← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Econazole side effects: what 920 FDA adverse event reports show

Econazole Nitrate · 34 reaction terms · 269 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Azole antifungal

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Econazole Nitrate (Econazole Nitrate)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

920 reports · 65% serious · 53 with death outcome · 53% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Econazole nitrate topical foam, 1%, is indicated for the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis caused by Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and Epidermophyton floccosum in patients 12 years of age and older. Econazole nitrate is an azole.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Econazole nitrate topical foam, 1% contains the azole antifungal agent, econazole nitrate in an oil-in-water emulsion base consisting of the following inactive ingredients: dimethicone, glycerin, polysorbate 20, povidone, propylene glycol, stearic acid, trolamine, purified water and butane as a propellant.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 23 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 19
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 11 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vasculitis1427.4
16.3–46.1ROR 27.8 · χ² 330 / p 5e-74
26.5 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.2no trial data cached
International normalised ratio increased3023.8
16.7–33.8ROR 24.5 · χ² 632 / p 9e-140
23.4 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 23.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Glaucoma1517.8
10.7–29.3ROR 18.0 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
17.1 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.8no trial data cached
Caesarean section917.5
9.1–33.4ROR 17.6 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
15.8 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.8no trial data cached
Weight fluctuation715.3
7.3–32.1ROR 15.4 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
12.5 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Eosinophilia1114.4
8.0–25.8ROR 14.5 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
12.8 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Blood sodium decreased1113.3
7.4–24.0ROR 13.5 · χ² 114 / p 8e-27
11.7 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms1311.6
6.8–19.9ROR 11.8 · χ² 116 / p 3e-27
10.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2no trial data cached
Fungal infection1611.0
6.7–17.8ROR 11.1 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
9.7 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Meningioma710.8
5.2–22.7ROR 10.9 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
7.9 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5no trial data cached
Hypoaesthesia oral710.6
5.1–22.2ROR 10.7 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13
7.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.6no trial data cached
Economic problem710.4
4.9–21.7ROR 10.4 · χ² 50 / p 7e-13
7.5 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.0no trial data cached
Anhedonia1210.3
5.9–18.1ROR 10.5 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
8.6 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Hepatic cytolysis59.3
3.9–22.4ROR 9.4 · χ² 29 / p 3e-8
5.9 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.2no trial data cached
Anosmia (loss of smell)57.9
3.3–18.8ROR 7.9 · χ² 23 / p 6e-7
5.1 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Procedural pain97.4
3.9–14.2ROR 7.5 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
5.7 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
Dementia97.4
3.8–14.1ROR 7.4 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11
5.6 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0no trial data cached
Drug exposure during pregnancy117.3
4.0–13.1ROR 7.3 · χ² 53 / p 1e-13
5.8 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Psychomotor hyperactivity56.8
2.9–16.4ROR 6.9 · χ² 19 / p 5e-6
4.5 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.0no trial data cached
Pain of skin65.1
2.3–11.2ROR 5.1 · χ² 16 / p 4e-5
3.8 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.2no trial data cached
Skin irritation73.5
1.7–7.3ROR 3.5 · χ² 10 / p 8e-4
3.0 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic73.2
1.5–6.7ROR 3.2 · χ² 8 / p 0.002
2.8 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus82.7
1.4–5.5ROR 2.8 · χ² 7 / p 0.004
2.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
International normalised ratio increased3023.8
16.7–33.8ROR 24.5 · χ² 632 / p 9e-140
23.4 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 23.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Fungal infection1611.0
6.7–17.8ROR 11.1 · χ² 135 / p 2e-31
9.7 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.0no trial data cached
Glaucoma1517.8
10.7–29.3ROR 18.0 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
17.1 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.8no trial data cached
Vasculitis1427.4
16.3–46.1ROR 27.8 · χ² 330 / p 5e-74
26.5 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.2no trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms1311.6
6.8–19.9ROR 11.8 · χ² 116 / p 3e-27
10.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.2no trial data cached
Anhedonia1210.3
5.9–18.1ROR 10.5 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
8.6 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Drug exposure during pregnancy117.3
4.0–13.1ROR 7.3 · χ² 53 / p 1e-13
5.8 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.1no trial data cached
Blood sodium decreased1113.3
7.4–24.0ROR 13.5 · χ² 114 / p 8e-27
11.7 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 13.3no trial data cached
Eosinophilia1114.4
8.0–25.8ROR 14.5 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
12.8 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.2no trial data cached
Dementia97.4
3.8–14.1ROR 7.4 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11
5.6 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.0no trial data cached
Procedural pain97.4
3.9–14.2ROR 7.5 · χ² 44 / p 2e-11
5.7 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2no trial data cached
Caesarean section917.5
9.1–33.4ROR 17.6 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
15.8 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.8no trial data cached
Injection site pruritus82.7
1.4–5.5ROR 2.8 · χ² 7 / p 0.004
2.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Dermatitis atopic73.2
1.5–6.7ROR 3.2 · χ² 8 / p 0.002
2.8 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious n=2no trial data cached
Skin irritation73.5
1.7–7.3ROR 3.5 · χ² 10 / p 8e-4
3.0 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Econazole?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Econazole are international normalised ratio increased, fungal infection, glaucoma, vasculitis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, anhedonia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Econazole have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Econazole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Econazole causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.