← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Epinephrine Hydrochloride side effects: what 461 FDA adverse event reports show

Epinephrine Hydrochloride · 59 reaction terms · 2,630 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

alpha-Adrenergic Agonist, beta-Adrenergic Agonist, Catecholamine

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

461 reports · 89% serious · 38 with death outcome · 48% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Epinephrine is a non-selective alpha and beta adrenergic agonist indicated: • To increase mean arterial blood pressure in adult patients with hypotension associated with septic shock. ( 1.1 ) • For emergency treatment of allergic reactions (Type 1), including anaphylaxis. ( 1.2 ) • For induction and maintenance of mydriasis during intraocular surgery.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Epinephrine Injection USP, 1 mg/mL is supplied as a sterile aqueous solution with a pH range of 2.2 to 5.0, that is colorless and nonpyrogenic. Each milliliter contains 1 mg epinephrine, sodiu.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Reporting / coding artifact 5Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 19 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Impaired quality of life56177.7
138.9–227.3ROR 202.1 · χ² 9,632 / p <1e-300
167.0 EB05 133.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 167.1 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Tubulointerstitial nephritis71173.1
139.7–214.5ROR 204.4 · χ² 11,939 / p <1e-300
164.8 EB05 135.1 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 111.9 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements72122.0
98.7–150.9ROR 144.4 · χ² 8,511 / p <1e-300
118.0 EB05 96.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 121.6 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Loss of personal independence in daily activities122117.0
100.4–136.3ROR 158.7 · χ² 13,909 / p <1e-300
114.6 EB05 98.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 99.5 · ♀ 17% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Swollen tongue71103.5
83.6–128.3ROR 122.2 · χ² 7,101 / p <1e-300
100.6 EB05 82.4 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 93.8 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Obstructive airways disorder2498.0
66.4–144.7ROR 103.3 · χ² 2,205 / p <1e-300
90.9 EB05 64.3 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 65.8 · ♀ 92% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Full blood count abnormal2295.1
63.2–143.0ROR 99.8 · χ² 1,952 / p <1e-300
87.9 EB05 61.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 81.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Systemic lupus erythematosus7394.1
76.2–116.1ROR 111.6 · χ² 6,625 / p <1e-300
91.7 EB05 75.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 62.3 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Nightmare7193.1
75.1–115.3ROR 109.9 · χ² 6,374 / p <1e-300
90.7 EB05 74.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 102.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Accidental overdose7391.0
73.7–112.4ROR 108.0 · χ² 6,408 / p <1e-300
88.8 EB05 73.0 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 96.7 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative7576.6
62.3–94.3ROR 91.3 · χ² 5,524 / p <1e-300
75.1 EB05 61.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 53.2 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Rectal haemorrhage7175.0
60.6–92.9ROR 88.5 · χ² 5,114 / p <1e-300
73.5 EB05 60.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.0 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Tinnitus (ringing in the ears)7069.3
55.8–86.0ROR 81.5 · χ² 4,647 / p <1e-300
68.0 EB05 55.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 69.0 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Eczema7265.2
52.7–80.6ROR 77.1 · χ² 4,492 / p <1e-300
64.0 EB05 52.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 123.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Respiratory tract congestion2263.0
41.9–94.7ROR 66.1 · χ² 1,280 / p 1e-280
59.8 EB05 41.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 94.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Premature delivery2262.6
41.6–94.2ROR 65.7 · χ² 1,272 / p 5e-279
59.5 EB05 41.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 41.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Haematochezia (blood in stool)7259.5
48.1–73.6ROR 70.3 · χ² 4,089 / p <1e-300
58.6 EB05 48.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.3 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Medication error6855.8
44.8–69.5ROR 65.3 · χ² 3,610 / p <1e-300
54.9 EB05 44.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 58.5 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Vertigo (spinning dizziness)7253.8
43.5–66.5ROR 63.5 · χ² 3,682 / p <1e-300
53.0 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Poor venous access1252.9
30.3–92.6ROR 54.3 · χ² 560 / p 4e-124
49.0 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)7350.9
41.2–62.8ROR 60.3 · χ² 3,528 / p <1e-300
50.2 EB05 41.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.6 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Sinus disorder2250.5
33.6–76.0ROR 53.0 · χ² 1,019 / p 8e-224
48.5 EB05 33.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 70.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Arthritis8448.5
