← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Eltrombopag side effects: what 7,224 FDA adverse event reports show

Eltrombopag · 335 reaction terms · 18,719 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

7,224 reports · 96% serious · 1,432 with death outcome · 53% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Eltrombopag tablets are thrombopoietin receptor agonist indicated: for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult and pediatric patients 1 year and older with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Eltrombopag tablets contain eltrombopag olamine, a small molecule thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist for oral administration. Eltrombopag olamine is a biphenyl hydrazone.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

RISK FOR HEPATIC DECOMPENSATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C and RISK OF HEPATOTOXICITY In patients with chronic hepatitis C, Eltrombopag tablets in combination with interferon and ribavirin may increase the risk of hepatic decompensation [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 8Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 16
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 295 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Platelet count increased40993.8
85.2–103.2ROR 99.4 · χ² 36,294 / p <1e-300
90.5 EB05 83.4 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 71.1no trial data cached
Petechiae26275.0
66.5–84.6ROR 77.8 · χ² 18,576 / p <1e-300
72.7 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.8no trial data cached
Platelet count decreased1,69747.0
45.1–49.0ROR 61.1 · χ² 75,483 / p <1e-300
46.2 EB05 44.4 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 33.7no trial data cached
Gingival bleeding16735.9
30.9–41.7ROR 36.7 · χ² 5,561 / p <1e-300
35.3 EB05 31.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 31.6no trial data cached
Therapy non-responder29619.4
17.3–21.7ROR 20.2 · χ² 5,123 / p <1e-300
19.3 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.8no trial data cached
Myelodysplastic syndrome7515.1
12.1–18.9ROR 15.3 · χ² 970 / p 3e-213
14.9 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Decreased immune responsiveness4714.0
10.5–18.7ROR 14.1 · χ² 553 / p 1e-122
13.8 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.4 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Therapy partial responder7213.9
11.1–17.5ROR 14.1 · χ² 848 / p 9e-187
13.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 10.0 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Acute myeloid leukaemia7413.9
11.0–17.4ROR 14.0 · χ² 866 / p 1e-190
13.7 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 8.3 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Cytopenia4711.5
8.6–15.2ROR 11.5 · χ² 437 / p 3e-97
11.1 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.9 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Product availability issue8310.8
8.7–13.4ROR 10.9 · χ² 725 / p 6e-160
10.5 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.9 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)39910.4
9.5–11.5ROR 11.0 · χ² 3,394 / p <1e-300
10.3 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Hyperbilirubinaemia3610.2
7.3–14.1ROR 10.2 · χ² 288 / p 7e-65
9.6 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.2 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased3379.5
8.6–10.6ROR 10.0 · χ² 2,570 / p <1e-300
9.4 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Disease recurrence1539.3
8.0–10.9ROR 9.5 · χ² 1,129 / p 8e-248
9.2 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.1no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus infection539.3
7.1–12.1ROR 9.3 · χ² 382 / p 2e-85
8.9 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Splenomegaly379.2
6.7–12.7ROR 9.2 · χ² 262 / p 4e-59
8.6 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Thrombotic microangiopathy309.0
6.3–12.9ROR 9.0 · χ² 205 / p 7e-47
8.3 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.4 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Haemorrhage intracranial468.9
6.7–11.9ROR 9.0 · χ² 315 / p 9e-71
8.4 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.4 · ♀ 77% (drug 53%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Contusion2938.9
7.9–9.9ROR 9.2 · χ² 2,041 / p <1e-300
8.8 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Haematoma798.8
7.1–11.0ROR 8.9 · χ² 540 / p 8e-120
8.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Epistaxis (nosebleed)2158.3
7.3–9.5ROR 8.6 · χ² 1,384 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.4no trial data cached
Haemorrhage2958.2
7.3–9.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 1,865 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)1427.4
6.3–8.7ROR 7.5 · χ² 781 / p 3e-172
7.3 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Sars-cov-2 test positive347.4
