Eteplirsen side effects: what 2,391 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Exondys 51
Who reports
2,391 reports · 20% serious · 66 with death outcome · 2% female
Used for
EXONDYS 51 is indicated for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in patients who have a confirmed mutation of the DMD gene that is amenable to exon 51 skipping. This indication is approved under accelerated approval based on an increase in dystrophin in skeletal muscle observed in some patients treated with EXONDYS 51 .
What it is
EXONDYS 51 (eteplirsen) injection is a sterile, aqueous, preservative-free, concentrated solution for dilution prior to intravenous administration. EXONDYS 51 is clear and colorless, and may have some opalescence, and may contain white to off-white amorphous particles.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 19 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 8 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poor venous access | 187 | 161.8 140.8–185.9ROR 175.5 · χ² 29,195 / p <1e-300 | 156.4 EB05 138.4 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=4 | no trial data cached |
| Intentional dose omission | 279 | 90.4 80.9–101.0ROR 102.2 · χ² 24,353 / p <1e-300 | 88.9 EB05 80.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 9.5 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| No adverse event | 550 | 27.3 25.3–29.4ROR 35.1 · χ² 13,971 / p <1e-300 | 27.2 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission issue | 696 | 21.5 20.2–22.9ROR 29.9 · χ² 13,729 / p <1e-300 | 21.4 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 12.8 | no trial data cached |
| Device issue | 182 | 18.3 15.9–21.1ROR 19.8 · χ² 2,971 / p <1e-300 | 18.3 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.5 · 90% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Gastroenteritis viral | 18 | 8.7 5.5–13.8ROR 8.8 · χ² 115 / p 3e-27 | 7.6 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.6 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 14 | 8.3 4.9–13.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 82 / p 6e-20 | 6.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
| Device occlusion | 13 | 8.2 4.8–14.1ROR 8.2 · χ² 75 / p 2e-18 | 6.7 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | 10 | 8.1 4.4–15.1ROR 8.1 · χ² 55 / p 5e-14 | 6.3 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1 | no trial data cached |
| Acute respiratory failure | 15 | 6.9 4.2–11.4ROR 6.9 · χ² 70 / p 4e-17 | 5.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.9 | no trial data cached |
| Femur fracture | 24 | 6.8 4.6–10.1ROR 6.8 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26 | 6.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 18.9 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission | 41 | 5.4 4.0–7.4ROR 5.5 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33 | 5.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Illness | 55 | 4.8 3.7–6.2ROR 4.9 · χ² 163 / p 2e-37 | 4.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.6 | no trial data cached |
| Increased appetite | 10 | 4.7 2.5–8.7ROR 4.7 · χ² 25 / p 2e-7 | 3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.5 | no trial data cached |
| Lower limb fracture | 10 | 4.6 2.5–8.5ROR 4.6 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7 | 3.9 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.7 | no trial data cached |
| Covid-19 | 87 | 4.3 3.5–5.3ROR 4.4 · χ² 220 / p 5e-50 | 4.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.6 | no trial data cached |
| Influenza | 52 | 4.1 3.1–5.3ROR 4.1 · χ² 118 / p 7e-28 | 3.9 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.3 | no trial data cached |
| Underdose | 33 | 4.0 2.8–5.6ROR 4.0 · χ² 70 / p 2e-17 | 3.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Therapy cessation | 23 | 3.9 2.6–5.9ROR 4.0 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12 | 3.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.3 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product dose omission issue | 696 | 21.5 20.2–22.9ROR 29.9 · χ² 13,729 / p <1e-300 | 21.4 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 12.8 | no trial data cached |
| No adverse event | 550 | 27.3 25.3–29.4ROR 35.1 · χ² 13,971 / p <1e-300 | 27.2 EB05 25.3 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intentional dose omission | 279 | 90.4 80.9–101.0ROR 102.2 · χ² 24,353 / p <1e-300 | 88.9 EB05 80.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 9.5 · 96% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Poor venous access | 187 | 161.8 140.8–185.9ROR 175.5 · χ² 29,195 / p <1e-300 | 156.4 EB05 138.4 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=4 | no trial data cached |
| Device issue | 182 | 18.3 15.9–21.1ROR 19.8 · χ² 2,971 / p <1e-300 | 18.3 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.5 · 90% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Covid-19 | 87 | 4.3 3.5–5.3ROR 4.4 · χ² 220 / p 5e-50 | 4.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 4.6 | no trial data cached |
| Illness | 55 | 4.8 3.7–6.2ROR 4.9 · χ² 163 / p 2e-37 | 4.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.6 | no trial data cached |
| Influenza | 52 | 4.1 3.1–5.3ROR 4.1 · χ² 118 / p 7e-28 | 3.9 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.3 | no trial data cached |
| Product dose omission | 41 | 5.4 4.0–7.4ROR 5.5 · χ² 144 / p 2e-33 | 5.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 14.1 · 93% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Underdose | 33 | 4.0 2.8–5.6ROR 4.0 · χ² 70 / p 2e-17 | 3.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | 97% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Femur fracture | 24 | 6.8 4.6–10.1ROR 6.8 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26 | 6.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 18.9 | no trial data cached |
| Therapy cessation | 23 | 3.9 2.6–5.9ROR 4.0 · χ² 48 / p 2e-12 | 3.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.3 · 91% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Gastroenteritis viral | 18 | 8.7 5.5–13.8ROR 8.8 · χ² 115 / p 3e-27 | 7.6 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.6 | no trial data cached |
| Acute respiratory failure | 15 | 6.9 4.2–11.4ROR 6.9 · χ² 70 / p 4e-17 | 5.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.9 | no trial data cached |
| Insurance issue | 14 | 8.3 4.9–13.9ROR 8.3 · χ² 82 / p 6e-20 | 6.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Poor venous access — n=187, PRR 161.8
- Femur fracture — n=24, PRR 6.8
- Covid-19 — n=87, PRR 4.3
- Influenza — n=52, PRR 4.1
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Eteplirsen?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Eteplirsen are poor venous access, covid-19, influenza, femur fracture, gastroenteritis viral, acute respiratory failure. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Eteplirsen have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Eteplirsen has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Eteplirsen causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 33bff678-7829-479e-9110-b8e33a0bc0aa, effective 20250813; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"ETEPLIRSEN") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 27 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.