← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine side effects: what 1,742 FDA adverse event reports show

Dolutegravir Sodium And Rilpivirine Hydrochloride · 64 reaction terms · 3,165 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Dolutegravir Sodium And Rilpivirine Hydrochloride (Juluca)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

1,742 reports · 52% serious · 96 with death outcome · 29% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

JULUCA is indicated as a complete regimen for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in adults to replace the current antiretroviral regimen in those who are virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL) on.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

JULUCA is a fixed-dose combination tablet containing dolutegravir (as dolutegravir sodium), an INSTI, and rilpivirine (as rilpivirine hydrochloride), an NNRTI.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 8Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 20
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 24 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Anhedonia251115.2
102.6–129.2ROR 134.4 · χ² 28,054 / p <1e-300
113.1 EB05 101.8 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 135.6 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Economic problem8466.0
53.5–81.3ROR 69.3 · χ² 5,284 / p <1e-300
64.7 EB05 53.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 77.0 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Osteopenia6954.7
43.4–68.9ROR 56.9 · χ² 3,569 / p <1e-300
53.7 EB05 43.9 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.6no trial data cached
End stage renal disease8354.5
44.1–67.2ROR 57.2 · χ² 4,288 / p <1e-300
53.6 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 59.6no trial data cached
Decreased activity3236.1
25.6–50.8ROR 36.7 · χ² 1,053 / p 2e-231
35.3 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 55.9no trial data cached
Quality of life decreased4035.9
26.4–48.8ROR 36.8 · χ² 1,321 / p 2e-289
35.3 EB05 27.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 46.2no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease20332.0
28.1–36.4ROR 36.0 · χ² 6,064 / p <1e-300
31.8 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 35.6no trial data cached
Bone density decreased8331.6
25.6–39.0ROR 33.2 · χ² 2,428 / p <1e-300
31.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 41.3no trial data cached
Emotional distress27827.6
24.8–30.7ROR 32.7 · χ² 7,126 / p <1e-300
27.5 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.4 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Nephropathy1721.8
13.6–35.1ROR 22.0 · χ² 317 / p 3e-71
21.3 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 25.6no trial data cached
Multiple fractures2921.1
14.7–30.3ROR 21.4 · χ² 535 / p 1e-118
20.8 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.7no trial data cached
Vitamin d deficiency1518.5
11.2–30.7ROR 18.7 · χ² 232 / p 1e-52
17.9 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.0no trial data cached
Proteinuria2918.5
12.9–26.6ROR 18.8 · χ² 464 / p 4e-103
18.3 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.8no trial data cached
Glomerular filtration rate decreased1716.9
10.5–27.2ROR 17.1 · χ² 239 / p 4e-54
16.3 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 18.9no trial data cached
Tooth loss2615.0
10.2–22.0ROR 15.2 · χ² 326 / p 4e-73
14.6 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 20.6no trial data cached
Loss of personal independence in daily activities5513.9
10.7–18.1ROR 14.4 · χ² 648 / p 3e-143
13.8 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.1no trial data cached
Foot fracture2012.7
8.2–19.6ROR 12.8 · χ² 203 / p 2e-46
11.9 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.6no trial data cached
Product dose omission issue29512.5
11.2–13.9ROR 14.8 · χ² 3,144 / p <1e-300
12.4 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Renal tubular necrosis1012.3
6.6–22.7ROR 12.3 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
10.2 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.6no trial data cached
Anxiety28512.0
10.8–13.4ROR 14.2 · χ² 2,910 / p <1e-300
12.0 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.4 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Renal impairment7711.1
8.9–13.8ROR 11.6 · χ² 699 / p 3e-154
10.9 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Dialysis1210.2
5.8–17.9ROR 10.2 · χ² 90 / p 1e-21
8.4 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Ankle fracture1310.1
5.9–17.4ROR 10.2 · χ² 98 / p 2e-23
8.5 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Drug resistance146.6
3.9–11.1ROR 6.6 · χ² 61 / p 3e-15
5.5 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Depression1206.3
5.3–7.5ROR 6.7 · χ² 538 / p 2e-119
6.2 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Impaired work ability116.2
3.4–11.1ROR 6.2 · χ² 43 / p 3e-11
5.0 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7no trial data cached
Dysstasia156.2
3.7–10.2ROR 6.2 · χ² 60 / p 5e-15
5.3 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Product dispensing error116.1
3.4–11.0ROR 6.1 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
5.0 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1no trial data cached
Pain3116.1
5.5–6.7ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,356 / p 3e-297
6.0 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.0 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Osteonecrosis (bone death)165.8
3.6–9.5ROR 5.9 · χ² 59 / p 8e-15
5.0 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Exposure during pregnancy214.1
2.7–6.2ROR 4.1 · χ² 46 / p 7e-12
3.8 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 29%)no trial data cached
Product storage error253.5
2.4–5.1ROR 3.5 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
3.3 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pain3116.1
5.5–6.7ROR 7.2 · χ² 1,356 / p 3e-297
6.0 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.0 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission issue29512.5
11.2–13.9ROR 14.8 · χ² 3,144 / p <1e-300
12.4 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Anxiety28512.0
10.8–13.4ROR 14.2 · χ² 2,910 / p <1e-300
12.0 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 18.4 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Emotional distress27827.6
24.8–30.7ROR 32.7 · χ² 7,126 / p <1e-300
27.5 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.4 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Anhedonia251115.2
102.6–129.2ROR 134.4 · χ² 28,054 / p <1e-300
113.1 EB05 101.8 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 135.6 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease20332.0
28.1–36.4ROR 36.0 · χ² 6,064 / p <1e-300
31.8 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 35.6no trial data cached
Depression1206.3
5.3–7.5ROR 6.7 · χ² 538 / p 2e-119
6.2 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 7.9 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Economic problem8466.0
53.5–81.3ROR 69.3 · χ² 5,284 / p <1e-300
64.7 EB05 53.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 77.0 · 100% consumerno trial data cached
Bone density decreased8331.6
25.6–39.0ROR 33.2 · χ² 2,428 / p <1e-300
31.3 EB05 26.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 41.3no trial data cached
End stage renal disease8354.5
44.1–67.2ROR 57.2 · χ² 4,288 / p <1e-300
53.6 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 59.6no trial data cached
Renal impairment7711.1
8.9–13.8ROR 11.6 · χ² 699 / p 3e-154
10.9 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.7no trial data cached
Osteopenia6954.7
43.4–68.9ROR 56.9 · χ² 3,569 / p <1e-300
53.7 EB05 43.9 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine are pain, anxiety, emotional distress, anhedonia, chronic kidney disease, renal failure. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.