← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Fludarabine side effects: what 39,092 FDA adverse event reports show

Fludarabine Phosphate · 1,146 reaction terms · 149,383 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nucleotide metabolic inhibitor

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Fludarabine Phosphate (Fludarabine Phosphate)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

39,092 reports · 98% serious · 11,956 with death outcome · 40% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Fludarabine Phosphate Injection is a nucleotide metabolic inhibitor indicated for: The treatment of adult patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have not responded to or whose disease has progressed during treatment with at least one standard alkylating-agent containing regimen. Benefit in treatment-naïve or non-refractory CLL patients is not established.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Fludarabine Phosphate Injection contains fludarabine phosphate, a nucleotide metabolic inhibitor. Fludarabine phosphate is a fluorinated nucleotide analog of the antiviral agent vidarabine, 9- ß -D-arabinofuranosyladenine (ara-A), that is relatively resistant to deamination by adenosine deaminase.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

CNS TOXICITY, HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA, AND PULMONARY TOXICITY WARNING: CNS TOXICITY, HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA, AND PULMONARY TOXICITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Severe central nervous system toxicity occurred in 36% of patients treated with doses approximately four times greater (96 mg/m 2 /day for 5 to 7 days) than the recommended dose.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 17Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 1Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,106 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pre-engraftment immune reaction642,254.2
1,284.8–3,955.0ROR 2,257.9 · calibrated p 5e-19 ✓
380.0 EB05 308.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=64 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adenovirus reactivation991,376.4
947.1–2,000.5ROR 1,379.9 · calibrated p 7e-18 ✓
356.1 EB05 301.0 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=98 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Meningomyelitis herpes20880.6
430.5–1,801.1ROR 881.0 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
251.5 EB05 171.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Cytokine increased69578.7
411.3–814.1ROR 579.7 · calibrated p 6e-14 ✓
257.0 EB05 210.0 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=69 · 100% clinicianNCT00281918: 1/402 (0.2%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Chimerism40440.3
289.4–669.7ROR 440.7 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
215.9 EB05 165.4 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Protothecosis41416.6
276.7–627.2ROR 417.0 · calibrated p 3e-12 ✓
210.6 EB05 161.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 40%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Juvenile chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia20364.4
206.1–644.0ROR 364.6 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
179.3 EB05 122.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=20not reported in cached trials
Acute graft versus host disease in intestine559357.6
321.3–397.9ROR 362.7 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
212.1 EB05 197.7 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=556 · 99% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome104289.2
227.7–367.2ROR 290.0 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
181.1 EB05 153.7 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=104 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Engraftment syndrome205288.8
243.7–342.3ROR 290.3 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
183.9 EB05 163.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=202not reported in cached trials
Human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis97278.5
217.8–356.1ROR 279.2 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
176.4 EB05 148.9 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Encephalitis cytomegalovirus145271.7
222.4–331.8ROR 272.7 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
175.6 EB05 152.9 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=145 · ♀ 10% (drug 40%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone marrow transplant rejection72257.0
194.0–340.6ROR 257.5 · calibrated p 9e-11 ✓
165.7 EB05 136.0 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Viruria34256.6
170.4–386.5ROR 256.8 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
157.9 EB05 118.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic graft versus host disease in intestine59249.4
183.0–339.8ROR 249.7 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
161.0 EB05 129.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Disseminated toxoplasmosis35234.1
157.2–348.4ROR 234.3 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
149.4 EB05 112.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adenoviral hepatitis69227.8
171.8–302.1ROR 228.2 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
152.8 EB05 124.9 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=69 · ♀ 79% (drug 40%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinitis viral35222.8
150.1–330.7ROR 223.0 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓
144.8 EB05 108.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 100% (drug 40%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cord blood transplant therapy25220.1
138.1–351.0ROR 220.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
139.3 EB05 99.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=25not reported in cached trials
Adenovirus infection816214.0
197.4–231.9ROR 218.5 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
152.0 EB05 143.5 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=805 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood stem cell transplant failure61212.0
157.6–285.3ROR 212.4 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓
144.8 EB05 116.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60 · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome47206.9
147.7–289.9ROR 207.2 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
140.6 EB05 110.0 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 62% (drug 40%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Engraft failure76194.9
149.9–253.5ROR 195.3 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
137.8 EB05 113.7 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=76 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Fludarabine as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)4,3502.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.656
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.9 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,9711.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.459
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cytokine release syndrome2,90596.5
92.9–100.3ROR 104.2 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
81.7 EB05 79.3 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 48.7 · 96% clinicianNCT00281918: 1/402 (0.2%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Febrile neutropenia2,82623.9
23.0–24.8ROR 25.7 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
22.9 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 13.5 · 95% clinicianNCT00281918: 31/402 (7.7%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Product use in unapproved indication2,2435.0
4.8–5.2ROR 5.2 · calibrated p 0.214
4.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.7 · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))2,0128.1
7.7–8.4ROR 8.5 · calibrated p 0.056
8.0 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.8 · 96% clinicianNCT00281918: 31/402 (7.7%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Cytomegalovirus infection1,68260.3
57.4–63.4ROR 63.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
54.2 EB05 52.1 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 32.0 · 96% clinicianNCT00281918: 1/402 (0.2%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Thrombocytopenia (low platelets)1,6358.0
7.6–8.4ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.060
7.9 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 4.8 · 96% clinicianNCT00281918: 6/402 (1.5%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Sepsis (blood infection)1,5427.5
7.1–7.9ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.073
7.4 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.4 · 94% clinicianNCT00281918: 5/402 (1.2%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,4572.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.822
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 1.5 · 95% clinicianNCT00281918: 18/402 (4.5%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Infection1,3865.2
4.9–5.5ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.200
5.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 3.8 · 96% clinicianNCT00281918: 5/402 (1.2%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)1,38213.6
12.9–14.4ROR 14.1 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.3 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 7.9 · 93% clinicianNCT00281918: 7/402 (1.7%) on Fludarabine (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Fludarabine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Fludarabine are pyrexia, cytokine release syndrome, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, cytomegalovirus infection, thrombocytopenia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Fludarabine have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: CNS TOXICITY, HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA, AND PULMONARY TOXICITY WARNING: CNS TOXICITY, HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA, AND PULMONARY TOXICITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Severe central nervous system toxicity occurred in 36% of patients treated with doses approximately four times greater (96 mg/m 2 /day for 5 to 7 days) than the recommended dose.

Do FAERS signals prove that Fludarabine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.