Fomepizole side effects: what 189 FDA adverse event reports show
Who reports
189 reports · 98% serious · 69 with death outcome · 43% female
Used for
Fomepizole injection is indicated as an antidote for ethylene glycol (such as antifreeze) or methanol poisoning, or for use in suspected ethylene glycol or methanol ingestion, either alone or in combination with hemodialysis (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).
What it is
DESCRIPTION Fomepizole Injection is intended for intravenous use. Fomepizole Injection is a competitive inhibitor of alcohol dehydrogenase.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 10 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 2 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain oedema | 16 | 140.7 88.0–225.0ROR 153.7 · χ² 2,081 / p <1e-300 | 120.7 EB05 78.8 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 83.0 | no trial data cached |
| Hepatotoxicity (liver damage) | 17 | 85.1 54.1–134.0ROR 93.5 · χ² 1,331 / p 9e-292 | 77.9 EB05 51.5 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 50.8 | no trial data cached |
| Acute hepatic failure | 10 | 81.6 44.7–149.3ROR 86.1 · χ² 718 / p 2e-158 | 71.0 EB05 41.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 47.7 | no trial data cached |
| Metabolic acidosis | 23 | 80.7 55.0–118.3ROR 91.7 · χ² 1,732 / p <1e-300 | 75.7 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 47.4 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Coagulopathy | 10 | 66.8 36.5–122.1ROR 70.5 · χ² 584 / p 2e-129 | 59.6 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 40.8 | no trial data cached |
| Encephalopathy | 12 | 54.4 31.4–94.0ROR 58.0 · χ² 577 / p 9e-128 | 50.3 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 31.9 | no trial data cached |
| Respiratory depression | 5 | 45.3 19.1–107.5ROR 46.5 · χ² 174 / p 4e-40 | 38.5 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.2 | no trial data cached |
| Lactic acidosis | 11 | 38.0 21.4–67.5ROR 40.3 · χ² 361 / p 9e-81 | 35.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 22.3 | no trial data cached |
| Toxicity to various agents | 50 | 33.1 26.1–41.9ROR 44.6 · χ² 1,535 / p <1e-300 | 32.7 EB05 25.8 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.9 · 98% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intentional overdose | 18 | 31.3 20.2–48.6ROR 34.5 · χ² 500 / p 5e-111 | 30.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 19.0 | no trial data cached |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toxicity to various agents | 50 | 33.1 26.1–41.9ROR 44.6 · χ² 1,535 / p <1e-300 | 32.7 EB05 25.8 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 19.9 · 98% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Metabolic acidosis | 23 | 80.7 55.0–118.3ROR 91.7 · χ² 1,732 / p <1e-300 | 75.7 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 47.4 · 95% clinician | no trial data cached |
| Intentional overdose | 18 | 31.3 20.2–48.6ROR 34.5 · χ² 500 / p 5e-111 | 30.4 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 19.0 | no trial data cached |
| Hepatotoxicity (liver damage) | 17 | 85.1 54.1–134.0ROR 93.5 · χ² 1,331 / p 9e-292 | 77.9 EB05 51.5 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 50.8 | no trial data cached |
| Brain oedema | 16 | 140.7 88.0–225.0ROR 153.7 · χ² 2,081 / p <1e-300 | 120.7 EB05 78.8 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 83.0 | no trial data cached |
| Encephalopathy | 12 | 54.4 31.4–94.0ROR 58.0 · χ² 577 / p 9e-128 | 50.3 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 31.9 | no trial data cached |
| Lactic acidosis | 11 | 38.0 21.4–67.5ROR 40.3 · χ² 361 / p 9e-81 | 35.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 22.3 | no trial data cached |
| Coagulopathy | 10 | 66.8 36.5–122.1ROR 70.5 · χ² 584 / p 2e-129 | 59.6 EB05 34.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 40.8 | no trial data cached |
| Acute hepatic failure | 10 | 81.6 44.7–149.3ROR 86.1 · χ² 718 / p 2e-158 | 71.0 EB05 41.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 47.7 | no trial data cached |
| Respiratory depression | 5 | 45.3 19.1–107.5ROR 46.5 · χ² 174 / p 4e-40 | 38.5 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 27.2 | no trial data cached |
| Hypothermia | 4 | 43.8 16.6–115.4ROR 44.7 · χ² 127 / p 9e-30 | 35.2 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 26.0 | no trial data cached |
| Drug toxicity | 3 | 24.1 7.8–74.1ROR 24.5 · χ² 45 / p 8e-12 | 14.7 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +0.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 14.7 | no trial data cached |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Metabolic acidosis — n=23, PRR 80.7
- Toxicity to various agents — n=50, PRR 33.1
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Fomepizole?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Fomepizole are toxicity to various agents, metabolic acidosis, hepatotoxicity, brain oedema, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Fomepizole have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Fomepizole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Fomepizole causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 1dea37fd-ec17-416e-b28e-980a87d49e1a, effective 20231026; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"FOMEPIZOLE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 12 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath
Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.