6.9–14.9ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓
9.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.0 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Muscle spasticity198.9
5.7–13.9ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.058
7.8 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Disease recurrence637.7
6.0–9.8ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.077
7.3 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.5 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Central nervous system lesion187.6
4.8–12.0ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.094
6.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Aggression637.3
5.7–9.3ROR 7.4 · calibrated p 0.089
7.0 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse816.8
5.5–8.4ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.105
6.6 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis566.8
5.2–8.8ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.111
6.4 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.0 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Lethargy636.4
5.0–8.1ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.129
6.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)1016.2
5.1–7.5ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.133
6.0 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Dementia296.0
4.2–8.7ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.158
5.5 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 9.9no trial data cached
Therapy cessation536.0
4.6–7.9ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.151
5.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.5 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Hospice care105.9
3.2–10.9ROR 5.9 · calibrated p 0.194
4.7 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Serotonin syndrome195.8
3.7–9.0ROR 5.8 · calibrated p 0.185
5.1 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 9.4no trial data cached
Hypersomnia285.7
3.9–8.2ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.184
5.2 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.0 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Anger335.6
4.0–7.9ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.185
5.2 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Delusion155.6
3.4–9.3ROR 5.6 · calibrated p 0.202
4.9 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Aphasia (loss of speech)295.6
3.9–8.0ROR 5.6 · calibrated p 0.193
5.1 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Abnormal behaviour375.4
3.9–7.4ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.204
5.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.5no trial data cached
Sedation245.3
3.6–8.0ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.215
4.9 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Agitation655.1
4.0–6.5ROR 5.2 · calibrated p 0.221
4.9 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.3no trial data cached
Bedridden114.9
2.7–8.8ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.287
4.1 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Hallucination, visual174.7
2.9–7.6ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.293
4.2 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1954.6
4.0–5.3ROR 4.8 · calibrated p 0.255
4.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Hallucination (hallucinations)564.3
3.3–5.6ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.321
4.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Activities of daily living impaired154.3
2.6–7.2ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.348
3.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.6no trial data cached
Dysarthria (slurred speech)284.3
3.0–6.2ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.335
4.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.7no trial data cached
Choking144.2
2.5–7.1ROR 4.2 · calibrated p 0.374
3.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.4no trial data cached
Psychotic disorder214.1
2.7–6.3ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.373
3.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Gait inability234.0
2.7–6.1ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.387
3.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.6 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Muscle twitching164.0
2.5–6.5ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.399
3.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Speech disorder364.0
2.9–5.5ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.387
3.8 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia oral103.9
2.1–7.2ROR 3.9 · calibrated p 0.445
3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Drug effect decreased363.8
2.8–5.3ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.419
3.7 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Feeding disorder133.8
2.2–6.5ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.450
3.4 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fall2073.6
3.2–4.1ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.425
3.6 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication1954.6
4.0–5.3ROR 4.8 · calibrated p 0.255
4.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.4 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Therapy interrupted16113.6
11.7–15.8ROR 14.1 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.5 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.8 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Somnolence (drowsiness)1033.0
2.5–3.6ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.620
2.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)1016.2
5.1–7.5ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.133
6.0 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Inability to afford medication10160.2
49.6–73.0ROR 61.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
58.9 EB05 49.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=11 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Gait disturbance972.9
2.4–3.6ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.635
2.9 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.6 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Product use issue952.9
2.4–3.6ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.630
2.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue911.9
1.5–2.3ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.875
1.8 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Crying8313.2
10.7–16.4ROR 13.5 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
13.1 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 12.0no trial data cached
Multiple sclerosis relapse816.8
5.5–8.4ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.105
6.6 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Therapeutic response unexpected8010.3
8.3–12.8ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
10.1 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
Seizure743.7
3.0–4.7ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.423
3.7 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Drug effective for unapproved indication6613.1
10.3–16.7ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
12.9 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=4 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Memory impairment652.7
2.2–3.5ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.709
2.7 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.9 · 73% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Gentamicin Sulfate ↔ Renal Failure.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Dextromethorphan and Quinidine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Dextromethorphan and Quinidine are fall, somnolence, dysphagia, inability to afford medication, gait disturbance, crying. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Dextromethorphan and Quinidine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Dextromethorphan and Quinidine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Dextromethorphan and Quinidine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.