40.0–58.9ROR 59.1 · χ² 3,874 / p <1e-300
48.0 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.8 · ♀ 18% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Stress7446.8
38.0–57.7ROR 55.6 · χ² 3,282 / p <1e-300
46.3 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 50.2 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Dysgeusia (altered taste)7042.7
34.4–53.0ROR 50.1 · χ² 2,814 / p <1e-300
42.2 EB05 34.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 77.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional product use issue7237.3
30.1–46.1ROR 44.0 · χ² 2,513 / p <1e-300
36.9 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 35.0 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Therapeutic product effect incomplete5636.0
28.2–46.1ROR 40.9 · χ² 1,878 / p <1e-300
35.6 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 43.9no trial data cached
Migraine7435.5
28.8–43.8ROR 42.1 · χ² 2,456 / p <1e-300
35.2 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 44.4 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot)7334.8
28.2–43.0ROR 41.2 · χ² 2,372 / p <1e-300
34.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.6 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Ulcer1234.3
19.6–59.9ROR 35.2 · χ² 355 / p 2e-79
32.6 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 28.0no trial data cached
Asthma7530.5
24.8–37.5ROR 36.2 · χ² 2,117 / p <1e-300
30.2 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 27.7no trial data cached
Middle insomnia1229.4
16.8–51.3ROR 30.1 · χ² 301 / p 1e-67
28.1 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 41.4no trial data cached
Palpitations (pounding heartbeat)7529.2
23.7–35.9ROR 34.6 · χ² 2,023 / p <1e-300
29.0 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 29.2 · ♀ 8% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Dyspnoea exertional2429.1
19.7–43.0ROR 30.6 · χ² 624 / p 5e-138
28.5 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Adverse drug reaction5628.5
22.3–36.4ROR 32.3 · χ² 1,463 / p <1e-300
28.2 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 53.2 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Fibromyalgia1222.5
12.9–39.3ROR 23.1 · χ² 225 / p 3e-51
21.6 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 19.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Loss of personal independence in daily activities122117.0
100.4–136.3ROR 158.7 · χ² 13,909 / p <1e-300
114.6 EB05 98.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 99.5 · ♀ 17% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Arthritis8448.5
40.0–58.9ROR 59.1 · χ² 3,874 / p <1e-300
48.0 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.8 · ♀ 18% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Covid-197519.3
15.7–23.7ROR 22.8 · χ² 1,293 / p 2e-283
19.2 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.1 · ♀ 6% (drug 48%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Palpitations (pounding heartbeat)7529.2
23.7–35.9ROR 34.6 · χ² 2,023 / p <1e-300
29.0 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 29.2 · ♀ 8% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Asthma7530.5
24.8–37.5ROR 36.2 · χ² 2,117 / p <1e-300
30.2 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 27.7no trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative7576.6
62.3–94.3ROR 91.3 · χ² 5,524 / p <1e-300
75.1 EB05 61.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 53.2 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Migraine7435.5
28.8–43.8ROR 42.1 · χ² 2,456 / p <1e-300
35.2 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 44.4 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Stress7446.8
38.0–57.7ROR 55.6 · χ² 3,282 / p <1e-300
46.3 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 50.2 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of product administration7318.8
15.2–23.2ROR 22.1 · χ² 1,221 / p 6e-268
18.7 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 30.5 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Pulmonary embolism (lung blood clot)7334.8
28.2–43.0ROR 41.2 · χ² 2,372 / p <1e-300
34.5 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 22.6 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis (leg blood clot)7350.9
41.2–62.8ROR 60.3 · χ² 3,528 / p <1e-300
50.2 EB05 41.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 33.6 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Accidental overdose7391.0
73.7–112.4ROR 108.0 · χ² 6,408 / p <1e-300
88.8 EB05 73.0 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 96.7 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Systemic lupus erythematosus7394.1
76.2–116.1ROR 111.6 · χ² 6,625 / p <1e-300
91.7 EB05 75.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 62.3 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional product use issue7237.3
30.1–46.1ROR 44.0 · χ² 2,513 / p <1e-300
36.9 EB05 30.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 35.0 · ♀ 2% (drug 48%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Epinephrine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Epinephrine are loss of personal independence in daily activities, arthritis, covid-19, cerebrovascular accident, palpitations, asthma. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Epinephrine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Epinephrine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Epinephrine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.