← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Diclofenac Epolamine side effects: what 4,257 FDA adverse event reports show

Diclofenac Epolamine · 182 reaction terms · 4,396 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (nsaid), and is

FDA label, Indications wording

Who reports

4,257 reports · 35% serious · 113 with death outcome · 73% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

DICLOFENAC EPOLAMINE TOPICAL SYSTEM 1.3% is indicated for the topical treatment of acute pain due to minor strains, sprains, and contusions in adults and pediatric patients 6 years and older. • DICLOFENAC EPOLAMINE TOPICAL SYSTEM 1.3% is a nonsteroidal.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DICLOFENAC EPOLAMINE TOPICAL SYSTEM 1.3% is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for topical application. DICLOFENAC EPOLAMINE TOPICAL SYSTEM 1.3% is a 10 cm × 14 cm topical system comprised .

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

RISK OF SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR and GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS WARNING: RISK OF SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR and GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Nonsteroidal anti-inflamma.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 5Labeled (related wording) 7Reporting / coding artifact 6Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 142 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product adhesion issue10013.9
11.5–16.9ROR 14.2 · χ² 1,186 / p 4e-260
13.8 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=9 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Body height decreased2712.3
8.5–18.0ROR 12.4 · χ² 269 / p 8e-61
11.7 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Application site pruritus5411.7
9.0–15.3ROR 11.9 · χ² 519 / p 3e-115
11.4 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=2 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Poor quality product administered2210.6
7.0–16.1ROR 10.7 · χ² 182 / p 1e-41
9.7 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed82% consumerno trial data cached
Secretion discharge208.0
5.2–12.4ROR 8.0 · χ² 115 / p 4e-27
7.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.6 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Back disorder257.5
5.1–11.2ROR 7.6 · χ² 135 / p 1e-31
6.8 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.4 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Eosinophilia267.3
5.0–10.8ROR 7.4 · χ² 136 / p 1e-31
6.6 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.8 · ♀ 25% (drug 73%)no trial data cached
Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion157.3
4.4–12.0ROR 7.3 · χ² 75 / p 3e-18
6.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.2no trial data cached
Expired product administered487.1
5.4–9.5ROR 7.2 · χ² 247 / p 6e-56
6.7 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=9 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Obstructive airways disorder156.6
4.0–11.0ROR 6.6 · χ² 66 / p 2e-16
5.6 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.4no trial data cached
Bursitis156.1
3.7–10.2ROR 6.1 · χ² 59 / p 7e-15
5.2 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication675.9
4.7–7.5ROR 6.0 · χ² 270 / p 6e-61
5.7 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Intervertebral disc protrusion245.4
3.6–8.0ROR 5.4 · χ² 82 / p 8e-20
4.9 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Intervertebral disc degeneration105.3
2.9–9.8ROR 5.3 · χ² 31 / p 2e-8
4.3 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1no trial data cached
Pneumothorax175.3
3.3–8.5ROR 5.3 · χ² 55 / p 7e-14
4.7 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Fibromyalgia265.3
3.6–7.7ROR 5.3 · χ² 86 / p 1e-20
4.8 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3 · ♀ 96% (drug 73%)no trial data cached
Breast pain115.1
2.8–9.2ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 7e-9
4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Drug effect incomplete385.1
3.7–7.0ROR 5.1 · χ² 121 / p 2e-28
4.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Drug administered at inappropriate site104.6
2.5–8.6ROR 4.6 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Poor quality sleep204.6
3.0–7.1ROR 4.6 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
4.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.3no trial data cached
Intentional product misuse804.5
3.7–5.6ROR 4.6 · χ² 218 / p 1e-49
4.4 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Seasonal allergy134.5
2.6–7.8ROR 4.5 · χ² 32 / p 6e-9
4.0 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Neuralgia224.5
2.9–6.8ROR 4.5 · χ² 56 / p 4e-14
4.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Hyponatraemia (low sodium)474.1
3.1–5.5ROR 4.2 · χ² 108 / p 1e-25
4.0 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Pelvic pain154.1
2.5–6.7ROR 4.1 · χ² 32 / p 9e-9
3.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9no trial data cached
Conjunctivitis154.0
2.4–6.7ROR 4.0 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
3.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.6no trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia oral123.9
2.2–6.9ROR 3.9 · χ² 23 / p 7e-7
3.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.0no trial data cached
Tinnitus (ringing in the ears)353.7
2.7–5.2ROR 3.8 · χ² 68 / p 9e-17
3.6 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Osteoarthritis323.7
2.6–5.2ROR 3.7 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
3.5 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.1no trial data cached
Hyperkalaemia (high potassium)263.7
2.5–5.4ROR 3.7 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12
3.5 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.2no trial data cached
Skin reaction103.5
1.9–6.5ROR 3.5 · χ² 15 / p 4e-5
3.1 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease543.5
2.7–4.5ROR 3.5 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
3.4 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached
Hepatocellular injury103.5
1.9–6.4ROR 3.5 · χ² 15 / p 5e-5
3.1 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)6582.5
2.3–2.6ROR 2.7 · χ² 608 / p 2e-134
2.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Pain2802.2
2.0–2.5ROR 2.3 · χ² 197 / p 5e-45
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Product adhesion issue10013.9
11.5–16.9ROR 14.2 · χ² 1,186 / p 4e-260
13.8 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=9 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort972.9
2.3–3.5ROR 2.9 · χ² 116 / p 2e-27
2.8 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Feeling abnormal941.9
1.6–2.4ROR 1.9 · χ² 41 / p 7e-11
1.9 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.8 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional product misuse804.5
3.7–5.6ROR 4.6 · χ² 218 / p 1e-49
4.4 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Erythema (skin redness)751.8
1.4–2.3ROR 1.8 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
1.8 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication675.9
4.7–7.5ROR 6.0 · χ² 270 / p 6e-61
5.7 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease543.5
2.7–4.5ROR 3.5 · χ² 93 / p 3e-22
3.4 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9no trial data cached
Application site pruritus5411.7
9.0–15.3ROR 11.9 · χ² 519 / p 3e-115
11.4 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=2 · 85% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Diclofenac Epolamine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Diclofenac Epolamine are pain, drug hypersensitivity, abdominal discomfort, feeling abnormal, acute kidney injury, erythema. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Diclofenac Epolamine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR and GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS WARNING: RISK OF SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR and GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. • Nonsteroidal anti-inflamma.

Do FAERS signals prove that Diclofenac Epolamine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.