← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Fidaxomicin side effects: what 2,385 FDA adverse event reports show

Fidaxomicin · Dificid · 62 reaction terms · 2,181 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Macrolide Antibacterial

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Dificid

openFDA label

Who reports

2,385 reports · 59% serious · 257 with death outcome · 62% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

DIFICID is a macrolide antibacterial indicated in adult and pediatric patients 6 months of age and older for the treatment of C. difficile -associated diarrhea. ( 1.1 ) To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of DIFICID and other antibacterial drugs, DIFICID should be used only to treat infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by C. difficile .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DIFICID (fidaxomicin) is a macrolide antibacterial drug for oral administration. Its CAS chemical name is Oxacyclooctadeca-3,5,9,13,15-pentaen-2-one, 3-[[[6-deoxy-4- O -(3,5-dichloro-2-ethyl-4.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 39 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 10Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 23 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Disease recurrence17933.1
28.7–38.1ROR 35.7 · χ² 5,532 / p <1e-300
32.9 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 21.2no trial data cached
Product packaging quantity issue2923.4
16.3–33.6ROR 23.7 · χ² 599 / p 1e-132
23.0 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue3314.3
10.2–20.0ROR 14.5 · χ² 394 / p 5e-88
14.0 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Treatment failure11912.8
10.7–15.2ROR 13.4 · χ² 1,282 / p 6e-281
12.7 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Melaena (black stool)2811.2
7.7–16.1ROR 11.3 · χ² 249 / p 2e-56
10.5 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6 · ♀ 30% (drug 62%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Pneumonia aspiration3110.9
7.7–15.5ROR 11.1 · χ² 270 / p 5e-61
10.3 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Hepatic cytolysis1510.8
6.5–17.9ROR 10.9 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
9.4 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8no trial data cached
Incorrect product administration duration2410.4
7.0–15.5ROR 10.5 · χ² 195 / p 1e-44
9.6 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=14no trial data cached
Poor quality product administered1210.3
5.9–18.2ROR 10.4 · χ² 92 / p 4e-22
8.6 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Gastroenteritis1710.3
6.4–16.5ROR 10.3 · χ² 133 / p 5e-31
9.0 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7no trial data cached
Drug resistance289.6
6.6–13.9ROR 9.7 · χ² 207 / p 3e-47
8.8 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.7 · ♀ 27% (drug 62%)no trial data cached
Septic shock469.4
7.0–12.5ROR 9.5 · χ² 336 / p 3e-75
8.9 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1 · ♀ 40% (drug 62%)no trial data cached
Inability to afford medication108.9
4.8–16.6ROR 9.0 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
7.0 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Adrenal insufficiency118.1
4.5–14.6ROR 8.1 · χ² 61 / p 2e-15
6.4 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus infection157.9
4.8–13.1ROR 8.0 · χ² 84 / p 2e-20
6.7 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.8no trial data cached
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms227.6
5.0–11.5ROR 7.6 · χ² 119 / p 5e-28
6.7 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
White blood cell count increased306.9
4.8–9.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 144 / p 1e-33
6.3 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 3.7 · ♀ 40% (drug 62%) · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Oral candidiasis (oral thrush)106.8
3.6–12.6ROR 6.8 · χ² 43 / p 2e-11
5.3 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
Leukocytosis136.3
3.7–10.9ROR 6.4 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
5.3 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Hypoxia (low oxygen)246.0
4.0–9.0ROR 6.1 · χ² 96 / p 7e-23
5.4 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.9 · ♀ 14% (drug 62%) · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Rash maculo-papular156.0
3.6–9.9ROR 6.0 · χ² 57 / p 2e-14
5.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Device related infection105.7
3.1–10.6ROR 5.7 · χ² 34 / p 2e-9
4.6 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Colitis225.1
3.4–7.8ROR 5.2 · χ² 69 / p 4e-17
4.7 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.1no trial data cached
Cholestasis (bile flow blockage)115.1
2.8–9.1ROR 5.1 · χ² 32 / p 8e-9
4.3 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0no trial data cached
Product dispensing error124.9
2.8–8.5ROR 4.9 · χ² 33 / p 5e-9
4.2 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3504.8
4.3–5.3ROR 5.4 · χ² 1,077 / p 2e-236
4.8 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Peritonitis114.7
2.6–8.4ROR 4.7 · χ² 28 / p 6e-8
4.0 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Faeces discoloured114.5
2.5–8.0ROR 4.5 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
3.8 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +0.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2no trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)284.4
3.1–6.4ROR 4.5 · χ² 71 / p 2e-17
4.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome144.4
2.6–7.4ROR 4.4 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
3.9 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Flatulence (gas)284.4
3.0–6.3ROR 4.4 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
4.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.4 · ♀ 90% (drug 62%)no trial data cached
No adverse event864.3
3.5–5.2ROR 4.4 · χ² 213 / p 1e-48
4.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Hyperkalaemia (high potassium)164.0
2.5–6.6ROR 4.1 · χ² 34 / p 3e-9
3.7 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Product availability issue103.9
2.1–7.3ROR 3.9 · χ² 19 / p 7e-6
3.4 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.3no trial data cached
Frequent bowel movements113.6
2.0–6.5ROR 3.6 · χ² 18 / p 1e-5
3.2 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.7Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Colitis ulcerative173.4
2.1–5.4ROR 3.4 · χ² 26 / p 2e-7
3.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +0.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3504.8
4.3–5.3ROR 5.4 · χ² 1,077 / p 2e-236
4.8 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Disease recurrence17933.1
28.7–38.1ROR 35.7 · χ² 5,532 / p <1e-300
32.9 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 21.2no trial data cached
Treatment failure11912.8
10.7–15.2ROR 13.4 · χ² 1,282 / p 6e-281
12.7 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.2no trial data cached
No adverse event864.3
3.5–5.2ROR 4.4 · χ² 213 / p 1e-48
4.2 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Septic shock469.4
7.0–12.5ROR 9.5 · χ² 336 / p 3e-75
8.9 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1 · ♀ 40% (drug 62%)no trial data cached
Product prescribing issue3314.3
10.2–20.0ROR 14.5 · χ² 394 / p 5e-88
14.0 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 8.8no trial data cached
Pneumonia aspiration3110.9
7.7–15.5ROR 11.1 · χ² 270 / p 5e-61
10.3 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6 · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
White blood cell count increased306.9
4.8–9.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 144 / p 1e-33
6.3 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 3.7 · ♀ 40% (drug 62%) · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Product packaging quantity issue2923.4
16.3–33.6ROR 23.7 · χ² 599 / p 1e-132
23.0 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=2no trial data cached
Flatulence (gas)284.4
3.0–6.3ROR 4.4 · χ² 69 / p 5e-17
4.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.4 · ♀ 90% (drug 62%)no trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)284.4
3.1–6.4ROR 4.5 · χ² 71 / p 2e-17
4.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Drug resistance289.6
6.6–13.9ROR 9.7 · χ² 207 / p 3e-47
8.8 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.7 · ♀ 27% (drug 62%)no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Fidaxomicin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Fidaxomicin are clostridium difficile infection, diarrhoea, clostridium difficile colitis, septic shock, pneumonia aspiration, white blood cell count increased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Fidaxomicin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Fidaxomicin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Fidaxomicin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.