5.3–10.4ROR 7.4 · χ² 182 / p 1e-41
6.8 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=34 · ♀ 87% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Neutrophil count decreased977.0
5.7–8.5ROR 7.0 · χ² 489 / p 1e-108
6.8 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.7no trial data cached
Cerebral infarction586.9
5.3–8.9ROR 6.9 · χ² 286 / p 2e-64
6.6 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Hepatomegaly236.8
4.5–10.2ROR 6.8 · χ² 107 / p 2e-25
6.0 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4no trial data cached
Blood bilirubin increased626.7
5.2–8.5ROR 6.7 · χ² 292 / p 9e-66
6.4 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Transaminases increased506.5
5.0–8.6ROR 6.6 · χ² 229 / p 5e-52
6.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Nephropathy toxic256.5
4.4–9.7ROR 6.5 · χ² 111 / p 2e-26
5.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0 · ♀ 25% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Bacteraemia266.4
4.4–9.4ROR 6.4 · χ² 114 / p 8e-27
5.8 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Drug ineffective for unapproved indication1176.1
5.1–7.3ROR 6.2 · χ² 494 / p 8e-110
6.0 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.6 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Ischaemic stroke376.0
4.4–8.3ROR 6.0 · χ² 150 / p 1e-34
5.6 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6 · ♀ 30% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)1195.3
4.4–6.3ROR 5.4 · χ² 411 / p 1e-91
5.2 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 3.2no trial data cached
Red blood cell count decreased525.3
4.0–6.9ROR 5.3 · χ² 176 / p 2e-40
5.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication4425.3
4.8–5.8ROR 5.5 · χ² 1,536 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Acute myocardial infarction535.2
4.0–6.8ROR 5.2 · χ² 176 / p 2e-40
5.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1 · ♀ 23% (drug 53%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebral haemorrhage635.1
4.0–6.5ROR 5.2 · χ² 205 / p 9e-47
4.9 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Platelet count decreased1,69747.0
45.1–49.0ROR 61.1 · χ² 75,483 / p <1e-300
46.2 EB05 44.4 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 33.7no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8751.9
1.8–2.1ROR 2.1 · χ² 417 / p 6e-93
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)7352.5
2.3–2.6ROR 2.6 · χ² 662 / p 3e-146
2.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Death5972.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 316 / p 5e-71
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 1.2 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication4425.3
4.8–5.8ROR 5.5 · χ² 1,536 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.9no trial data cached
Platelet count increased40993.8
85.2–103.2ROR 99.4 · χ² 36,294 / p <1e-300
90.5 EB05 83.4 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 71.1no trial data cached
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)39910.4
9.5–11.5ROR 11.0 · χ² 3,394 / p <1e-300
10.3 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Headache3861.8
1.6–2.0ROR 1.8 · χ² 138 / p 4e-32
1.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · ♀ 76% (drug 53%)no trial data cached
Haemoglobin decreased3379.5
8.6–10.6ROR 10.0 · χ² 2,570 / p <1e-300
9.4 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 6.4no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)3282.8
2.5–3.1ROR 2.8 · χ² 370 / p 1e-82
2.7 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Therapy non-responder29619.4
17.3–21.7ROR 20.2 · χ² 5,123 / p <1e-300
19.3 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 17.8no trial data cached
Haemorrhage2958.2
7.3–9.2ROR 8.5 · χ² 1,865 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.0no trial data cached
Contusion2938.9
7.9–9.9ROR 9.2 · χ² 2,041 / p <1e-300
8.8 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Petechiae26275.0
66.5–84.6ROR 77.8 · χ² 18,576 / p <1e-300
72.7 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.8no trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)2571.7
1.5–1.9ROR 1.7 · χ² 74 / p 3e-18
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Eltrombopag?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Eltrombopag are platelet count decreased, platelet count increased, thrombocytopenia, headache, haemoglobin decreased, pyrexia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Eltrombopag have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK FOR HEPATIC DECOMPENSATION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C and RISK OF HEPATOTOXICITY In patients with chronic hepatitis C, Eltrombopag tablets in combination with interferon and ribavirin may increase the risk of hepatic decompensation [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Eltrombopag causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.